Protecting Murray

Sandan

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
24,691
Reaction score
2,161
Location
Plymouth, UK
Don't kid yourself -

The Cards had the worst O line in the league last year and an O line that ranks as one of the lowest in the history of the NFL.

The day you say 'the trenches' (O line and D line) don't matter is the day you officially announce you know nothing of the game of football. (not saying you are here....keep reading)
Are you talking about the original starters, the backups or the backups to the backups ?

Last year our starting OL barely saw the field
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,395
Reaction score
29,778
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I found it yesterday (or day before). I didn’t save the link, but I provided the data. Not looking it up again, but seems easy enough to confirm if you’re questioning its validity.

And I’m fine with limiting the time period viewed. The only reason I went back to 72 is because that’s what the data showed. But I think your “last ten years” is likely too limited a data set. I mean, Randall Cunningham ran for 900 yards in ‘90. And the guy he’s most compared to, Vick, played in the early 2000’s.

But even if you want to limit it to last 10 years it’s still only 8 occurrences. Out of 320 possible opportunities. That’s 2.5% of the time. When talking about prevalence I would hardly call that “many, many times.” How do you propose to move the field goals next? I’m game.
https://pickingpros.com/nfl/quarterback-rushing-leaders.php

QB rushing leaders (yardage), anyone over 600 yards, and count of those between 600 and 400), since 2001:

2001 - Kordell Stewart (527), 3 others
2002 - Mike Vick (749), Daunte Culpepper, 2 others
2003 - Daunte Culpepper (422)
2004 - Mike Vick (902), 1 other
2005 - Mick VIck (597)
2006 - Mike Vick (1039!), 1 other
2007 - Vince Young (395)
2008 - Tyler Thigpen (386)
2009 - David Garrard (323)
2010 - Mike Vick (676)
2011 - Cam Newton (709), Tim Tebow, 1 other
2012 - Robert Griffin III (833), Cam Newton, 2 others
2013 - Cam Newton (587), 5 others
2014 - Russell Wilson (849), Colin Kaepernick, 2 others
2015 - Cam Newton (636), 3 others
2016 - Tyrod Taylor (580), 1 other
2017 - Cam Newton (754), 3 others
2018 - Lamar Jackson (697), Josh Allen, 3 others​

So it looks like your source is old or something? Again, it's not really an outlier condition that Andy Dalton didn't rush for 600 yards. It's probably more reasonable to say that, as a dual threat quarterback, you should reasonably expect Murray to rush for more yards than Tyler Thigpen.

If you expect the guy to add value as a runner, and I think we all do, then you expect him to approach the benchmarks of other QBs who add value as runners. If Kyler Murray is rushing for as many yards as a rookie as Marcus Mariota did, I think we're all going to be disappointed, because one of the traits that elevated him to #1 overall failed to appear.
 

dscher

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
13,261
Reaction score
8,313
Location
Mesa, AZ
That's what I think we'll see. Even if you don't like Murray much, he is a much more advanced passer than Newton was coming out.

I just don't see a 3-13 year. I don't. Moving back to a 3-4 and all the additions almost guarantee the defense is going to be better. I think health on the offensive line will make them better, the Cardinals had a ridiculous number of injuries. I think the offensive line won't be a bottom 3 unit.
:stick: I just got a little nauseous
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,593
Reaction score
58,003
Location
SoCal
https://pickingpros.com/nfl/quarterback-rushing-leaders.php

QB rushing leaders (yardage), anyone over 600 yards, and count of those between 600 and 400), since 2001:

2001 - Kordell Stewart (527), 3 others
2002 - Mike Vick (749), Daunte Culpepper, 2 others
2003 - Daunte Culpepper (422)
2004 - Mike Vick (902), 1 other
2005 - Mick VIck (597)
2006 - Mike Vick (1039!), 1 other
2007 - Vince Young (395)
2008 - Tyler Thigpen (386)
2009 - David Garrard (323)
2010 - Mike Vick (676)
2011 - Cam Newton (709), Tim Tebow, 1 other
2012 - Robert Griffin III (833), Cam Newton, 2 others
2013 - Cam Newton (587), 5 others
2014 - Russell Wilson (849), Colin Kaepernick, 2 others
2015 - Cam Newton (636), 3 others
2016 - Tyrod Taylor (580), 1 other
2017 - Cam Newton (754), 3 others
2018 - Lamar Jackson (697), Josh Allen, 3 others​

