Suns 2024-2025 Season Discussions

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,373
Reaction score
12,552
Location
Tempe, AZ
It should be noted it’s unlikely another team would take on his salary.

The no-trade only says he has to be okay with his new destination.

No trade clauses are bad. I can see it at the end of someone's career like if LeBron wanted one in LA now or Nash had wanted one in his last years here. Before a player is essentially 2-3 years from retiring though it's foolish to give them that leverage. I wouldn't even give Booker one if he asked now. 35+ Years of age would keep issues of it being a negative asset down.


To be fair, I see nothing wrong with handshake deals. If Ishbia and Book had one, I'd respect it and if either side broke the terms then I'd take the side of the one who didn't. To write it into a legally binding contract is too much, IMO.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,154
Reaction score
6,607
The Suns really are financially in a bind. Absolutely no way out. I was thinking that Dunn's immediate emergence, the fact that he hit the ground running, creates pressure to hurry up and trade Beal for being not vitally important. But they can't, because of his no-trade clause. I certainly wouldn't trade one of the other two stars.
Not sure why a rookie forward emerging quickly means we need to trade Beal. If anything his emergence along with signing such good PGs for so cheap buys us time from having to make a move. While Beal's contract is a bit of an anchor he does at least give us a legitimate 3rd scoring threat and if he can be moved to the bench without drama he could be a damn good 6th man. If Beal continues to have injury issues than Dunn's emergence (along with picking up guys like Tyus and Monte) means that we can shoulder that loss more seamlessly.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,100
Reaction score
58,434
Just something I noticed early is that Beal has been stuck in a corner since he’s no longer the point guard.

I think Beal shooting more threes is my choice and running Bud's system.

He likes to get in the lane and create. Some of those point guard habits tend to die hard.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,717
Reaction score
10,617
Just something I noticed early is that Beal has been stuck in a corner since he’s no longer the point guard.
Yeah, that's not really surprising. Tyus brings the ball up and booker and KD will be the wings - he pretty much has to start in the corner with those guys in the lineup.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,717
Reaction score
10,617
I think Beal shooting more threes is my choice and running Bud's system.

He likes to get in the lane and create. Some of those point guard habits tend to die hard.
This is the fundamental problem with the team - he does not fit.

He would somewhat fit if he is used as the 6th man - but even if that was done - the cap space would be better utilized on other positions when we already have Grayson and Book as SG's that demand playing time.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,458
Reaction score
68,700
This is the fundamental problem with the team - he does not fit.

He would somewhat fit if he is used as the 6th man - but even if that was done - the cap space would be better utilized on other positions when we already have Grayson and Book as SG's that demand playing time.
If Beal’s healthy, he demands playing time over Grayson. That dude is never shooting the rock like that again. He’s a good shooter… 40% from three, but last year was an all time season. It wasn’t the norm nor should we expect it to be.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,717
Reaction score
10,617
If Beal’s healthy, he demands playing time over Grayson. That dude is never shooting the rock like that again. He’s a good shooter… 40% from three, but last year was an all time season. It wasn’t the norm nor should we expect it to be.
If Beal's role is to sit in the corner and wait to shoot a 3 most of the time - who is better at that - Grayson or Beal.

With Book and KD both on the floor we are never going to get the full value out of Beal - especially because he makes us undersized and worse at defense and rebounding than someone like Dunn or another forward.

I guess what I am saying is that both Dunn or Grayson would be a better starter than Beal, but unfortunately due to his contract and ego we aren't going to do that.
 
Last edited:

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,154
Reaction score
6,607
If Beal's role is to sit in the corner and wait to shoot a 3 most of the time - who is better at that - Grayson or Beal.

With Book and KD both on the floor we are never going to get the full value out of Beal - especially because he makes us undersized and worse at defense and rebounding than someone like Dunn or another forward.

I guess what I am saying is that both Dunn or Grayson would be a better starter than Beal, but unfortunately due to his contract and ego we aren't going to do that.
I see your point, but who is more likely to attack the inevitable close outs? Beal may not be quite as good of a spot up shooter as Allen, but he is much better when asked to attack close outs.
 
