Suns to trade Marbury, according to KDUS

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I'm not sure how it works with the rights to Milos and protection from the expansion draft. However I'm sure those draft picks are protected because the expansion draft should happen before the regular draft. Is that right?

Joe mama
 

matt_whitlock

Veteran
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Oct 28, 2003
Posts
221
Reaction score
0
Originally posted by Joe Mama
Yeah Mr. Whitlock. The Phoenix Suns "bamboozled" Marbury into signing that contract. He should be thanking the hell out of them because it was too much to pay him.

Joe mama

Why, because nobody else would pay him the exact same thing? Marbury is the second best point guard in the league, hands down. Twenty teams in this league would pay him the exact same max contract extension if given the financial opportunity. Are you trying to say that Marbury did not sign that extension with having a long career in Phoenix in mind? Because you're wrong if you are.

and you think steph is mad at being sent to nyc . . . HIS HOME? c'mon man, wake up. besides, phx was ALWAYS a free agent destination. or do you not remember the days of free agents signing here for less?

First off, Marbury grew up in New York, but it wasn't his home anymore. He learned while he was in New Jersey that the most important thing wasn't just being where you grew up. He made a home in Phoenix where he intended to end his career, or come damn close to doing that. JC gave no indication whatsoever that they were considering trading Marbury at the time or even up until about 4 PM today.

Maybe Phoenix used to be a free agent destination of choice, but those days are long gone. When was the last time somebody signed for less to come play here? Did Mcdyess do that?

why such hatred towards the colangeli? they've always tried to balance making money and putting a winner on the floor. are you a disgruntled former employee?

No, I'm a disgruntled former fan.

The Colangeli are money-hungry morons. What direction are they taking this franchise towards? Look at the last 5 years. They were enthused about Backcourt 2000, and they gave that a year and scrapped it. Then they traded Rogers and Delk and tried to go young. Then they pretend like they're "committed" to Amare, Marion, and Steph, and at the first sign of trouble they pull this sh*t.

I'm not saying I was happy with how the Suns were playing this season, but they had a good core. Even if they get Kobe, he's not going to work myricles for this team. Without Shaq, he's done nothing in LA every opportunity he's had. And is he really all that much better than Steph? Marbury's a better passer, a more willing passer, and a better shooter from the field.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,168
Reaction score
59,197
Location
SoCal
Originally posted by matt_whitlock

The Colangeli are money-hungry morons. What direction are they taking this franchise towards? Look at the last 5 years. They were enthused about Backcourt 2000, and they gave that a year and scrapped it. Then they traded Rogers and Delk and tried to go young. Then they pretend like they're "committed" to Amare, Marion, and Steph, and at the first sign of trouble they pull this sh*t.

I'm not saying I was happy with how the Suns were playing this season, but they had a good core. Even if they get Kobe, he's not going to work myricles for this team. Without Shaq, he's done nothing in LA every opportunity he's had. And is he really all that much better than Steph? Marbury's a better passer, a more willing passer, and a better shooter from the field.

right, money hungry. that's why they are constantly making trades and eating coaches' contracts. whatever.

and i can't beleive you compare marbury to kobe. you've lost any credibility you ever had right there.
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,642
Reaction score
4,742
Originally posted by matt_whitlock


The Colangeli are money-hungry morons.

Respectfully I don't think the Suns have made a profit, or at the very least much of a profit the last 5-8 years.

They know the only way the fickle fans here will give them profit is if they have a great team on the court.
 

thegrahamcrackr

Registered User
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Posts
6,168
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, Az
THe suns first game at NY is like Jan 31.

The Knicks play here on Feb. 25th, I just checked, and thank god I have tickets to that game :D
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Originally posted by elindholm
I'm visiting relatives and had to beg a laptop for this, so you'd all better appreciate my comments! :p

This organization needs to make up its mind, find a plan, and stick with it. Every other move contradicts the direction of the previous one. They deal away Robinson to save some money, then decide they need Outlaw. They deal away Outlaw to save some money, then decide they need White.

I hope you're having a good time on vacation. My fantasy team is not quite as hot, but I believe I'm still winning.

I think we can all acknowledge that the Suns have made a few bad trades that were knee-jerk reactions to early-season struggles (Robinson, Jahidi White). Actually I thought the mistake in trading Cliff Robinson was that they traded him away too soon. They could have traded him directly to Orlando and probably receive more back in return. But Colangeli has said repeatedly that the teacher that trade was the first-round draft pick they got back along with Bo Outlaw. I think right now trading Knight for Jahidi White is looking like a huge mistake.

