Really guys? Come on. He is taking a humorous approach to critiquing someone who obviously didn't pay attention during the movie or lacks a basic understanding of Star Wars. It would be one thing if the original review was just a difference of opinion. One of the things that prompted his "review of the reviewer" is because in many cases above, the guy didn't pay attention. You guys either didn't pick up on that or didn't read the entire thing.
I agree with you that simply because someone didn't like the movie shouldn't prompt vitriol. This CLEARLY is not a case of simple fanboyism. I mean....seriously....they guy didn't pay one lick of attention in the movie then posted a review. Not to mention that Huffingpost.com has another writer who posted another critique of the film and AGAIN clearly didn't pay attention.
I could care less if those two reviewers didn't like the movie. If he was simply ripping someone for not having the same opinion I would be right there with you. However, I am now starting to think those two writers might be the worst in the business if they can't pay attention during a movie they are reviewing. Isn't that their job?
I agree with you that simply because someone didn't like the movie shouldn't prompt vitriol. This CLEARLY is not a case of simple fanboyism. I mean....seriously....they guy didn't pay one lick of attention in the movie then posted a review. Not to mention that Huffingpost.com has another writer who posted another critique of the film and AGAIN clearly didn't pay attention.
I could care less if those two reviewers didn't like the movie. If he was simply ripping someone for not having the same opinion I would be right there with you. However, I am now starting to think those two writers might be the worst in the business if they can't pay attention during a movie they are reviewing. Isn't that their job?
Last edited: