Suns Heat Griz Three-team trade

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
I think I just broke the trade machine adding players, trying to get salaries to match.
 

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
Got it;

PHX
Gay
Marion

MIA
Stoudemire

MEM
Dudley
Beasley
Picks?
 

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,719
Reaction score
7,126
Got it;

PHX
Gay
Marion

MIA
Stoudemire

MEM
Dudley
Beasley
Picks?

That's horrible and doesn't work under the cap. Now we have 4 small forwards.

Nash, Barbs
Richardson
Gay, Hill, Barnes
Marion, Amundson, Dudley
Shaq, Lopez

We'd have to get Chalmers, Memphis' unprotected first rounder and pray for Blake Griffin for me to do that.
 

AceP

Registered
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Posts
941
Reaction score
0
Why do we get 2 SFs back by trading a PF? Who to play our starting PF then? Marion? Amundson? How do we make Gay and Marion co-exist? Meawhile, get rid of both Hill and Barnes? ...

This doesn't make any sense basketball wise.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,238
Reaction score
11,830
Rudy Gay and Marion?

To go with Jason Richardson, Hill, and Barbosa?

Pass.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
39,913
Reaction score
30,999
Location
Scottsdale, Az
They discussed this on the radio. The Suns would be getting Beasley not Marion.
 

PHX04

Rookie
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Posts
66
Reaction score
0
Rudy Gay and Marion?

To go with Jason Richardson, Hill, and Barbosa?

Pass.

This

Hill came here to be a starter..and him coming off the bench is not good..as we seen what porter did in the begining of the year
 
OP
OP
L

lou_skywalker

Registered
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Posts
511
Reaction score
0
maybe thats why they switched it around to make the salaries work
and thats why Kerr talked to Dudley earlier today :p
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,190
Reaction score
15,179
Location
Arizona
Horrible trade. You would be getting back 2 SF in the deal. They are basically the same player. They both play both SF and PF. Even if the Suns get Beasley it's still not a great trade.

Defense
Gay is a better defender at the SF then playing PF. When Gay plays PF he allows allows 19.4 PPG which is only slightly better then Amare's 20.4.

Marion is in the same boat. He plays better defense at the SF (which his numbers are not good this year). When Marion plays PF he allows 21.8 PPG which is worse then Amare.

Beasley is the worst defender of the 3. He allows 26.2 PPG which is horrible.

Rebounding
Rudy sucks at rebounding.

Marion is only slightly better then Amare this year.

Beasley sucks at rebounding too.


Turnovers
Gay and Amare are both 2 of the worst forwards in the NBA with total turnovers and turnovers per game. No improvement there...probably a tad worse.

Beasley does take care of the basketball which is the only positive I see here.

Overall
We have to get better at rebounding, defense and turnovers. If the Suns do this deal, they don't get better at defense or rebounding. From a turnover perspective it's probably a wash because we get better at turnovers at the PF position, only to shift them over to the SF position in Gay.

Horrible deal.
 
Last edited:

Folster

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Posts
16,719
Reaction score
7,126

Wow it does! But there is no way Sarver back an additional 4.2 million in salary, 8.4 after the LT. That's why I think Marion coming back here is impossible. Marion contract alone is 2.8 million more than Amar'e. Plus reacquiring Marion looks really bad for both Kerr and Sarver.

Suns send out Amare and Dudley, a combined 16.2 mil.
Suns receive Marion and Gay, a combined 20.4 mil.

Not gonna happen.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
Wow it does! But there is no way Sarver back an additional 4.2 million in salary, 8.4 after the LT. That's why I think Marion coming back here is impossible. Marion contract alone is 2.8 million more than Amar'e. Plus reacquiring Marion looks really bad for both Kerr and Sarver.

Suns send out Amare and Dudley, a combined 16.2 mil.
Suns receive Marion and Gay, a combined 20.4 mil.

Not gonna happen.

The key is Marion's deal drops off after the season.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,340
Reaction score
9,391
Location
L.A. area
That's horrible and doesn't work under the cap. Now we have 4 small forwards.

Marion has been playing more PF than SF the last few years, even in Miami, so he could do it again. Besides, it's only for a few months. And Barnes is horrible, so anything that reduces his minutes is a win as far as I'm concerned.