They deal Kidd away to secure Marbury as their long-term star point guard, then sign him to a ridiculous extension when he unexpectedly leads the team to the playoffs, then dump him as soon as the team falters. They announce that Marion is part of their youthful core, then trade away the players that have helped him succeed.

I do not think they traded away Jason Kidd specifically to secure Stephon Marbury as their long-term point guard. I think they traded away Jason Kidd in order to get something of good value in return. They knew his contract would be expiring in a season. He was not making a ton of money, and he clearly was not going to re-sign with the Suns.

Signing him to do a ridiculous extension might have been a mistake, but it was the mistake that allowed them to make this trade. Bryan Colangelo has said several times today that if it were not for the extension there's no way the New York Knicks make that trade. And somebody would have given him more than the maximum season when he could have opted out of his contract.

The core is in place, the core isn't in place. They're saving money, they're trying to win now. Which is it?

You have been saying since the summer that you do not believe this core of players was going to really contend for a championship. You said they were a financial mess, muchly because of their own quick trigger with the extensions.

I figure they were willing to stick with the core, but I said Thomas and the Knicks made them an offer that was just too good to pass up.

Well, now we know for sure. This team is in for major, highly speculative rebuilding. My guess is that Marion will be traded this summer, once it becomes clear that he can't cut it as a primary option. I wouldn't get excited about either Lampe or Vujanic (?) -- Lampe couldn't earn time on the Knicks, and Vujanic may never come over to the NBA.

I'm not sure what makes the rebuilding "highly speculative". Essentially they cleared a lot of salary cap, and they have acquired a nice stock of young talent. I don't know what's really going to happen with Lampe and Vujanic, but they do have good potential.

The worst insult of all has to be the re-acquisition of McDyess. Sure, he'll probably spend most of his time on the IR and be gone at the end of the season. But still. It's as though the Suns organization is completely fixated on "what could have been" with the Kidd/McDyess core, and they've been running around like headless chickens ever since.

The Phoenix Suns did not reacquire Antonio McDyess because they are fixated on "what might have been". They reacquire him only because he has an expiring , maximum contract. That's it. Anything they get out of him is a bonus.

I was skeptical of the Suns' future, given their many huge contracts for not-quite-top talent. But at least they had talent, and at least the team wasn't going to be a long-term joke. Had Stoudemire emerged as a superstar, the Marbury/Stoudemire/Marion unit could have amounted to something. But now I fear that the pressure on Stoudemire will be too great for even his impressive heart.

What if the Phoenix Suns were convinced that last season was a bit of a fluke? What if they were convinced now that at best they were a perennial first-round exit in the competitive Western Conference? Should they have waited until Marbury was making $20 million and completely untradable to make a move? I think Amare Stoudemire wants that pressure. It did seem like you is becoming increasingly frustrated with the Marbury dominating the ball.

I was preaching patience just 24 hours ago, but I never anticipated a deal like this could be made. I still wouldn't mind getting rid of Shawn Marion's contract, but essentially the Suns have gone from a last-place team that was going to lose $20 million to a last-place team with even more young talent that is almost financially responsible. They will be able to make moves, and the hope is that they will make them cautiously and carefully.


Right now, this looks like the beginning of the end of the franchise. It will be years before the Suns are credible again. If fans weren't supporting the club before, they certainly aren't going to now.

I doubt the Phoenix Suns will be right back in the mix, but I do know that at least we aren't going to be watching a team headed nowhere (if that's what they were) that was going to become more and more unfixable.

We'll see. I think in the end when we look at what they gave up in order to get rid of Hardaway's $30 million over the next two seasons and Marbury's long-term contract, and we see what they got in return this trade will make a lot of sense. I believe we will see that it was just too good to pass up even if it was not what the franchise had planned just a few months ago.

Joe Mama
 

schutd

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
6,248
Reaction score
2,181
Location
Charleston, SC
Originally posted by hcsilla
That would be definitely the most terrible trade what I have ever seen.
That's worse than the Baker-trade was for BOS.

I will search another team if that's true.

At least NYK's pick would have to be included and Eisley's terrible contract would not.


Buh Bye! Its true and it aint a bad deal.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
Barbosa, Zarko, Lampe, Vujanic, Amare, JJ, a pick or two in the next draft- This team is loaded with "potential" but there is literaly no experience left on this team. Two "veterans" or "Veteran leaders" if you will, were traded.

