Good points but just about every pick outside the top 3 are considered huge crap shoots compared to a consensus #1 pick in Duncan. I don't think the draft choices are really comparable. So, picking Duncan probably wasn't "savvy" but you do have to evaluate who is left on the board after #3 and do some pretty good scouting to try and find the diamond in the rough.
By the way, I don't think Dan fell in love with the 3 point late in his career. I think he evolved into that type of player out of necessity. He couldn't jump or move the way he wanted to offensively late in his career.
Agreed.
Wasn't his knee giving him trouble at some point?