Should we trade with Denver?

sportznutt

Canadian Card
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
3,334
Reaction score
177
With no immediate needs outside of the offensive line and perhaps the secondary, should we trade with Denver for their 2 1st rounders?
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,589
Reaction score
5,436
Location
Fort Myers
Nope. This draft probably only has 10-12 elite players, why trade down and miss out on one of those guys?
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
Makes logical sense (and works out fairly closely on the Draft Value chart). But it's too early to rush to judgment. We don't know who might fall to us at #10 on draft day. And we don't know if Denver has any reason to trade two later picks in order to jump to #10.

Best thing we can do is wait til draft day and see what materializes. For example:

If Ferguson, Hawk or Young (many would include Vern Davis) were available at #10, I'd keep the pick because I think any of them could help us more than two guys we could pick later (Kind of a Suggs vs. Pace/Johnson value judgment).

If all of them were gone and Denver wanted to deal up, I'd probably do the deal, but would probably want to conduct several alternative mocks to better gauge the probabilites that specific players would be available at #22 and #29 (and whether there were acceptable fall-back picks should the guys we want be gone).

Guys I'd consider targeting with those two picks would include: Mangold, Marcus McNeal, Jean-Gilles Carpenter, Bunkley, Lutui, Watson (and if some of the higher rated players like Greenway, Huff or Jimmy Williams somehow fell down to #22 or #29, they'd have to be considered also).
 

Redrage

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 4, 2003
Posts
1,008
Reaction score
65
Location
Charlotte, NC
i certainly think that this year's draft is better than '03, but I'd rather stand pat and get an elite player at 10.
 

Goodyear Card

Link Guy
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Posts
2,247
Reaction score
1,930
Zeno said:
Nope. This draft probably only has 10-12 elite players, why trade down and miss out on one of those guys?

I think 10-12 elite players is a little high. I would say 7 or 8. If one of top players slips to the #10 spot we should take him. Otherwise, tried down and pick up an extra up extra second round pick.
 

imaCafan

Next stop, Hall of Fame!
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
3,634
Reaction score
1,004
Location
Needles, Ca.
How about we keep #10 and move up from round 2 to the bottom of round 1 like we evidently tried to do to get Gamble. What does the value chart say about moving up to around pick #24?
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,509
Reaction score
7,771
No, i hate trading down. Especially if you're trading down that far from a top 10 pick. There's too many variables to think a player you're targeting will be there. When they did the dreaded trade down with the Saints they had Jerome McDougal as their target and Philly traded up in front of them to nab him.Sit at 10 and choose from Huff, Hawk, Davis,Justice, or Jimmy Williams.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
Zeno said:
Nope. This draft probably only has 10-12 elite players, why trade down and miss out on one of those guys?

I agree - this will be the last yr. we have a high draft choice (hopefully) for some time. Lets make it a good one.

I'm on for Young or Cutler, Justice or Huff.
 

CorporalCardinal

Look! A Cards fan in Iraq
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Posts
907
Reaction score
0
Location
Somewhere in the Desert.....Iraq
If we do trade down we should use picks 22 and 29 to grab starters for the line. In the second we could take maybe take Klopfenstein or Fassano (whichever we feel can play now and has better upside). And why not take a crack at Bodie Croyle in the third to be a backup and learn behind Warner?
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
JeffGollin said:
Makes logical sense (and works out fairly closely on the Draft Value chart). But it's too early to rush to judgment. We don't know who might fall to us at #10 on draft day. And we don't know if Denver has any reason to trade two later picks in order to jump to #10.

Best thing we can do is wait til draft day and see what materializes. For example:

If Ferguson, Hawk or Young (many would include Vern Davis) were available at #10, I'd keep the pick because I think any of them could help us more than two guys we could pick later (Kind of a Suggs vs. Pace/Johnson value judgment).

If all of them were gone and Denver wanted to deal up, I'd probably do the deal, but would probably want to conduct several alternative mocks to better gauge the probabilites that specific players would be available at #22 and #29 (and whether there were acceptable fall-back picks should the guys we want be gone).

Guys I'd consider targeting with those two picks would include: Mangold, Marcus McNeal, Jean-Gilles Carpenter, Bunkley, Lutui, Watson (and if some of the higher rated players like Greenway, Huff or Jimmy Williams somehow fell down to #22 or #29, they'd have to be considered also).

I like Pope around 22. But I think we'll keep the pick. Denver probobly likes having two 1sts and they need a WR. There are none at the top. If we'd have landed Randle-El we probobly could have moved BJ to them, but as of now that's not happening.
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,589
Reaction score
5,436
Location
Fort Myers
Denver is talking about trying to get Abraham anyway so they may not have 2 first rounders by the time draft day comes around.