I don't know, one minute trade loos terrible, the next minute it looks promising. I guess we won't know untill next year.:(
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,549
Reaction score
9,838
Location
L.A. area
Isaiah Thomas said that he hesitated to include the draft picks, but on the other hand there's no way that the draft picks will yield a Marbury-caliber player. For once, I think Thomas is right. The picks will be mid-first round at best. As far as the other young talent goes, saying that Lampe or Vujanic "might" be great is like saying that my nine-month-old nephew might be great. Sure, might. Possible, but quite unlikely.

Great players get drafted high. There are a few exceptions, but basically if you look at the good teams in the league, they are led by players taken with the top few picks. Unless the Suns convince a superstar free agent to sign -- which I consider extremely unlikely, given the franchise's obvious lack of direction -- they aren't going to have anyone at star level other than Stoudemire and arguably Marion. In my opinion, anyone who thinks that Lampe, or Vujanic, or the #17 pick in next summer's draft is at all likely to become a star is living in a fantasy world.

Joe Mama:

I'm not sure what makes the rebuilding "highly speculative". Essentially they cleared a lot of salary cap, and they have acquired a nice stock of young talent.

So far the "nice stock of young talent" looks no better than mediocre. It's one thing to rebuild around young players who have already shown something; it's another thing to gamble that a group of total unknowns are going to emerge as stars.

Bryan Colangelo has said several times today that if it were not for the extension there's no way the New York Knicks make that trade.

So they extended Marbury in order to make him more tradeable? I rather doubt that, regardless of how it turned out in this specific case.

I'm sorry, but the track record is that every other statement Bryan Colangelo makes is inaccurate, because either he's lying or he doesn't know what he's talking about. As a case in point...

What if the Phoenix Suns were convinced that last season was a bit of a fluke? What if they were convinced now that at best they were a perennial first-round exit in the competitive Western Conference?

How many times did the Colangelos proclaim that Marbury/Marion/JJohnson, and later Stoudemire, was the core of the future, destined to bring the Suns great things? A lot of times, that's how many. Did they believe it when they said it? If not, why did they say it? And if so, how could they have been so wrong? We always talk about how brilliant their judgment is -- you're telling me that they couldn't even approximately assess how good last year's team was until this year's version self-destructed?

The Colangelos are either liars, or they are incompetent. Unfortunately there is no middle ground here.
 

thegrahamcrackr

Registered User
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Posts
6,168
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Great players get drafted high. There are a few exceptions, but basically if you look at the good teams in the league, they are led by players taken with the top few picks.

There are exceptions, however there is no real precedent set yet. The NBA has just recently started drafting people overseas with the intention of bringing them over later, when they are off of contract, or ready to play. They go in the second round because few teams scouted very heavily when Vujanic was selected, plus they aren't availble right away. It is the safer version of drafting high school kids. You have a much better idea of what you will get, and you don't have to guarantee the money.


So they extended Marbury in order to make him more tradeable? I rather doubt that, regardless of how it turned out in this specific case.

Completely agree.


The Colangelos are either liars, or they are incompetent. Unfortunately there is no middle ground here.


Come on now. They are far from incompetant. As Jerry put it, he has been part of the suns for 35 years, and they own the 4th best all time record. They have a clue at least.

I personally like BC much better than Jerry. Jerry refuses to accept responsibility, and is much more hostile. He will not admit he made a mistake. Bryan is great to listen to. He is humble, but he does know what he is doing. He quite simply said, they were presented with an opportunity. The plan was the core, but when this came up, and with the current state of the team, it just had to be done.



I know you are out of town, so I dont know if you heard this. The suns shave over 113 million in guaranteed salaries. There is a 107 million dollar difference between the teams in guaranteed money. Chad Ford did some research, he said he could not find a trade that even had near a 100 million dollar difference.
 

cly2tw

Registered User
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Posts
5,832
Reaction score
0
I don't think the Colangelli are liars, they have been only excessively optimistic when publicly discussing the future outlook of the team.:D

Anyway, in hindsight, they might have extended Marbury's contract explicitly thinking that they could always dump him on the Knicks for obvious reasons. Thus, it's not really a very risky business decision. They got Marbury's loyalty and could sell tickets. Well, I'd say props to that one.
 
