Official World Cup 2010 thread

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,291
Reaction score
11,925
Received this email from UoP Stadium.
UoP Stadium said:
Help bring the FIFA World Cup™ to Phoenix/Glendale!!

Wow, what a game today!! The U.S. has advanced to the next round of the FIFA World Cup™ and the momentum continues to build as the USA and Phoenix/Glendale try to bring the World Cup back to the United States in either 2018 or 2022. As a Stadium VIP Club member, we are encouraging you to show your support for the USA and Phoenix/Glendale Bid by signing the online petition at www.gousabid.com or by texting PHOENIXBID to 22442 (message and data rates may apply).

So sign up today, we need your support!! In doing so, you will be helping the United States and Phoenix/Glendale secure the largest sporting event in the world, The FIFA World Cup™. For more information about the 2018/2022 FIFA World Cup™ Bid visit www.gousabid.com.
 
OP
OP
Zeno

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,604
Reaction score
5,472
Location
Fort Myers
They should have the world cup in DC, Phily, New York.

It is going to be in more cities than that...DC, Philly & New York are all among the stadium finalists (although not really DC it's Maryland where the Skins play).

Complete list of the 18 cities being considered(27 were orginally considered).

Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston, Dallas, Denver, Houston, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Los Angeles, Miami, Nashville, New York, Philadelphia, Phoenix, San Diego, Seattle, Tampa and Washington, D.C.

The list will likely be reduced further. My guess is Kansas City, Miami, Indy, Nashville are on the bubble (Miami because of the heat and no indoor facility)...and I would guess it would either be Baltimore or DC and not both. Phoenix/Glendale might be a long shot because of the heat (stadium is indoors but training facilities wouldn't be).
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,943
Reaction score
6,874
Location
Goodyear
There are many cities where the games get played - I think the NE should definitely have a block for the travelling fans

However, I think the following cities could be great choices, although weather could impact a couple of them (for the fans, not the teams) ......... Seattle, Phoenix, Dallas, Boston, Chicago ....... i know they are trying to get the EJ Dome in order for St. Louis, but I don't think it's good enough .... i like the city as a host, just not their facilities ... maybe a place like KC

If they went with 10 like SA I could live with this:
  1. NY
  2. DC
  3. Boston
  4. Philly
  5. Seattle
  6. Phoenix
  7. Dallas
  8. KC
  9. Chicago
  10. LA

Although I heard something about Chicago being off the list of potential cities?!?!
 

rode kardinaal

Registered
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Posts
323
Reaction score
0
Location
netherlands
We're going for organisation of 2018 ourselves, but i have to say, i'd much rather visit the WC when in another country. Would be fun to meet up with you fellas to have these discussions around UoP or in a sports bar. Or at Majerly's ;).
 

Milgod

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 21, 2007
Posts
1,210
Reaction score
246
Location
Peterborough, UK
More than enough stadiums in those three.
What an odd idea of what hosting a World Cup is all about. Lets not even get into the fact that by holding just in the North East you would be ruling out most of the football fans in the US it also doesn't make it as fun.

Phoenix would be good in addition to the three you mentioned. There will probably be about 10 cities in total. The US is a diverse and amazing country why limit what people can see?
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,462
Reaction score
16,990
Location
Round Rock, TX
There are many cities where the games get played - I think the NE should definitely have a block for the travelling fans

However, I think the following cities could be great choices, although weather could impact a couple of them (for the fans, not the teams) ......... Seattle, Phoenix, Dallas, Boston, Chicago ....... i know they are trying to get the EJ Dome in order for St. Louis, but I don't think it's good enough .... i like the city as a host, just not their facilities ... maybe a place like KC

If they went with 10 like SA I could live with this:
  1. NY
  2. DC
  3. Boston
  4. Philly
  5. Seattle
  6. Phoenix
  7. Dallas
  8. KC
  9. Chicago
  10. LA

Although I heard something about Chicago being off the list of potential cities?!?!