I don't think trading down is a great idea. If we really want a rookie OL there is a great chance one projected to go in round 1 will fall to us in round 2. Last year some people had Elton Brown as a first round projection and he fell all the way to round 4.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
Zeno said:
Denver is talking about trying to get Abraham anyway so they may not have 2 first rounders by the time draft day comes around.

I don't think trading down is a great idea. If we really want a rookie OL there is a great chance one projected to go in round 1 will fall to us in round 2. Last year some people had Elton Brown as a first round projection and he fell all the way to round 4.

With good reason. He has alot of rough edges. He won't probobly start off this yr. as a starter. Most passed on him for a reason. He lacks technique.Hopefully the new line coach will be able to help him out.
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,669
Location
CA
Quick question:

If all 3 qb's, Bush, and Davis, huff, and hawk are all off the board @ 10, do we still draft Lendale White?

It seems we may lose Shipp and Edge will probably finish his career with the Cards, so should we still draft White for future tandem with JJ or for JJ insurance?

I would be inclined to say, "Yes."
 

Evil Ash

Henchman Supreme
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Posts
9,756
Reaction score
1,980
Location
On a flying cocoon
LoyaltyisaCurse said:
Quick question:

If all 3 qb's, Bush, and Davis, huff, and hawk are all off the board @ 10, do we still draft Lendale White?

It seems we may lose Shipp and Edge will probably finish his career with the Cards, so should we still draft White for future tandem with JJ or for JJ insurance?

I would be inclined to say, "Yes."

If we drafted Lendale I would vomit.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
If they trade down for 2 picks they could take Bryant Johnson and Calvin Pace.
 

ThunderCard

Registered User
Joined
Nov 10, 2003
Posts
1,679
Reaction score
21
Location
Denver
I don't think Denver would do the trade anyways due to the fact that they will probably be sending a 1st rounder to the Jets for Abraham.
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
IMO Green would never trade down as his story on draft day reads BPA. This year we will take the highest player ranked on our board when the ticker starts for our pick. If this rings true look at the top ten to twelve players and eliminate the sure shots on top like the Brick, Lienart etc. You could pretty much nail it.DAvis, AJ , young could be there to be picked at ten.

GBR
40
 

CardShark

DEAL WITH IT!
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Posts
2,584
Reaction score
0
Location
Florence, Arizona
Green stated in his first Cardinals draft that he would never trade out of the top 10 as you would miss the chance to land a blue chip player. If I remember correctly, he also wouldn't move up if he was already in the top 10.
 

CardShark

DEAL WITH IT!
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Posts
2,584
Reaction score
0
Location
Florence, Arizona
I'd be willing to swap our 2nd and 3rd round picks for their 2nd and 3rd round picks for their first pick.

I'd also give them the choice of B. Johnson, M. Shipp or A. Bergen. Maybe all of them.

Of course this would have to be a draft day trade to see if we could land Vernon Davis.

With their pick I would hope to land Jimmy Williams.
 

Second Deck

Registered
Joined
Jul 1, 2002
Posts
938
Reaction score
0
Since my Lendle White horse has left the stable I would not be suprised to see the Cards take Davis at ten. With the success KC has had with Gonzalez I think our OC would love Davis.
 

NEZCardsfan

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Posts
9,388
Reaction score
4
I thought Dennis said he wanted to upgrade the LBs this year. With Edge signing I don't see us drafting Peterson.

I'd say we draft Hawk if he slides, but more likely Greenway.
 

Zeno

Ancient
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
15,589
Reaction score
5,436
Location
Fort Myers
NEZCardsfan said:
I thought Dennis said he wanted to upgrade the LBs this year. With Edge signing I don't see us drafting Peterson.

I'd say we draft Hawk if he slides, but more likely Greenway.

I'm sure you meant signing Peterson. Not sure how much he'll cost. Denny mentioned adding to the secondary(in FA) and didn't say anything about LB this morning on ESPN.

The 2 guys Denny mentioned today on Cold Pizza were Hawk and Davis, specifically mentioning about how impressive a guy Davis' size could run so fast.

Greenway if we traded down 10 spots maybe. He had a terrible workout and I don't think he was ever really a top 10 guy to begin with.
 

NEZCardsfan

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Posts
9,388
Reaction score
4
Zeno said:
I'm sure you meant signing Peterson. Not sure how much he'll cost. Denny mentioned adding to the secondary(in FA) and didn't say anything about LB this morning on ESPN.

The 2 guys Denny mentioned today on Cold Pizza were Hawk and Davis, specifically mentioning about how impressive a guy Davis' size could run so fast.

Greenway if we traded down 10 spots maybe. He had a terrible workout and I don't think he was ever really a top 10 guy to begin with.

IF we trade with Denver....I'd like to see the picks be Ernie Sims and Mangold. I personally am not huge on Sims....but DG is big on FSU guys.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,062
Posts
5,431,320
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top