Last edited:

cheng

Veteran
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
183
Reaction score
0
Actually Hardaway's contract is only for 2 more years coz they would have to tank this season anyway with or without him. He should be very tradable after one more year. You don't see Marbury type of PG once every 5 years and you have to have a high pick when you do see someone like him come along.

Marbury loved the city and he apparently wanted to stay and grow with this team. Then Colangelos traded him to get rid of Hardaway's bad contract. Not really worth it if you ask me.

I am surprised that they didn't wait for A and Z to come back and see what this core can do when healthy. Then decide if they want to start over by the trading deadline. Now this team has no hope til the draft which is almost 7 months away and they sure won't have a chance at playoff for a few seasons. This team is way too young to win games even if they do get talents in the draft. And 5-7 millions of cap room money will not be nearly enough to sign a franchize player.
 

thegrahamcrackr

Registered User
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Posts
6,168
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Waiting for Amare to come back is really irrelevant.

Look at it this way.

The suns had a big 3 of Steph, Marion and Amare.

The lesser experienced, and least important of the 3 at the time is Amare.


He is injured, and the suns slide. Not a little, a huge amount.

What happens in 3 years if someone is sidelined for a few weeks again? The team will most likely falter again. Amare would become an increasingly important part. I think when the Cs realized that Marbury and Marion weren't enough to win without Amare, even for a few weeks, they were in trouble.

That means to me this team would never compete for a ring in the west. There is to much depth here. If we can fall so hard after loosing our least important of the big three, we are in trouble.


If they waited it out, it would become increasingly harder to move Marbury. His contract will reach 20 million a year soon. Now this is the Cs fault, but at least they realized it might have been a mistake, and fixed it while it was possible. They avoided the chance of hanging this franchise with 2 more max contracts, like they did a few years ago.
 

hcsilla

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Posts
3,392
Reaction score
219
Location
Budapest,Hungary
elindholm, I usually really like your thoughts, style and posts. You had some indeed valid points in your starting post in this thread.
However after the 1st shock I'm more optimistic than you.


Originally posted by elindholm
Isaiah Thomas said that he hesitated to include the draft picks, but on the other hand there's no way that the draft picks will yield a Marbury-caliber player. For once, I think Thomas is right. The picks will be mid-first round at best.
After thinking about that one more time I'm not so sure that NYK will make the play-off.
Their record is 14-22.
They definitely improved a lot with Marbury but it will take some time for Marbury to adjust remember his 1st year in PHO.
Anyway are the Knicks definitely better than TOR, PHI or BOS?
I do not think.
MIL still plays a surprisingly well team-basketball which can stay effective also in long-term ie. till the end of the season.
Also MIA is getting better so I do think that there is at least 50% chance that NYK will miss the play-off.

As far as the other young talent goes, saying that Lampe or Vujanic "might" be great is like saying that my nine-month-old nephew might be great. Sure, might. Possible, but quite unlikely.
I do think that you are underrating Vujanic.
I'm not a huge fan of him either but don't forget:

1.He was the leading scorer of Euroleague last season. OK, he played for a relatively weak Euroleague team but still he was.
2. Now he is an important and productive part of one of the best european teams.

Right now he is definitely a more vaulable player in Europe than Cabarkapa was.
Was Cabarkapa a good pick at #17?Yes, probably he was.
Is Vujanic worth more than Cabarkapa (and #17)? Yes, probably he is.

This time Chad Ford (who is usually overhyping euros) doesn't seem to be exaggerating when he says that Vujanic probably would have been a lottery pick in 2003.

Great players get drafted high.
Yes, but Suns got at least one likely lottery pick (Vujanic) and two possible others (NYK's and Lampe minus his solved buy-out issues).Furthermore their pick became an almost sure top6 pick.
Plus the huge cap relief, another future 1st and immediate 7 mil. saving (Ward's buy-out and the cash).

That could be indeed a "too good to miss"-type of deal for the Suns.
 
Last edited:

cheng

Veteran
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
183
Reaction score
0
Then why is this team so much worse than last years? I am sure everyone liked the core of this team at the end of last seaon.

They have the same players, but the chemistry is totally gone. I still think starting JJ instead of Hardaway was what triggered this whole mess. I used to think it was FJ's fault, but now it looks like he was told by Colangelos to start JJ. I am starting to have serious doubts like some others about Colangelos abilities to manage a NBA team.