So it looks like your source is old or something? Again, it's not really an outlier condition that Andy Dalton didn't rush for 600 yards. It's probably more reasonable to say that, as a dual threat quarterback, you should reasonably expect Murray to rush for more yards than Tyler Thigpen.

If you expect the guy to add value as a runner, and I think we all do, then you expect him to approach the benchmarks of other QBs who add value as runners. If Kyler Murray is rushing for as many yards as a rookie as Marcus Mariota did, I think we're all going to be disappointed, because one of the traits that elevated him to #1 overall failed to appear.
Eh I kinda think you’re moving the goalposts. But i concede there are “more” albeit not many, that’s still 2.4% of QBs that started each season. And Wilson has only done it once, Kap only once, and even Newton only 50% of the time. So again I think using that as a floor is setting really high expectations. I think people only set such lofty floors if they are trying to set up failure so they can later say “told you so.” Only the elite of the elite running QBs seem to hit or exceed that mark. I mean, I hope - but based on the data you provided hardly expect - Murray to hit that mark.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,466
Location
Charlotte, NC
Eh I kinda think you’re moving the goalposts. But i concede there are “more” albeit not many, that’s still 2.4% of QBs that started each season. And Wilson has only done it once, Kap only once, and even Newton only 50% of the time. So again I think using that as a floor is setting really high expectations. I think people only set such lofty floors if they are trying to set up failure so they can later say “told you so.” Only the elite of the elite running QBs seem to hit or exceed that mark. I mean, I hope - but based on the data you provided hardly expect - Murray to hit that mark.

If sacks were not subtracted from his rushing totals, Murray would have run for over 1100 yards last year on 160 or so carries. That's pretty bad ass.

I think 600 yards is not unreasonable; I think he's going to exceed that total.

My stat line for Murray:

3500 yards passing, 62% completion. 23 TDs, 14 Ints (I think he's going to throw some picks because he's not used to the smaller windows at first).
700 rushing yards, 6 TDs.

29 total TDs.

(Josh Rosen 3200 yards, 60% completion, 19 TDs, 15 Ints, sacked 50 times. Dolphins 3-13. 1st pick in the draft. Flores is going to be awful)
 

Cardsfaninlouky

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Posts
4,768
Reaction score
6,782
Location
Louisville
The Cards have been widely criticized for not drafting an O-linemen who plays tackle or even guard. The question is fairly simple, what was the best way to protect their new QB? To most observers it was odd that after taking Murray, 2 of the next 3 picks went defense. To me the theory was simple, if the other team scores too many points the new QB will be constantly playing catch up. Predictably throwing every down and thereby allowing the opposing defense to just rush continuously. That would eventually exhaust the O-line and Murray. By focusing on a top corner the Cards were attempting to forestall quick scores that meant the offense never would get a chance to rest. Barring a rash of injuries this defense should be good enough to provide enough balance to the game to not overly tax Murray.

The other concern was if there was a strong pass rush, would Murray’s mobility be enough to protect him? The Cards saw 2 options to help; draft o-linemen or draft receivers. After their second pick there were no attractive o-lineman certain to provide protection. In fact before the draft the Cards had extensively added to the O-line. The Cards surveyed the situation and decided even with time there were too few targets for Murray. So they elected to go receiver which made sense looking at the pool. In fact I was truly surprised the Cards were able to assemble so many quality receivers. If pressured Murray should have plenty of options to get rid of the ball quickly. Now they must just make certain Murray knows he must protect himself.

