- Joined
- Jan 2, 2003
- Posts
- 91,430
- Reaction score
- 68,611
You're not wrong that I want to believe things have changed but I'm trying to be open minded on it and I'll admit, it's a real challenge to defend Sarver. But much of what I read on the attacking side is garbage. Take Sarver and the Suns out of the picture and I believe I'd be challenging these "reports" anyway.
That doesn't mean Sarver isn't a problem or THE problem. But I hear Amin say something one day and then days or weeks later I hear Woj or Rachel Nichols or Windhorst repeat almost the exact same thing. I KNOW Amin has heavily influenced the ESPN gang (and Barkley) against Sarver. What I don't know is whether it's justified or not. There's so much smoke it's difficult to think it's not supportable but one person with an agenda can create an awful lot of smoke.
seems like a stretch that Amin could poison the well for a bunch of very respected journalists who's credibility is staked on them being right more often than wrong.