Richard Sherman's head is going to explode

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
When Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman signed his big-money contract, Cardinals cornerback Patrick Peterson was happy. Not for Sherman, but for himself.
In Peterson’s mind, he’s worth a lot more than Sherman’s $57.4 million package. In Peterson’s mind, Sherman isn’t a shutdown corner.
“[Y]ou put [Sherman] in our system, I don’t believe he would last,” Peterson told Arizona Sports 98.7 FM. “Obviously, his job is much easier than mine.”
How so?
“If you look at their scheme and you look at our scheme, he’s a Cover-3 corner, period,” Peterson said. “A lot of guys say he’s a shutdown corner, but if you look at film and guys who understand the game, go back and look at film and see how his defense is.
“I believe if you put him in our system, I don’t think he’d be able to last, honestly, because I’m asked to do much more than he is.”

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/05/22/patrick-peterson-takes-aim-at-richard-sherman/
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,684
Reaction score
39,001
I agree that we ask PP to do more than Sherman does, PP is on an island often, Sherman isn't.

That said, Sherman is a better CB than PP right now, better against the run, and when he does get challenged, he responds. But considering how often we blitz and how often PP has no help, it is impossible to compare the 2, Seattle doesn't ask Sherman to cover a #1 WR on his own nearly as often as we do.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,759
Reaction score
16,528
I agree that we ask PP to do more than Sherman does, PP is on an island often, Sherman isn't.

That said, Sherman is a better CB than PP right now, better against the run, and when he does get challenged, he responds. But considering how often we blitz and how often PP has no help, it is impossible to compare the 2, Seattle doesn't ask Sherman to cover a #1 WR on his own nearly as often as we do.

This. It's all conjecture. PP may well be better if they were asked to do the same things but I think it's pretty clear that Sherman does his job extremely well, probably better than PP does his. Sherman talks a better game too. I just hope that PP tries to best him on the field rather than with the mouth.

Steve
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,459
Reaction score
68,705
Until PP shows anything being able to play the run like Sherman does/not getting abused four times a season by Pro-Bowlers and a scrub here and there, he should really stop talking.

I like the confidence, but he's got to show both of those things on the field before he can start running his mouth like that, IMO.
 
OP
OP
BigRedRage

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
Pp21 is a baller. No problem with his comments. Big year coming up. Talking provides more motivation to match your words

Sent from my XT1056 using Tapatalk
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,063
Reaction score
13,831
Holy crap reading this thread you would think Peterson was a scrub. I think we blitz on 50% of drop back plays. We lead the league in that. He's out there all by himself we ask him to be a shut down corner, return punts oh and play offense on occasion. Is anyone else in the league asked more of?
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,759
Reaction score
16,528
Holy crap reading this thread you would think Peterson was a scrub. I think we blitz on 50% of drop back plays. We lead the league in that. He's out there all by himself we ask him to be a shut down corner, return punts oh and play offense on occasion. Is anyone else in the league asked more of?

I always love comments like this, ones that are so divorced from reality that you can't even write them off as hyperbole.

Steve
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,459
Reaction score
68,705
I always love comments like this, ones that are so divorced from reality that you can't even write them off as hyperbole.

Steve

agreed. Peterson is a very very good CB, but defensively, Sherman does everything. I could care less what Peterson does on offense/punt returns (which was next to nothing). we're talking purely about defense and right now, Sherman's shown to have a bigger impact in all areas of the field defensively.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,063
Reaction score
13,831
agreed. Peterson is a very very good CB, but defensively, Sherman does everything. I could care less what Peterson does on offense/punt returns (which was next to nothing). we're talking purely about defense and right now, Sherman's shown to have a bigger impact in all areas of the field defensively.

So scheme has nothing to do with it
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,459
Reaction score
68,705
So scheme has nothing to do with it

Never said that but keep putting words in people's mouths. Sure scheming it has something to do with it, but I've seen PP burned too many times and give up big games against both Pro-Bowlers and scrubs to say he's at Sherman's level right now. The guy is the best in the game. Peterson's still trying to get there. And as far as run support, you can't really make an argument here, can you? Sherman's ferocious there while Peterson is mediocre at best.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,063
Reaction score
13,831
Never said that but keep putting words in people's mouths. Sure scheming it has something to do with it, but I've seen PP burned too many times and give up big games against both Pro-Bowlers and scrubs to say he's at Sherman's level right now. The guy is the best in the game. Peterson's still trying to get there. And as far as run support, you can't really make an argument here, can you? Sherman's ferocious there while Peterson is mediocre at best.

I'm not putting words in anyone's mouth it was a question. I think everyone who knows football knows what Peterson is asked to do in this scheme is allot harder to do that what Sherman in his scheme is asked to do.