In that regard Murray must understand this is the NFL. These opponents are bigger, faster and stronger. If he gets hit very often he will get hurt. Better to take a loss than an injury. The Cards are likely not a playoff team next year, but if (a really big if) this offense is just competitive they could be in 2020. Next year’s free agent group if not destroyed by tagging has some decent O-line prospects. The draft is favorable. Aside from the O-line upgrades the Cards lose Suggs & Swearinger. They could re-sign both. There are 2-3 decent tackles who will be available in the next draft. The point is that the Cards will be in position to contend if the offense works and Murray survives the 2019 season. So be hopeful. Don’t get carried away early. However, the Cards do appear to be on the right track.
Two ways of adding players obviously, through free agency & the draft. Obviously we needed an upgrade at OL & WR. They got both. As you said above, had a higher graded OL player been available in the 4th round & later, the cards may have drafted one? Either way, we needed weapons to catch passes & score points so we would've needed more WR's after selecting an OL player in the 4th round & higher anyways. It's a gamble either direction they went. Hopefully the OL upgrades will stay injury free & us taking so many WR's will pay off?
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
Call me crazy but I'll be thrilled if Murray doesn't run for a lot of yards if he throws for a bunch of yards and TD's. Scramble and pick up some first downs but always look to throw the ball first, which is what he mostly did in college.
 

The Kraken

Veteran
Joined
Jan 12, 2017
Posts
372
Reaction score
468
Location
San Diego CA
Heck, if he is under 600 yards rushing and we are winning games because teams are forced "spy" on him and maybe do not run as much man to man for fear of him taking off, I will be very pleased.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,712
Reaction score
10,601
Didnt help that our offense was like vanilla ice cream with no threats to speak of. Defense are not going to simply pin their ears back and come after Murray. They are going to half to respect the bubble screens, jet sweeps and rpo’s. That alone will buy this o- line a little time.

They are also going to have to worry about contain with Murray. Last year was “ I’ll meet you at the qb” mentality.

I’m am not disregarding the o - line. I just believe with the speed we have acquired and the diversity in play calling and design that it’s not all doom and gloom.

Exactly. The patriots don’t ever have a great online. They don’t need one because they get the ball out in 3 seconds.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
Kyler Murray is Deshaun Watson 2.0... I hope this franchise keeps him alive long enough where we can reap the benefits from drafting him
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
If sacks were not subtracted from his rushing totals, Murray would have run for over 1100 yards last year on 160 or so carries. That's pretty bad ass.

I think 600 yards is not unreasonable; I think he's going to exceed that total.

My stat line for Murray:

3500 yards passing, 62% completion. 23 TDs, 14 Ints (I think he's going to throw some picks because he's not used to the smaller windows at first).
700 rushing yards, 6 TDs.


29 total TDs.

(Josh Rosen 3200 yards, 60% completion, 19 TDs, 15 Ints, sacked 50 times. Dolphins 3-13. 1st pick in the draft. Flores is going to be awful)

You must be registered for see images attach
 

Vacard

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Posts
4,538
Reaction score
4,105
Location
VA
If sacks were not subtracted from his rushing totals, Murray would have run for over 1100 yards last year on 160 or so carries. That's pretty bad ass.

I think 600 yards is not unreasonable; I think he's going to exceed that total.

My stat line for Murray:

3500 yards passing, 62% completion. 23 TDs, 14 Ints (I think he's going to throw some picks because he's not used to the smaller windows at first).
700 rushing yards, 6 TDs.

29 total TDs.