This trade certainly would not make the Suns better now, and it wouldn't bring in much promise either -- Gay is a decent consolation prize, but that's about it. Also, it brings the Suns' salary way up for this season. Either the details are wrong or this is completely bogus.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
Horrible trade. You would be getting back 2 SF in the deal. They are basically the same player. They both play both SF and PF. Even if the Suns get Beasley it's still not a great trade.

Defense
Gay is a better defender at the SF then playing PF. When Gay plays PF he allows allows 19.4 PPG which is only slightly better then Amare's 20.4.

Marion is in the same boat. He plays better defense at the SF (which his numbers are not good this year). When Marion plays PF he allows 21.8 PPG which is worse then Amare.

Beasley is the worst defender of the 3. He allows 26.2 PPG which is horrible.

Rebounding
Rudy sucks at rebounding.

Marion is only slightly better then Amare this year.

Beasley sucks at rebounding too.


Turnovers
Gay and Amare are both 2 of the worst forwards in the NBA with total turnovers and turnovers per game. No improvement there...probably a tad worse.

Beasley does take care of the basketball which is the only positive I see here.

Overall
We have to get better at rebounding, defense and turnovers. If the Suns do this deal, they don't get better at defense or rebounding. From a turnover perspective it's probably a wash because we get better at turnovers at the PF position, only to shift them over to the SF position in Gay.

Horrible deal.

Dude you seem to be the only one that doesn't understand that the team is not making a push for the playoffs or the ring this season or next. They could care less if the team is 10 SF's as long as 1 of them is a prospect and the other nine's contract drops off after the season.

You can keep breaking it down Hubie Brown style but whatever the team gets back theoritically in this trade is going to be for cap space and prospects.

I don't think anything is going to happen except a change of coach personally. But if we can get Beasley AND Gay.....well then you would have to consider that IMO.
 

TheKid_1

Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Posts
401
Reaction score
0
All moot points now because Marion has just been traded to Toronto for JO.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,190
Reaction score
15,179
Location
Arizona
Dude you seem to be the only one that doesn't understand that the team is not making a push for the playoffs or the ring this season or next. They could care less if the team is 10 SF's as long as 1 of them is a prospect and the other nine's contract drops off after the season.

You can keep breaking it down Hubie Brown style but whatever the team gets back theoritically in this trade is going to be for cap space and prospects.

I don't think anything is going to happen except a change of coach personally. But if we can get Beasley AND Gay.....well then you would have to consider that IMO.

Dude you seem to be the only one that doesn't understand that regardless if your making a push to the playoffs, you have to set up a good foundation to build your team on.

What prospects are you referring to? Building around Gay and Beasley is a solid foundation??? You have got to be kidding.

Now factor in that any picks you get out of the deal are iffy at best.

I have ZERO problem with this team rebuilding. However, if your going to trade away Amare you MUST get a younger player that improves your team at the very least on the defensive end.

This is moot anyway. Marion just wen to the Raptors along with Banks.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
On the air, they said the deal is actually for Beasley not Marion. So, there is NOTHING about this trade that I like.

I don't understand why. Gay and Beasley are LEGIT prospects at the 3 and 4 (no matter what you think their defeciencies are rebounding and defensive wise) and then there will be cap space once Shaq/Nash drops off.

That gives you two years to evauate them and see if they are pieces you want to build around.

Suns fans I think we have to come to grips that this is going to be a post -Steph trade season or two to get back in that upper echelon.

Personally I hope Sarver either sells the team or sells his soul so we can get DWade here.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,190
Reaction score
15,179
Location
Arizona
I don't understand why. Gay and Beasley are LEGIT prospects at the 3 and 4 (no matter what you think their defeciencies are rebounding and defensive wise) and then there will be cap space once Shaq/Nash drops off.

I just don't get it. What is coming in is worse then what is going out. It's not what I think. The proof is in the play. Plus, you really think anybody is going to get more out of Beasley then Pat Riley???? Keep in mind that Pat Riley was desperate to trade out of the #2 pick to avoid taking Beasley and had no takers. Now is willing to send him packing. That sounds like a solid prospect?

Fact: Beasley is a worse defender then Amare.
Fact: Gay has a bigger turnover problem then Amare.
Fact: Neither is a better rebounder then Amare.

You might as well just keep Amare because he is better then either of those guys.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
551,973
Posts
5,393,473
Members
6,313
Latest member
50 year card fan
Top