Last edited:

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,717
Reaction score
10,617
If Beal’s healthy, he demands playing time over Grayson. That dude is never shooting the rock like that again. He’s a good shooter… 40% from three, but last year was an all time season. It wasn’t the norm nor should we expect it to be.
Grayson may not shoot 47% again but I bet you he still will shoot 42-45% this year.
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,717
Reaction score
10,617
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I know people will not believe this from me, but I actually believe this is possible if Dunn keeps playing like this. I think he is that important.

OKC is clearly number 1, but I think we can compete with Dallas and Minnesota for 2nd.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,458
Reaction score
68,700
If Beal's role is to sit in the corner and wait to shoot a 3 most of the time - who is better at that - Grayson or Beal.

Huh? The convo was about how good Beal would be off the bench. That’s what his role should be because it’s a waste for him to just be on the corner and be a mid-defender at best.

And Allen should be nowhere near the starting lineup. He’s a good bench player and having a backcourt of him and Beal off the bench I think would be ideal.

With Book and KD both on the floor we are never going to get the full value out of Beal - especially because he makes us undersized and worse at defense and rebounding than someone like Dunn or another forward.

I guess what I am saying is that both Dunn or Grayson would be a better starter than Beal, but unfortunately due to his contract and ego we aren't going to do that.

I think almost everyone agrees with that, but if somehow we could transition him to the bench, his impact on second unit should stand in front of Grayson’s.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,154
Reaction score
6,607
I know people will not believe this from me, but I actually believe this is possible if Dunn keeps playing like this. I think he is that important.

OKC is clearly number 1, but I think we can compete with Dallas and Minnesota for 2nd.
I mean they did win 49 games last year with less depth and no point guards. They should certainly win at least 50+ games as long as they don't have major injury issues.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,458
Reaction score
68,700
I know people will not believe this from me, but I actually believe this is possible if Dunn keeps playing like this. I think he is that important.

OKC is clearly number 1, but I think we can compete with Dallas and Minnesota for 2nd.

Yeah… if he is a good rotation player, that plugs a glaring hole this team has.

And it probably allows them to use Allen/Royce and picks to try and get another serviceable big at some point.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,458
Reaction score
68,700
I mean they did win 49 games last year with less depth and no point guards. They should certainly win at least 50+ games as long as they don't have major injury issues.
We got pretty lucky with KD last year though. Wouldn’t surprise me to see him fall back to only about 55-60 games this season.

But they’re definitely better on paper.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,154
Reaction score
6,607
We got pretty lucky with KD last year though. Wouldn’t surprise me to see him fall back to only about 55-60 games this season.

But they’re definitely better on paper.
True. We also have to consider them adjusting to Bud's style of offense. We should be top 5 in three point attempts this year and we were just 24th last year. That is a pretty major change in philosophy, but one that I imagine the players will embrace.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,419
Reaction score
16,935
Location
Round Rock, TX
We haven't seen the final version of Bud's offense.

The only thing that has been abundantly clear is that Bol Bol STILL parks in the corner on every offensive possession. I would hope that changes at least a little bit with coach Bud.
 

ASUCHRIS

ONE HEART BEAT!!!
Joined
Sep 2, 2002
Posts
16,544
Reaction score
14,734
I know people will not believe this from me, but I actually believe this is possible if Dunn keeps playing like this. I think he is that important.

OKC is clearly number 1, but I think we can compete with Dallas and Minnesota for 2nd.
I wouldn't be that surprised at all...would be a classic Suns team. (Undersized regular season beasts that get beat up in the playoffs)

I think Dallas and Minnesota will take a step back this year.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,458
Reaction score
68,700
I wouldn't be that surprised at all...would be a classic Suns team. (Undersized regular season beasts that get beat up in the playoffs)

I think Dallas and Minnesota will take a step back this year.

Yeah… even if the offense comes together and we’re pretty healthy, we’re a solid Big away from being able to really matchup with Minnesota or OKC. Dallas is more of a toss-up for me if the O is running on all cylinders.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,875
Posts
5,411,984
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top