The cardinals had the number #1 run defense in the league last year. The best corner of all time Prime Time avoided it at all cost i'm still taking him on my team everyday. Run support is nice but that's not what I look for in a corner that's what my defensive line, linebackers and SS is there for. A corner isn't really important against the run.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
Agree with AZStevenCal, to some extent, that Sherman does what he's supposed to do better than PP does. The schemes do make a ton of difference however. Sherman's teammates have more of an impact on his game in a cover 3 than PP's teammates do playing man. Sherman always has help and he's rarely going to get beat over the top, while still able to jump routes because of the safety help. There's simply more opportunity to "trick" a QB or offensive system. Even the deep safeties position and leverage give Sherman possible help. This doesn't even take into account LB positioning and shading, which can force a receiver where Sherman wants him to go.

It's a misnomer that PP always covers the best receiver though--he covers more man than anyone else, but it's still under 60% on their best receiver the last I read. The problem is that he's still man2man and easily picked out by the QB and coordinators. There's little hiding and little bluffing. If he jumps a route and misses, it's going to the house. I'm one of those people saying Sherman has better technique, while PP is better athletically, but that is debatable, given that it takes such patience and fundamental technique to play that way as often as he does. PP has to be a lot more disciplined than Sherman and that indicates a high level of technique and professionalism.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,013
Reaction score
21,148
Location
South Bay
Cards were #1 in defending the team's top-end WR. PP's job is to cover the opposition's top WR. Sherman covers one side of the field.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,459
Reaction score
68,705
I'm not putting words in anyone's mouth it was a question. I think everyone who knows football knows what Peterson is asked to do in this scheme is allot harder to do that what Sherman in his scheme is asked to do.

The cardinals had the number #1 run defense in the league last year. The best corner of all time Prime Time avoided it at all cost i'm still taking him on my team everyday.

that's great, but PP isn't nearly in the same class as Deion as far as complete shutdown corners. you might take that as another "slam" calling him a scrub, but it's far from it. I don't think ANYONE is close to what Deion was able to accomplish as a pure lockdown corner.

Run support is nice but that's not what I look for in a corner that's what my defensive line, linebackers and SS is there for. A corner isn't really important against the run.

Okay...but being able to play it IS part of a CB's game and PP doesn't excel there at all.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,459
Reaction score
68,705
Agree with AZStevenCal, to some extent, that Sherman does what he's supposed to do better than PP does. The schemes do make a ton of difference however. Sherman's teammates have more of an impact on his game in a cover 3 than PP's teammates do playing man. Sherman always has help and he's rarely going to get beat over the top, while still able to jump routes because of the safety help. There's simply more opportunity to "trick" a QB or offensive system. Even the deep safeties position and leverage give Sherman possible help. This doesn't even take into account LB positioning and shading, which can force a receiver where Sherman wants him to go.

It's a misnomer that PP always covers the best receiver though--he covers more man than anyone else, but it's still under 60% on their best receiver the last I read. The problem is that he's still man2man and easily picked out by the QB and coordinators. There's little hiding and little bluffing. If he jumps a route and misses, it's going to the house. I'm one of those people saying Sherman has better technique, while PP is better athletically, but that is debatable, given that it takes such patience and fundamental technique to play that way as often as he does. PP has to be a lot more disciplined than Sherman and that indicates a high level of technique and professionalism.

agreed.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,063
Reaction score
13,831
that's great, but PP isn't nearly in the same class as Deion as far as complete shutdown corners. you might take that as another "slam" calling him a scrub, but it's far from it. I don't think ANYONE is close to what Deion was able to accomplish as a pure lockdown corner.



Okay...but being able to play it IS part of a CB's game and PP doesn't excel there at all.

I didn't say he was in his class or as good as him I was pointing out the guy who is pretty much regarded as the greatest man in the history of the game to play the position avoided it as much as humanly possible that alone tells me it must not be important to the position
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,668
Location
CA
I just wish PP would not get caught up and drawn into this bologna.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,477
Reaction score
16,651
Location
San Antonio, Texas
It does not matter what PP says or how Sherman retaliates to it... when PP gets the bigger contract, then Sherman's head will spin into another dimension lol
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,894
Reaction score
4,849
Location
Iowa
It doesn't matter who is the best cornerback.

It DOES matter who has the best overall scoring defense, who wins the NFC West, who wins the Super Bowl. Right now the Seattle Seahawks own those distinctions. It's up to the Cardinals to knock the bullies off their perch this season and not get caught up in individual pi$$ing contests IMO.

"Team is what it takes".
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,331
I just wish PP would not get caught up and drawn into this bologna.

It doesn't matter who is the best cornerback.

It DOES matter who has the best overall scoring defense, who wins the NFC West, who wins the Super Bowl. Right now the Seattle Seahawks own those distinctions. It's up to the Cardinals to knock the bullies off their perch this season and not get caught up in individual pi$$ing contests IMO.

"Team is what it takes".

I agree gentlemen. PP could have worded his comments far more non confrontational and still gotten his point across. Fitz would have found a way to do it.
 

MoeIsBetter

SPA Co-Commishioner
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Posts
1,250
Reaction score
26
Location
Surprise, AZ
I have no problem with PP's response. I want an old fashioned rivalry. I hope that this lights a spark under our receiving core to go out there and tear Sherman apart, just to prove PP is the better receiver. This team gravitates towards PP. Let's get out there and talk some ****!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,880
Posts
5,412,385
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top