Rapoport: Cardinals trading out of #3 very very likely

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,482
Reaction score
57,804
Location
SoCal
There's an argument to made that the 3 picks you get could fill the C, and 2 guards positions and they would be young, cost controlled and hopefully give the QB more time in the pocket giving the offense and advantage

I'm not saying to do it, but the argument is there
The odds of hitting on three lower first and second round picks is likely a lot lower than taking the stud passrusher at 3 and having him pan out.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,482
Reaction score
57,804
Location
SoCal
I might argue more, because LTs can really help QBs.
I’m split here. I get the value of stud LT. I think I place them third. Only because if the other parts of the line stink it won’t matter how good the anchor tackle is. Whereas you can move a passrusher around and his threat has to be gameplanned for regularly. He imoacts the game before it’s even begun.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,007
Reaction score
23,141
I’d be really hot if we make a trade before Chicago does.

Hopefully, the FO is just waiting to see if Chicago will trade for a team behind us. That way, we’re all but guaranteed Will Anderson.
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
63,122
Reaction score
28,338
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
The odds of hitting on three lower first and second round picks is likely a lot lower than taking the stud passrusher at 3 and having him pan out.
This is true

But there are some solid Oline men in those spots they are the type that could work

Just throwing it out there

Like I said, not in favor of this unless WA is gone
 

Zalixar

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
2,207
Reaction score
3,949
Location
OC
I’d be really hot if we make a trade before Chicago does.

Hopefully, the FO is just waiting to see if Chicago will trade for a team behind us. That way, we’re all but guaranteed Will Anderson.
There's no way we can "officially" trade before they do.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,486
Reaction score
34,456
Location
Charlotte, NC
I’m split here. I get the value of stud LT. I think I place them third. Only because if the other parts of the line stink it won’t matter how good the anchor tackle is. Whereas you can move a passrusher around and his threat has to be gameplanned for regularly. He imoacts the game before it’s even begun.
You can literally say the same thing for a pass rusher though.

Sure you can move him around, but offenses can adjust protection schemes.

OL win more reps overall and the really good ones rarely lose. That's why you'll see top LTs with a 95% pass block win rates.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,461
Reaction score
7,631
Will Anderson is the type of player offenses will have to gameplan for. Plus, you guys are missing the key fact, Bill Davis won't be here to ruin him.
An elite edge pass rusher is the number 1 thing a defense can have. Trading to fill holes like C, OG, or interior DL with serviceable players is ridiculous. Or do you want a decent C and OG and still have the likes of Marcus Golden trying to generate a pass rush?
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,486
Reaction score
34,456
Location
Charlotte, NC
Will Anderson is the type of player offenses will have to gameplan for. Plus, you guys are missing the key fact, Bill Davis won't be here to ruin him.
An elite edge pass rusher is the number 1 thing a defense can have. Trading to fill holes like C, OG, or interior DL with serviceable players is ridiculous. Or do you want a decent C and OG and still have the likes of Marcus Golden trying to generate a pass rush?
A competent coaching staff would have Sanders and Thomas playing more than 29% of snaps.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,482
Reaction score
57,804
Location
SoCal
You can literally say the same thing for a pass rusher though.

Sure you can move him around, but offenses can adjust protection schemes.

OL win more reps overall and the really good ones rarely lose. That's why you'll see top LTs with a 95% pass block win rates.
Correct, but a passrusher only needs to win once to perhaps change the outcome of the game.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,486
Reaction score
34,456
Location
Charlotte, NC
I expect both to be monumental busts.

Richardson was flat out terrible on film. Guy is an athlete, not a quarterback.
Oh I agree. But Lance just wasn't polished even to major college level.

Richardson wasn't even better than Emory Jones who stunk at ASU.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,290
Reaction score
11,366
Richardson, a great athlete and has a 53% completion rate.

Allen (Buffalo), a great athlete and had a 56% completion rate.

It's rare that a player improves on inaccuracy, not the norm

Also, Allen was a big time prospect going into his junior year and he wasn't surrounded by the level of talent Richardson had at Florida.

Richardson was terrible on film, his stock is going up because he is running around an empty field and throwing it to trainers.

This reminds me of when Yi Jianlian had his stock climb prior to the NBA draft because of his workout footwork while being guarded by... a chair...
 

QuebecCard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Posts
5,854
Reaction score
8,294
Location
North of the 49th.
It's rare that a player improves on inaccuracy, not the norm

Also, Allen was a big time prospect going into his junior year and he wasn't surrounded by the level of talent Richardson had at Florida.

Richardson was terrible on film, his stock is going up because he is running around an empty field and throwing it to trainers.

This reminds me of when Yi Jianlian had his stock climb prior to the NBA draft because of his workout footwork while being guarded by... a chair...

Fans say that...

But almost all the young guns in the NFL have higher completion percentages than in College.

Not saying he'll be a success, by the way.
 

rusfletcher

Veteran
Joined
Aug 26, 2002
Posts
151
Reaction score
130
It's rare that a player improves on inaccuracy, not the norm

Also, Allen was a big time prospect going into his junior year and he wasn't surrounded by the level of talent Richardson had at Florida.

Richardson was terrible on film, his stock is going up because he is running around an empty field and throwing it to trainers.

This reminds me of when Yi Jianlian had his stock climb prior to the NBA draft because of his workout footwork while being guarded by... a chair...
Although Richardson had better talent around him, he also went up against far superior competition versus Allen.
 
Top