Suns show interest in Hakim Warrick

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,997
Reaction score
5,243
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
By Marc Stein
The Phoenix Suns are showing the most interest in athletic power forward Hakim Warrick and have begun exchanging potential salary figures with Warrick’s representatives, according to sources close to the situation.

New York and Denver have also expressed initial interest, sources said.

Warrick himself, meanwhile, is said to still have some interest in re-signing in Chicago, where he finished last season after a midseason trade with Milwaukee. But the Bulls’ obvious first priority is their ongoing pursuit of multiple marquee free agents.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,254
Reaction score
59,869
By Marc Stein
The Phoenix Suns are showing the most interest in athletic power forward Hakim Warrick and have begun exchanging potential salary figures with Warrick’s representatives, according to sources close to the situation.

New York and Denver have also expressed initial interest, sources said.

Warrick himself, meanwhile, is said to still have some interest in re-signing in Chicago, where he finished last season after a midseason trade with Milwaukee. But the Bulls’ obvious first priority is their ongoing pursuit of multiple marquee free agents.

About time the Suns start shopping for a PF.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
Is he coming for the biannual exception of 1.9 mil, now the MLE has been used on Frye?
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
I see that you are an optimist!! :D

we were on track of 60 win season at the start of the past season. If Nash keeps his production over 40 min and 82 games, we will be in the WCF just as in 2006. :p
 

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
22,866
Reaction score
12,633
Location
Laveen, AZ
I'd take 45 wins if we make the playoffs and end up in the NBA Championships.
 

Trifecta

Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Posts
195
Reaction score
5
I didn't think it would be possible to find a weaker rebounder than Amare to replace him at PF
 

Griffin

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Posts
3,726
Reaction score
1
Location
EU
If for whatever reason Amare walks without sign-and-trade, then Warrick might be about all we can afford. But if we trade Amare and get the large TPE, we can do a lot better. So if we still only sign Warrick in that case, then it would be another cost-cutting move.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
If for whatever reason Amare walks without sign-and-trade, then Warrick might be about all we can afford. But if we trade Amare and get the large TPE, we can do a lot better. So if we still only sign Warrick in that case, then it would be another cost-cutting move.

It's not like we had better expectations.:bang:
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,541
Reaction score
9,821
Location
L.A. area
If the Frye reports are correct, the Suns have only the biannual exception to work with.
 

Tyler

Registered
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Posts
2,461
Reaction score
1
Frye guy at 5 for 30 is WAY TOO MUCH, it sounds more like what he shot in the playoffs.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,867
Reaction score
16,679
I didn't think it would be possible to find a weaker rebounder than Amare to replace him at PF

We knock Amare so often for his rebounds but it's in relation to his status as a star and a so called max player. Actually, his rebounding average puts him probably just above average for his position. There are a lot of forwards and centers that average fewer rebounds per game than he does.

Steve
 

Divide Et Impera

Registered User
Joined
Apr 7, 2003
Posts
14,395
Reaction score
2
Location
Maricopa, AZ
I had LONG wanted Warrick on this team....







....but I wanted him in trade for Marion to have Warrick as a starting 3 for us.


Now, sign Warrick for a reasonable, low risk, team-controlled term deal and I'm all for putting him as our starting PG. Hell, I don't care. Just keep our damned draft picks over the next couple years and we'll rebuild this thing right!
 

mojorizen7

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
9,165
Reaction score
472
Location
In a van...down by the river.
I had LONG wanted Warrick on this team....







....but I wanted him in trade for Marion to have Warrick as a starting 3 for us.


Now, sign Warrick for a reasonable, low risk, team-controlled term deal and I'm all for putting him as our starting PG. Hell, I don't care. Just keep our damned draft picks over the next couple years and we'll rebuild this thing right!
+1
I heard that.
 

Griffin

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Posts
3,726
Reaction score
1
Location
EU
If the Frye reports are correct, the Suns have only the biannual exception to work with.
Right, but that's only as long as we keep Amare's rights. If and when he agrees to a contract somewhere else, we should have between $5.6M to $6.4M (depending on how the Frye deal is structured) to work with, assuming all other free agents are renounced.

Btw, it's possible that Frye's contract pays a flat sum of $6M a year, but it's also possible it includes up to 8% raises. In the latter case, it would have to start at around $5.2M first year in order to get $30M in five years. Not that big of a difference, but could be useful.
 

Trifecta

Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Posts
195
Reaction score
5
We knock Amare so often for his rebounds but it's in relation to his status as a star and a so called max player. Actually, his rebounding average puts him probably just above average for his position. There are a lot of forwards and centers that average fewer rebounds per game than he does.

Steve

I know...I was just being sarcastic and cynical (just trying to fit in with the culture of this board :D).

Warrick almost makes Amare look like Moses Malone rebounding wise.
 

Irish

Registered
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Posts
2,668
Reaction score
0
Location
Arizona
I know...I was just being sarcastic and cynical (just trying to fit in with the culture of this board :D).

Warrick almost makes Amare look like Moses Malone rebounding wise.

Sarcastic AND cynical is fine, but funny is better. :)
 

SunsTzu

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Posts
4,866
Reaction score
1,674
Right, but that's only as long as we keep Amare's rights. If and when he agrees to a contract somewhere else, we should have between $5.6M to $6.4M (depending on how the Frye deal is structured) to work with, assuming all other free agents are renounced.

The Suns won't have that much. With Amare gone the Suns would have in the neighborhood of 11mil in cap. Add the min cap holds and it's about 9mil cap space. Subtract Frye's contract which will start at over 5mil and the Suns will have less the 4mil to spend and 3 roster spots to fill.
 

Griffin

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Posts
3,726
Reaction score
1
Location
EU
The Suns won't have that much. With Amare gone the Suns would have in the neighborhood of 11mil in cap. Add the min cap holds and it's about 9mil cap space. Subtract Frye's contract which will start at over 5mil and the Suns will have less the 4mil to spend and 3 roster spots to fill.
Without any of our free agents, the Suns sit at $43.1M according to HoopsHype. The salary cap is projected at $56.1M, so that's roughly $13M before the cap holds.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,541
Reaction score
9,821
Location
L.A. area
Right, but that's only as long as we keep Amare's rights. If and when he agrees to a contract somewhere else, we should have between $5.6M to $6.4M (depending on how the Frye deal is structured) to work with, assuming all other free agents are renounced.

Not according to any numbers I've seen. Where are you coming up with that?

Edit: Just saw your other post. Don't forget the minimum-contract holds, which knock off another $2 million or so.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,172
Posts
5,433,988
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top