Talk to the Suns with Jerry Colangelo

sunsfn

Registered User
Joined
Oct 3, 2002
Posts
4,522
Reaction score
0
http://www.nba.com/suns/news/ktar_colangelo_040106.html

---------------------------------
Talk to the Suns


Posted: Jan. 6, 2004
Chairman Jerry Colangelo stepped up to the mic Tuesday night with KTAR’s Dave Burns for the 620 Sportsline’s weekly “Talk to the Suns” program. Colangelo discussed at length Monday’s eight-player trade with the New York Knicks and what lies ahead for his Suns.

Dave Burns: Isiah came to you, came to Bryan. Take me through the early stages of the genesis of this (trade), how it started.

Jerry Colangelo: Well, actually Bryan and Scott Layden had had quite a bit of conversation about a possible deal. What transpired is, once Isiah got the job, he was brought up to speed that there were some conversations that were going on with various teams, and he called Bryan to say that he was happy to have the job and he wanted to continue with conversations that were already started when Scott was there. That’s how the whole thing evolved.

Burns: Did things move pretty quickly after that or was this kind of on the slow burner?

Colangelo: As a matter of fact, in the world of deals I’d say it moved pretty quickly. Quite often these things get derailed or elongated and you never get to the finish line. In this particular case, that wasn’t what happened.

Burns: There are tons of questions that Suns fans, I’m sure, have on their minds, as you can clearly tell by the fact that the phone lines are going bonkers. The underlying question, why did the Phoenix Suns make this deal?

Colangelo: There are a number of reasons, Dave. Anytime you make a major change, there’s going to be a lot of opinions. I’m just going to give you kind of a preamble, if you will, to kind of set the tone.

I’ve been in the business for 37 years, and a lot of deals, as you well know. Thirty-five years with the Suns and with all of the deals that have been made, it’s resulted in the fourth-best record in the history of the NBA. So I think we have a pretty good idea about what we’re doing. That’s not being cocky, that’s just saying that this is not a knee-jerk reaction whatsoever. The reality was, in terms of who we were as a team, relative to our talent level, and the fact that we were absolutely locked with handcuffs relative to the salary cap with no room, really, to improve, other than internally. In other words, how much better your team would become with future draft picks. We had no money to do a thing because of the cap. We’re a tax payer. We’re way over the cap and we certainly getting anywhere near what we needed to get for the high-salary team that we were.


Tune in to 620 KTAR to catch each and
every Phoenix Suns game.


So, this was just as much about freeing ourselves up financially to give ourselves options going forward as anything else. The analysis about who were as a team and we wanted to do going forward. Being a .500 team or a little bit better was not really going to cut it, not in this competitive league, and we need to get to yet another level. I think the flexibility we will now have, through the draft, through the fact that we’ll have available cap space to do something in terms of free agency, gives us that kind of an opportunity. Now, time will tell, but it’s nice to know we’ve taken the shackles off and we have a chance.

Burns: Is this two steps back to take three steps forward? Are you going to go down to rock bottom to be able to build this thing back up for the Suns, in your estimation?

Colangelo: No. This team is a long way from rock bottom. If you just look at the personnel on our team if they were healthy, this is not a rock bottom kind of a situation. Amaré Stoudemire, Shawn Marion, Joe Johnson, (Leandro) Barbosa, (Zarko) Cabarkapa, those are pretty good pieces of a puzzle. Then you need role players like the Casey Jacobsens.

I feel pretty good about the fact that we have this opportunity going forward. Yeah, it’s not easy to do something that would appear to say you’re taking a step backwards. We’re taking a step backwards because we’re hurt and it’s been a screwed up kind of a season because of what happened to us this year. There was an analysis regarding our personnel and I think that’s important. Let’s analyze what we’ve got. We know what we gave up.

In terms of Antonio McDyess, we don’t know what he has left. We’re going to find that out. He’s going to have the opportunity to show us. If he can play, then we’ve got something that’s kind of special and it’s an add-on. I think (Howard) Eisley is a very serviceable point guard, a guy we’ve always liked, and a leader. We’re happy to have Eisley. (Majiec) Lampke, the center, they’re first pick this last year, is a player we had interest in in the draft and he had an outstanding summer league. He’s just young, but he’s a real prospect. We love the Serbian guard, the point guard. He’s the best point guard in Europe. The best way to describe him is he’s very similar to a Steve Nash, so we love that.

And we love the fact that we’ve got a couple of first round picks. That’s what this is all about. This past year in Cabarkapa and Barbosa, (who) was the last pick in the first round, we’ve got two outstanding young players. I think our fans got a chance to see a little something in Barbosa last night in his first start. The kid goes for 27 (points). That’s an exciting beginning for him.