They don't hire anyone outside of organization to be the head coach so they can have total control of the team. Then they tell the coach to play up tempo (meaning small ball). I am starting to agree with BC876 that this team has been told to play small by Colangelos and coached exactly the way Colangelos want the team to be coached. If the team don't get it done in one or two seasons, they fire coach and give up on their stars to repeat the process again. Small ball never gets it done, that's why they are 0-36 and still counting.
 

hcsilla

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Posts
3,392
Reaction score
219
Location
Budapest,Hungary
Originally posted by thegrahamcrackr


I personally like BC much better than Jerry. Jerry refuses to accept responsibility, and is much more hostile. He will not admit he made a mistake. Bryan is great to listen to. He is humble, but he does know what he is doing. He quite simply said, they were presented with an opportunity. The plan was the core, but when this came up, and with the current state of the team, it just had to be done.



I agree.
 

thegrahamcrackr

Registered User
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Posts
6,168
Reaction score
0
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Originally posted by cheng

They have the same players, but the chemistry is totally gone. I still think starting JJ instead of Hardaway was what triggered this whole mess. I used to think it was FJ's fault, but now it looks like he was told by Colangelos to start JJ. I am starting to have serious doubts like some others about Colangelos abilities to manage a NBA team.


Starting JJ instead of Hardaway didn't start anything. It caused some incertainty at our SG spot, but didn't cost us any games. FJs ineptitude, the loss of Amare and Z for summer work and the season were factors. Also reality hit.


I will honestly say that I think BC is in the top 33% of GMs in the league. Jerry is an a-hole, but he knows basketball. His track record proves that.
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I'm not saying the Phoenix Suns extended Stephon Marbury's contract specifically to trade him. I'm saying that they planned to keep them as part of the future, but they had to have known that if they ever needed to trade him they would have to extend him first. They had to know that there would always be one team (the New York Knicks) that would be willing to trade for Stephon Marbury.

If the New York Knicks make the playoffs they are going to be a low seed in the Eastern conference. If the regular season ended today the Philadelphia 76ers would be the eighth-seeded Eastern conference team with a record of 15-19 (44%). If it takes a 44% winning percentage to make the Eastern conference playoffs the New York Knicks will need to win at least 36 games this season. They are currently just 14-22, so they will have to go 22-20 for the rest of the way just to make the playoffs. That is entirely possible. Keep in mind Philadelphia just got Allen Iverson back, and teams like Cleveland and Miami and Orlando have been playing much better lately.

Besides, I don't think the Phoenix Suns need to get "great" players with those New York Knicks draft picks. In fact I think there's a good chance they will use those draft picks to shed more salary. The Suns own draft pick next season will be in the top 10. They do not need Lampe to turn into a great player. In fact asked for a salary goes there are probably better off if he is just a good player who can knock down some jump shots to spread the offense.

Eric, you have been questioning all season long whether the core of Marbury, Amare, and Marion is really good enough to ever compete in the Western Conference. You were vehemently opposed to Marbury's maximum extension. We've all questioned how happy people are to play with Marbury because he dominates the ball so much. You hated Hardaway's contract team over this team. So what's the problem with the trade other then it is an admittance by the team that they overrated what they had? That may be , but it sure looks like they've done a good job of getting out of a long-term commitment that wouldn't have worked.

I honestly don't think this team is going to be much worse than they were a few weeks ago. As much as I tried to stay optimistic about the return of Amare Stoudemire Zarko Cabarkapa I am much more optimistic now.

We'll see.

Joe Mama
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,549
Reaction score
9,838
Location
L.A. area
Eric, you have been questioning all season long whether the core of Marbury, Amare, and Marion is really good enough to ever compete in the Western Conference. You were vehemently opposed to Marbury's maximum extension. We've all questioned how happy people are to play with Marbury because he dominates the ball so much. You hated Hardaway's contract team over this team. So what's the problem with the trade other then it is an admittance by the team that they overrated what they had?

Basically, the problem is that the Colangelos are supposed to know more than I do. This trade reeks of panic.

When I first complained about Marbury's extension, most of this board was all over my case. I thought it was a mistake and that it committed the Suns to a fairly risky path -- mainly, hoping (a) that Stoudemire would blossom into a megastar, and (b) that the new CBA would ease luxury-tax penalties and make it possible for the Suns to take on yet more salary. I did think that things were fairly hopeless until Hardaway's contract came off the books, but I was open to the possibility that the Marbury/Stoudemire/Marion core would, in a few years, develop the way we were promised it would.