LOL

L.A. at #10 behind Dallas and Kansas City?? Come on now. Home Depot Center is a great venue.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,672
Reaction score
16,535
The dutch have no Orange on. :-(

Should be a fun game to watch..... Robben might be playing some in the 2nd half.
 

Milgod

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 21, 2007
Posts
1,210
Reaction score
246
Location
Peterborough, UK
LOL

L.A. at #10 behind Dallas and Kansas City?? Come on now. Home Depot Center is a great venue.
Although not big enough right now. Are they palnning to expand?

The main attraction of the US bid is the vast number of HUGE stadiums.
 

Shzm13

ASFN Addict
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Posts
5,870
Reaction score
0
Location
Glendale
Should be a fun game to watch..... Robben might be playing some in the 2nd half.

Ive actually found Dutch games pretty boring thus far. Big names on offense does not equal big entertainment.

But they've done well for themselves in the results. Im sure they won't care how entertaining it is as long as theyre winning.
 
OP
OP
Zeno

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,604
Reaction score
5,472
Location
Fort Myers
However, I think the following cities could be great choices, although weather could impact a couple of them (for the fans, not the teams) ......... Seattle, Phoenix, Dallas, Boston, Chicago ....... i know they are trying to get the EJ Dome in order for St. Louis, but I don't think it's good enough .... i like the city as a host, just not their facilities ... maybe a place like KC

St Louis & Chicago were already eliminated from the original list of 27 cities.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,943
Reaction score
6,874
Location
Goodyear
LOL

L.A. at #10 behind Dallas and Kansas City?? Come on now. Home Depot Center is a great venue.

LOL that you thought I was ranking them in some kind of order of importance or preference

I was not

I was simply listing 10 cities that I thought would be good host cities

No where did I indicate that one should be over another - nor did I state which city should carry the torch for the championship game

Merely that SA has 10 stadiums in play and following that model here are 10 cities that I could see being hosts
 
OP
OP
Zeno

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,604
Reaction score
5,472
Location
Fort Myers
LOL

L.A. at #10 behind Dallas and Kansas City?? Come on now. Home Depot Center is a great venue.

Home Depot Center doesn't qualify(only 27K capacity)...

FIFA's criterion requires a candidate host nation to provide a minimum of 12 stadiums and a maximum of 18 capable of seating 40,000 or more spectators. Stadiums with a minimum capacity of 80,000 are required by FIFA for consideration to play host to the Opening Match and Final Match. The U.S. used stadiums in nine cities when it hosted the 1994 FIFA World Cup.
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,672
Reaction score
16,535
It'd be the Rose Bowl in LA.

Home of the championship game in 1994.

Seattle (Qwest Field), LA (Rose Bowl), Phoenix (UofP), NYC (New Giants Stadium), Philly (Eagles), Baltimore (Ravens) -OR- DC (Skins), Chicago (Bears), Dallas (Cowboys), New England (Patriots), Houston (Texans),

The Final should be in the Rose Bowl, NYC, or Cowboys stadium IMO.

The problem with the USA is the time zones. England is our main competition for the 2018 WC and they would have 10 stadiums within a 100 mile radius. Most of these stadiums would be WIDE OPEN for any scheduling which would give us a huge advantage IMO.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,943
Reaction score
6,874
Location
Goodyear
St Louis & Chicago were already eliminated from the original list of 27 cities.

Yeah - I thought I heard something about Chicago ... not sure it makes a ton of sense to remove them, which was why I was wondering if I heard right

Makes sense about StL as well - good soccer area, just no facilities and maybe not a "big time" city to showcase .... they recently put $30M into improvement to the EJ Dome ... I know that when they had the inspectors there this past fall that they were trying to use that upgrade plus the promise of a major renovation in 2015 to try and lure them .... sounds like it didn't work, which is not surprising
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,123
Posts
5,433,567
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top