So, now is the time to watch some young guys develop and put ourselves in a position to add some pieces going forward because we’re still trying to get to the promised land.

Burns: I’ve read some comparisons of this deal to back in 1988 when you dealt (Larry) Nance to Cleveland for Kevin Johnson and all the draft picks that became, really, the genesis for what you’ve got now. It was a long time ago, but that’s where it all kind of started with what you’ve got on your hands now.

Colangelo: I guess it’s fair to say there could be some comparisons. I don’t think there’s a Kevin Johnson that was acquired in terms of a young budding star, but that’s the big difference.

The other thing, Burnsie, I was thinking how people react to deals. There were a lot of adverse comments made about the deal we made with Boston sending Rodney Rogers and Tony Delk to Boston for a young kid named Joe Johnson. Today, Boston doesn’t have anything to show for that trade and we’ve got a young kid who has a chance now, without Penny (Hardaway) behind him or in front of him, to really show what he might be able to do. And the jury will be out, but he’s certainly an outstanding young player. How far he comes will be up to him.

Caller (Doc, Mesa): Mr. Colangelo, I’d like to ask you a couple of questions. Number one, I think that the best part of the trade was getting Antonio McDyess back. In my opinion, he’s a player, like (Charles) Barkley, that can see the big picture, be aware of the whole court, if he’s healthy. I wanted to ask you what his health status is and what are you doing as far as developing your young talent to get them to the next level in a faster and more efficient pace?

Colangelo: Let’s take the second part first. The best way for young players to develop is to play. When you see young players get consistent minutes over 40-50 games and are getting 20-24 minutes a game, you’ll watch that development. In Cabarkapa, who’s had two injuries this year, one was a hernia, which he couldn’t help, that kept him out the beginning of the year, then a broken wrist. I think Cabarkapa and Barbosa will make vast improvement during the course of this year and you’ll see a lot of development before next season.

The first part on McDyess. Ironically, he left us, which caused a lot of things to be put in motion a few years ago. He injured his knee against us in a game and he hasn’t been the same since, although he’s on the mend and on the way back. I think in this case, it’s more about him getting confidence in the ability to go all-out. We’re going to find out. He’s going to play the remainder of this season and we’ll find out how much he has left.

Caller (Noel, Mesa): I felt like in the past that the Suns would trade a lot of young talent for big names, like a Hardaway, and they’d be willing to trade away (Steve) Finley and (Steve) Nash to get these types of players like Jason Kidd. I felt like the Suns now did an about-face and decided to build with young talent, which I believe is the way to do it. Do you feel like this is another step where they’re trading away (Stephon) Marbury to continue to get these draft picks? As a fan, I’m concerned the Suns will get these draft picks and trade them away again.

Colangelo: Don’t be concerned about that. We only make the deals that we think are going to improve where we’re trying to go. You have to really analyze each of those deals. I guess in some cases, we’ve been a little too good for own good. We’ve tried to add a missing piece at the end at a high expensive price. And some of those things have not turned out. The best way to develop a team is through the draft and develop your own players, and that’s really what we’re trying to do. We have a very young core. Marbury is a young player, so we can’t include him as not being a young player. The reason for this trade was to give us the flexibility to really open it up and give us the opportunity, through the draft and through free agency, of young players to add to the nucleus. I think we’re being consistent.

Caller (Craig, Phoenix): You said a couple of years ago and it was assumed that with Marbury, (Shawn) Marion and Stoudemire that we were going to build this Suns team around them. Now you’re changing it, saying we need to go younger, different. Why should guys like Marion and Stoudemire believe that you’re not going to trade them?

Colangelo: I might trade anyone. The point is circumstances have changed in the last couple of years since I made that statement. That’s not going back on word, that’s what we thought was going to take place. But circumstances certainly didn’t work out quite as we thought they would, and it doesn’t just fall on any one or two players shoulders. Everyone has to shoulder a certain amount of responsibility. Our circumstances are certainly different today than they were a couple of years ago.

Burns: It brings up a question that I did want to ask you about Stephon Marbury. It was just about three months ago that you signed him to the extension. I think for a lot of people that makes the news of (Monday) a very interesting pill to swallow because three months ago, it was $100 million, he was this, he was that, and now three months later he’s a New York Knick.

Colangelo: Bear in mind, Dave, that he was going to be a free agent and by signing him to the new contract, you had an opportunity to tie up the assets so that you were in control and the player was not and that’s exactly what took place.

Burns: When you talk about this deal, you talk about the finances and the money and the salary cap. How much did this have to do with Stephon Marbury the player?

