I've been dwelling on this last episode and I guess I'm surrendering my hope for Locke because it seems the writers are insinuating Locke's kick-buttedness was actually a form of rebellion on his part. Locke is supposed to be a man of peace, of logic, of wisdom, a bridge builder.
I'm arriving at this because the test Alpert gave for young Locke. Locke was supposed to choose items that already belonged to him, presumably a plot device to give us some inkling into the real nature of Locke, and perhaps a nature that Locke has always fought against because of his chronically imperiled self-esteem; Locke wants to be the "prom king," a "super hero," so he chooses the knife, but Alpert abruptly ends the testing session by letting us know Locke is not ready to assume his truly special, chosen nature. The other item he left on the table that stood out is the Book of Laws, which could be any number of things:
- A misrepresentation (intentional or otherwise) of the Mosaic Book of Law found in Leviticus and referenced by Eko in Season 2;
- A misrepresentation (intentional or otherwise) of Aleister Crowley's The Book of The Law in which he pronounces the Satanic agenda: "Do as thou wilt."
- A reference to the Ba'hai Book of Laws, which is the basis for the 19th-century Persian semi-universalist religion.
- A less formal, loosely written Book of Law, such as legend has it were created by French buccaneers seeking to limit pirating among pirates. Honestly, though, these were never written laws. They were codes often included in swearing of allegiances to various factions.
- A formal Book of Law that John Locke wrote in a previous life (future life?) for the Others.
Anyway you look at it, that book had the earmarks of who Locke was probably supposed to be, but he took a path that veered from destiny and he never realized his birthright.