Freddy Garcia.
Suspicions sank some D-Backs:Steroid whispers quietly sent players packing
Ken Kendrick, managing general partner of the Arizona Diamondbacks, called on Tuesday to bawl me out. And he did. Then he handed me some news.
Among other things, Kendrick told me the team has "quietly" gotten rid of players that it suspected were using steroids. He spoke candidly against what he called the "whispers" of steroid use that have pestered Diamondbacks star Luis Gonzalez. And he said the Diamondbacks are working on a code of conduct that goes above and beyond the standards that already exist in Major League Baseball. He even took a shot at baseball's biggest suspected cheater, Barry Bonds, and the federal authorities who are hounding him.
Kendrick telephoned to say he didn't like a column I wrote for Tuesday's Arizona Republic about the team's handling of former player and steroid user Jason Grimsley. . . .
MaoTosiFanClub said:No comments on Kendrick throwing Gonzo under the bus? I agree with him in a way, but it was a bad move and something that definitely should not be said regardless of the player's stature.
Maybe Im reading this incorrectly, but how is he throwing Gonzo under the bus if he is speaking against the whispers?He spoke candidly against what he called the "whispers" of steroid use that have pestered Diamondbacks star Luis Gonzalez.
coyoteshockeyfan said:Maybe Im reading this incorrectly, but how is he throwing Gonzo under the bus if he is speaking against the whispers?
Rats said:A couple of more from way back....Jack Clark and Robin Yount. Clark was a skinny outfielder for SF and then boom he is a Hulk when moved to 1st base for STL and Yount overnight became a Goliath and started pounding homers. I really think that Steroids have been with the game since the 50's. Pitchers use just as much as other position players. There just weren't as many guys willing to use because of the side effects back in the day. I could really make a list of who I would suspect it would be 75% of sports. I do not believe the Griffey talk about him not being juiced either. He had rapid size growth over the last 4 seasons. He has almost gotten a pass by baseball but he is suspect IMO. This kind of scandal made it bad for the good guys of baseball, George Brett, Will Clark, etc...guys that could hit and play a position naturally and were leaders on there teams. They never got huge in size and could hit a curveball. Steriods doesn't make players skills better it just helps them sustain over the long season.
Well, not necessarily, it doesnt say that Kendrick was the one that brought up Gonzo. Montini could have asked about it and Kendrick responded (which is still a bit odd).Ryanwb said:Kendrick brought the name up, not EJ Montini..... It's just sort of an unwritten rule in business for people in leadership roles not to discuss specific individuals by name when dealing with controversy.
Kendrick brought the name up, not EJ Montini..... It's just sort of an unwritten rule in business for people in leadership roles not to discuss specific individuals by name when dealing with controversy.
Ruben Sierra had several lingering injuries for quite a few years and then suddenly out of nowhere in '01 generates 21 HRs and 67 RBI in only 94 games w/the Rangers.... On that squad there's Palmeiro, Gabe Kapler, Pudge, and Chad Curtis (another player I suspect to have roided-up in some point in his career).... Compare that to his output the following year when he went to the Mariners and only managed 13 HRs and 60 RBI in 122 games....He actually had 75 more ABs in '02 compared to '01....Charles V said:Ruben Sierra?
Homer Simpson said:If this is true, and I'm not sure if it is, though I do know steroids have been around in general since the 1930's, what about another pretty high-rpofile name?
Roger Maris.
Think about it. Kind of a journey man, traded by two teams in his first three years, with a career high of 28 homers when he arrived in New York prior to the 1960 season. Granted, it had only been three seasons, but then he suddenly hits 39, 61 and 33 homers in the next three years -- 133 of his 275 career homers (48.3%) in three years.
Then he dropped off quite suddenly -- not only in homers, but games played. He only once played more than 125 games in a season after 1962, when he played 141 in 1964, with 28 homers.
Plus, he quickly lost his hair during the 1961 season. Many have attributed it to the pressure of chasing Ruth, however, accelerated hair loss is one of the most common side effects of anabolic steroid use.
And, he died at a fairly young age (51). Although he did die of lymphatic cancer, and I honestly have no idea if steroids could contribute to that.
I have no idea if he did do them or not. And, I never will know for sure. However, I find it funny that so many people act like the players of yesteryear were immune from this type of behavior.
This is very well stated and I feel has merit. Wallys article does cast a light on these suspicions. Baseball from yester year is not immune to scrutiny in my opinion. What will really be damning is if it is proven that a major league team not just individuals on there own, administered a steroid program. If trainers or doctors paid by a major league team were giving steroids to players either in the minors or in the Latin leagues then there would be a smoking gun that baseball couldn't avoid. There is already significant proof from the Dominican leagues and from Mexican leagues that this was going on. Several groups tried to get congress to address this in the 90's but were rebuffed. I think that this is the thing the owners do not want to come out. It would hurt the game more than any individuals use of performance enhancers.Homer Simpson said:If this is true, and I'm not sure if it is, though I do know steroids have been around in general since the 1930's, what about another pretty high-rpofile name?
Roger Maris.
Think about it. Kind of a journey man, traded by two teams in his first three years, with a career high of 28 homers when he arrived in New York prior to the 1960 season. Granted, it had only been three seasons, but then he suddenly hits 39, 61 and 33 homers in the next three years -- 133 of his 275 career homers (48.3%) in three years.
Then he dropped off quite suddenly -- not only in homers, but games played. He only once played more than 125 games in a season after 1962, when he played 141 in 1964, with 28 homers.
Plus, he quickly lost his hair during the 1961 season. Many have attributed it to the pressure of chasing Ruth, however, accelerated hair loss is one of the most common side effects of anabolic steroid use.
And, he died at a fairly young age (51). Although he did die of lymphatic cancer, and I honestly have no idea if steroids could contribute to that.
I have no idea if he did do them or not. And, I never will know for sure. However, I find it funny that so many people act like the players of yesteryear were immune from this type of behavior.
Rats said:This is very well stated and I feel has merit. Wallys article does cast a light on these suspicions. Baseball from yester year is not immune to scrutiny in my opinion. What will really be damning is if it is proven that a major league team not just individuals on there own, administered a steroid program. If trainers or doctors paid by a major league team were giving steroids to players either in the minors or in the Latin leagues then there would be a smoking gun that baseball couldn't avoid. There is already significant proof from the Dominican leagues and from Mexican leagues that this was going on. Several groups tried to get congress to address this in the 90's but were rebuffed. I think that this is the thing the owners do not want to come out. It would hurt the game more than any individuals use of performance enhancers.