Colangelo: We have great respect for Stephon Marbury’s talent, there’s no question about that. In any major chance, it takes something to give up to get what you need to get, and that’s what this trade was all about. I think I could be, and hopefully it will be, a good deal for both teams. We wish our players who left us the best in New York. This is what we want and these are the options we were seeking and now we have to make it work, and we feel confident we can. So, we’re also pleased with the results on our end.

Caller (Mike, Gilbert): (Why) don’t you take a look at management and look inside at your son as the general manager to determine (what led to) this fiasco? A general manager makes the decision in terms of the coaching. You had to fire Frank Johnson after only a couple of seasons, that fiasco of signing Penny Hardaway, used goods. That kind of led to the fact that you had to get rid of his big contract. You guys got into this situation because of the decisions made by the general manager.

Colangelo: We must be a couple of dummies based on what Mike had to say but forget what I think. Bryan has a very strong reputation in the NBA. He’s very highly thought of. In fact, he’s an excellent general manager, and every decision that’s made is not on his shoulders. This is something we share all the way in terms of making these decisions and if I didn’t think he couldn’t do the job, he wouldn’t be there.

:)
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,495
Reaction score
9,716
Location
L.A. area
(Majiec) Lampke, the center, they’re first pick this last year

This is more "convenient" misinformation that makes things sound better than they are. Lampe was the Knicks' second pick. They took Mike Sweetney with their lottery pick.

All these subtle dishonesties start to add up, in my opinion.
 

SweetD

Next Up
Supporting Member
Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Jan 15, 2003
Posts
9,865
Reaction score
173
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Originally posted by elindholm
(Majiec) Lampke, the center, they’re first pick this last year

This is more "convenient" misinformation that makes things sound better than they are. Lampe was the Knicks' second pick. They took Mike Sweetney with their lottery pick.

All these subtle dishonesties start to add up, in my opinion.

He was the first pick in the second round for the Knicks
 

newfan101

Registered
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Posts
531
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
Originally posted by elindholm
(Majiec) Lampke, the center, they’re first pick this last year

This is more "convenient" misinformation that makes things sound better than they are. Lampe was the Knicks' second pick. They took Mike Sweetney with their lottery pick.

All these subtle dishonesties start to add up, in my opinion.

Sure ... that was ALL about spin.

Give me a break
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
Originally posted by newfan101
Sure ... that was ALL about spin.

Give me a break

I'm sure he misspoke or just forgot.

One of the reasons Lampe fell so far was that everyone was so sure New York would take him that most teams after about the 10th pick had even scouted him.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,495
Reaction score
9,716
Location
L.A. area
I'm sure he misspoke or just forgot.

Please. The guy follows the NBA for a living. He didn't forget.
 

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Originally posted by elindholm
I'm sure he misspoke or just forgot.

Please. The guy follows the NBA for a living. He didn't forget.

And who says this interview wasn't editet or something?
 

kps0001

Warriors Come Out And Plaaaay!
Joined
Aug 14, 2003
Posts
1,271
Reaction score
8
Location
PHX
Originally posted by elindholm
(Majiec) Lampke, the center, they’re first pick this last year

This is more "convenient" misinformation that makes things sound better than they are. Lampe was the Knicks' second pick. They took Mike Sweetney with their lottery pick.

All these subtle dishonesties start to add up, in my opinion.

that's lame. you are certainly reaching with that attempt to desparage JC's intelligence and ownership skills.
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Originally posted by elindholm
(Majiec) Lampke, the center, they’re first pick this last year

This is more "convenient" misinformation that makes things sound better than they are. Lampe was the Knicks' second pick. They took Mike Sweetney with their lottery pick.

All these subtle dishonesties start to add up, in my opinion.

You can't be serious. That obviously was a mistake on his part. I've seen/heard him make mistakes like this before I'm sure there was no subtle dishonesty here.

Joe Mama
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,495
Reaction score
9,716
Location
L.A. area
I've seen/heard him make mistakes like this before I'm sure there was no subtle dishonesty here.

So have I, and they have always been in the direction of making things sound better than they are. If they were just random misstatements, once in a while they would be wrong in the other direction. I'm starting to get suspicious.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,420
Reaction score
16,938
Location
Round Rock, TX
Originally posted by elindholm
I've seen/heard him make mistakes like this before I'm sure there was no subtle dishonesty here.

So have I, and they have always been in the direction of making things sound better than they are. If they were just random misstatements, once in a while they would be wrong in the other direction. I'm starting to get suspicious.

Man, are you one of those people that doesn't leave the house whenever the terrorist threat goes to Orange? :D
 

CardsFan88

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 28, 2002
Posts
7,544
Reaction score
4,526
Lampe was a 2nd rounder because of contract issues.

