Stout
Hold onto the ball, Murray!
I would argue that while there is limited sample size, the sample size we do have points to greatness.
It's like DJ Humphries said, this kid had been cool since he was 4 years old. His dad said when he was 5 years old he would get him to go outside to throw the football. Few QBs can say they have have an expert QB coach working with them since they were a small child.
The guy has lost THREE football games in his life. Three. At all levels. But as others have pointed out, his extensive baseball background will prepare him for failure, since you fail at baseball more than any other sport.
I'm not going to make a big deal about his preseason performance because he met my minimum expectations. He can play a lot better than he did. When he avoided that sack, few players can do what he did, the way he moved. Hes special.
IMO all this talk about faster defenders points to one thing: teams are going to need faster, more mobile QBs to deal with them. Watson, Mahomes, Wilson, Newton, Jackson...this is the way of the future. It's not running QBs...its mobile QBs...the ones who run too much are going to hurt their team in the long run.
Should've known! 1 preseason game and "the sample size points to greatness."
In all seriousness, Krang, I love how you post. If everyone agreed here I'd choke on sunshine and daisies. We need something to banter about.