(Josh Rosen 3200 yards, 60% completion, 19 TDs, 15 Ints, sacked 50 times. Dolphins 3-13. 1st pick in the draft. Flores is going to be awful)
I truly believe that Flores is a placeholder for someone who Ross really wants.
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,917
Reaction score
26,027
Location
Orlando, FL
Legitimately, what is the point of a dual threat QB if he doesn't use one of his tools?
The injury factor is so great and the replacement drop off so steep the hope is that running becomes a last resort or occurs in a situation where he can slide down to protect himself. Seattle lost most of a season when Wilson got hurt. It’s not that Murray can’t run but rather he shouldn’t. That’s why quite a few teams shun running QBs.
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,917
Reaction score
26,027
Location
Orlando, FL
Murray kinda reminds me of Fran Tarkenton(6 ft. Tall).
There was no combine but look up typical 40 times & and any bench press stats you can find from that era. There is no comparison to the modern day athlete. I loved Fran but he’d be physically destroyed by the current players. The speed/force numbers are so powerful now and the agility so refined Fran’s type of running around wouldn’t last very long Defensive guys from his era would break an ankle doing the 3 cone drill.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,405
Reaction score
4,151
Location
Monroe NC
Worst position to have to start a rookie on the OL is center.
I'm pretty tired of hearing how the O Line sucked last year and we need to draft a bunch of guys to fix it.

#1) Rookies don't help your O line at all. They virtually never help that fast.
#2) Our own O line hardly played at all last year. Injuries are part of the game to be sure, but no team had to endure having its entire line gone, at the same time starting a rookie QB with a rookie HC.

We ended up having a legendarily bad offense last year, but there are lots of reasons why. We had O line starters in multiple positions in multiple games who literally were not in the NFL the week before.

Wetzel had to start 5 games for us. Holden had 2 starts. Cunningham had 6. Barksdale had 4. Vujnovich had 2. Gossett had 4. Munyer had a start. Aboushi had 6.
And our rookie C who only came in because Shipley went down in preseason had 16 starts. Zero of these people were planned on.

Drafting more rookies and throwing them in amongst the other 20 already here wouldn't affect our game nearly so much as just keeping our guys upright and playing together for a while.

The problem is half of the guys who weren't planned on are still on the roster and the other half of the line are injury prone which will probably result in bringing in some more guys off the street by mid season. In fact you could argue that this collection of linemen is even worse since Wetzel is gone as is Barksdale. I would rather have a rookie who can start 16 games for me and allow him to grow and learn as he plays than depend on a guy who has a history of playing in 6-7 games and ending up on IR and having to start a backup who doesn't have half the talent the rookie has. The line is still a mess. A turd is still a turd no matter how much you shine it up.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,466
Location
Charlotte, NC
The problem is half of the guys who weren't planned on are still on the roster and the other half of the line are injury prone which will probably result in bringing in some more guys off the street by mid season. In fact you could argue that this collection of linemen is even worse since Wetzel is gone as is Barksdale. I would rather have a rookie who can start 16 games for me and allow him to grow and learn as he plays than depend on a guy who has a history of playing in 6-7 games and ending up on IR and having to start a backup who doesn't have half the talent the rookie has. The line is still a mess. A turd is still a turd no matter how much you shine it up.

Wetzel became expendable when Kunningham showed he could play a little.

Gilbert >>>>>>> Barksdale when healthy.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,342
Reaction score
40,460
Location
Colorado
The injury factor is so great and the replacement drop off so steep the hope is that running becomes a last resort or occurs in a situation where he can slide down to protect himself. Seattle lost most of a season when Wilson got hurt. It’s not that Murray can’t run but rather he shouldn’t. That’s why quite a few teams shun running QBs.
I understand, but that is the risk you take when you prioritize a QB with that skill set. You don't keep them from using their advantage, you just have to work with them to know how to protect themselves.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,395
Reaction score
29,778
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I understand, but that is the risk you take when you prioritize a QB with that skill set. You don't keep them from using their advantage, you just have to work with them to know how to protect themselves.

Yes. I think the idea is that the mobility can keep him effective and the team competitive as he learns the fine points of the position at the NFL level. There's no such thing as a 31-year old dual-threat QB.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,466
Location
Charlotte, NC
Yes. I think the idea is that the mobility can keep him effective and the team competitive as he learns the fine points of the position at the NFL level. There's no such thing as a 31-year old dual-threat QB.

Russell Wilson seven months from now. I keep waiting for Wilson to slow down and he hasn't yet.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,678
Posts
5,410,690
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top