This year's team has been terrible. But if trading Marbury is the answer, why did they add White, why did they add Harvey, why did they fire Frank Johnson? Okay, so they "were wrong" and have decided that the core wasn't that promising after all. How do they know? Because of one bad, injury-depleted half-season in which the roster changed every other week? What did they expect?

On this board, we all have a tendency to overreact to individual wins and losses. The Suns win a few games and they are title contenders; they lose a few and it's time to count lottery balls. But aren't the team's executives supposed to be taking a longer-term view?

This trade is more than an admittance that the Colangelos have overrated their talent. It is an admittance that they don't know what they're doing. And that's the real problem.
 

schutd

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
6,248
Reaction score
2,181
Location
Charleston, SC
I disagree wiht that sentiment in its entirety. You seem to be assuming that the reason for the Marbury trade was SOLELY that they misjudged talent, or that they had given up on their core.

I dont think thats it at all. When weighing the promise that these three young players had vs the 115 million dollar salary dump, the extra picks, the future flexibility, it was too good to pass up.

You seem to be ignoring the business side of this deal. Or am I misunderstnading you?

Like Nicholson says in Mars Attacks! "We still have two out of three... and that aint half bad!"
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,464
Reaction score
16,991
Location
Round Rock, TX
I think, and this is just spitballing here, that Eric will be very difficult to make happy with this current Phoenix Suns team. I am supposing he wants a plan and the Colangelos to stick with it. Heck, all of us want that.

But I agree with the other guys--this deal was just too good to be true--and in hindsight, it is.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,549
Reaction score
9,838
Location
L.A. area
schutd:

You seem to be ignoring the business side of this deal. Or am I misunderstnading you?

You might be misunderstanding me. If it's a good business decision to give Marbury a maximum extension, how can it then be a good business decision to trade him for table scraps just a few months later? Either one plan is right or the other one is, but they can't both be.

Chaplin:

But I agree with the other guys--this deal was just too good to be true--and in hindsight, it is.

I must not understand what you mean by "hindsight" here. The Suns have traded arguably the league's most valuable point guard for a bunch of projects and a big cut in costs. "Hindsight" won't be available until we see what the team does with the money it saves, and how (or whether) the projects pan out. There isn't any hindsight now, because there is no new information. We know just as much now as we did two days ago.

I think, and this is just spitballing here, that Eric will be very difficult to make happy with this current Phoenix Suns team.

Well, they will be terrible. I assume we all agree on that point. But unlike the pre-trade team, which was terrible because of poor chemistry and a lack of focus, this team will be terrible because they just won't have enough good players.

I'll change my tune about this trade if

1. At least two of the four young players (Lampe, Vujanic, and the two draft picks) turn out to be quite good, by which I mean eight-man-rotation-on-an-elite-team good.

2. The Suns do something constructive with the money they've saved, which means not spending it on free agents who are overpriced, overrated, or injury-prone -- and also not using the savings to facilitate the sale of the team, which is now being widely rumored.

3. This latest rebuilding project is given a chance to work, rather than being (a) prematurely accelerated by stupidly optimistic contract extensions, and then (b) abruptly abandoned at the first sign of distress.

If all three of these things happen -- and it will be years before we know -- I will be happy. Otherwise I will consider it a huge mistake.
 

F-Dog

lurker
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Posts
3,637
Reaction score
0
Location
Tucson
I'll agree with that, Chap. From Eric's previously stated opinions, I would expect him to be the trade's biggest supporter on this board...but I also get the feeling that, if the Suns ever do win a title, Eric will be the first one to say that they got lucky and there's no way it'll ever happen again...;)

Originally posted by elindholm
Basically, the problem is that the Colangelos are supposed to know more than I do. This trade reeks of panic.

If anything, the guy panicking here is Isiah Thomas. He's the one who made a blockbuster trade within a couple of weeks of being named GM, before he had a real chance to scout his own team, much less the international and college prospects he's renounced to acquire Marbury. (Not that this trade wouldn't make sense for NY if Thomas were fully informed--their situation is much, much different from the Suns'.)


And, just because we can't see what BC's plan is, doesn't mean there isn't one. The FJ/D'Antoni transaction in particular seems to have been long-planned in hindsight, and it's possible that the coaching change is symbolic of a larger shift in team philosophy that was partially disguised by the team's unexpected success last year.




I think a panic move by the Suns would have looked a lot different--would have been less apocalyptic at first glance but more disturbing in the second and third analyses. Trading Shawn Marion for some veteran spare parts would have disturbed me much more than this trade, after the initial shock wore off at least.
 
Top