I think he was more of a Russell Westbrook type of player in Orlando. He was a top player, for sure, but being in a weak Eastern conference without MJ helped him reach the finals so quickly. He put up big numbers and was ridiculously dominate for such a young player but until he went to LA he didn't help bring about championships for his team and work in the team concept so the numbers he put up were more to help push his team past their opponents rather than just putting up great stats and winning because the team had more talent. In LA the teams had talent but they also played up to their potential while Orlando the teams had talent, didn't always play to their potential, and would lose out in the playoffs because of that.
This doesn't jibe with my recollection.
He singlehandedly took a 20 win team and DOUBLED their win total to 41 in his first season where he won rookie of the year.
The next season, he and Penny (who was still also just a rookie) to 50 wins and a 4 seed where they lost to a building Pacers team. Built on the previous season to get to 50 wins. That's an improvement of
30 wins in two seasons.
The season after that, they won 57 games and the East wasn't weak by any stretch. Jordan had come back that season with 25 games left and while he wasn't peak Jordan, he and the Bulls were pretty damn good, ripping off a 17-4 streak to end the season. And that was just the in the conference Semi's. That Orlando team was the only one to beat ANY Jordan led team from 1991-1998. They then beat another VERY GOOD Pacers team. They went to the Finals and definitely fell apart against Houston, but Shaq still dominated.
His 4th season they won 60 games, in another VERY GOOD Eastern Conference only to get smoked what many thought was the greatest team of all time in the 72 win Bulls.
That's 4 seasons... where his team went from 21 wins... to 41 wins... to 57 wins and the Finals... to 60 wins and losing to the best team ever.
He definitely got better and more focussed in the LA years, but what great player doesn't as they get older.
Calling him a Westbrook because he didn't win a title in his first four years in the league doesn't make sense to me.