He has top 5 talent.

He averaged over 17 ppg in summer leagues as an 18 year old.

He's younger than Lebron, and isn't as good obviously, but for someone that young to do that AT 7 feet tall is impressive.

Now on BC, he's made a few mistakes, who doesn't.

This was obviously his first GM job... So growing pains should be expected.

But other than a few small deals that we gave up a little to much like...like bo outlaw....he hasn't done much wrong.

He cannot sign players.
He got screwed by the lockout BIG TIME
We got screwed outta kobe (that might have been when JC was still running it)
We signed Googs and Hardaway.....Hardaway it seemed would be fine, and googs was a good player (put up good numbers, but not as good as in minn....before he a)joe theismanned his knee, b) nearly died
AND Hardaway and Googs were signed/traded for why???? Because McDyess f-ed us over both in talent, draft picks, etc.

Marbury was a good trade for, and marbury was a good trade away.

BC screwed orl out of Amare.
He got a steal in barbosa for san anton pick

I'm trying to write this fast so I'm not going to go further, but their have been plenty of other good moves.

I mean when you have a great GM thats been handcuffed, and yet he still can stockpile talent, watchout.

The Suns have been about as handcuffed as say the Grizzlies over the past 7-8 years...and compare the talent. Not neccessarily moneywise....but no tax paying, no cap room, no draft picks w/o trading for

I'm obviously a cards fan...but compare the track record of any Cardinals GM or owner....then look at BC...in terms of talent, creativity,etc. He's squeezed water out of sand the last few years.

It ain't even close.

Respectfully, quit harping on BC, we could have MUCH MUCH worse, like 25-27 of the other NBA gm's. Maybe that estimate is conservative.

Isaiah might be a fool, because if this don't work he's screwed, and gets to watch the talent age and get worse year in and year out (sans marbury and houston)
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,505
Reaction score
2,326
Location
ASFN
Originally posted by Chaplin
Man, are you one of those people that doesn't leave the house whenever the terrorist threat goes to Orange? :D
Dude! milk out the nose, ALL OVER THE KEYBOARD! Damn it...
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,505
Reaction score
2,326
Location
ASFN
Originally posted by CardsFan88
Lampe was a 2nd rounder because of contract issues.

He has top 5 talent.

He averaged over 17 ppg in summer leagues as an 18 year old.

He's younger than Lebron, and isn't as good obviously, but for someone that young to do that AT 7 feet tall is impressive.

Now on BC, he's made a few mistakes, who doesn't.

This was obviously his first GM job... So growing pains should be expected.

But other than a few small deals that we gave up a little to much like...like bo outlaw....he hasn't done much wrong.

He cannot sign players.
He got screwed by the lockout BIG TIME
We got screwed outta kobe (that might have been when JC was still running it)
We signed Googs and Hardaway.....Hardaway it seemed would be fine, and googs was a good player (put up good numbers, but not as good as in minn....before he a)joe theismanned his knee, b) nearly died
AND Hardaway and Googs were signed/traded for why???? Because McDyess f-ed us over both in talent, draft picks, etc.

Marbury was a good trade for, and marbury was a good trade away.

BC screwed orl out of Amare.
He got a steal in barbosa for san anton pick

I'm trying to write this fast so I'm not going to go further, but their have been plenty of other good moves.

I mean when you have a great GM thats been handcuffed, and yet he still can stockpile talent, watchout.

The Suns have been about as handcuffed as say the Grizzlies over the past 7-8 years...and compare the talent. Not neccessarily moneywise....but no tax paying, no cap room, no draft picks w/o trading for

I'm obviously a cards fan...but compare the track record of any Cardinals GM or owner....then look at BC...in terms of talent, creativity,etc. He's squeezed water out of sand the last few years.

It ain't even close.

Respectfully, quit harping on BC, we could have MUCH MUCH worse, like 25-27 of the other NBA gm's. Maybe that estimate is conservative.

Isaiah might be a fool, because if this don't work he's screwed, and gets to watch the talent age and get worse year in and year out (sans marbury and houston)
Great post. We made mistakes with Googs(we paniced, cant blame them) and Penny(Kidd/Hardaway did "sound" good). But BC has dont alot of good things with very little to work with.

Amare
JJ
Even little things like Harvey for pretty much free! Those are the little things that build great teams.

Harvey IMO is a descent backup PF with alot of upside. Soon he is gunna be our 4th or 5th Bigman off the bench.

Our depth used to be bad, but having a guy like him as one of our worst players is a good sign of improvment IMO.
 

cardsunsfan

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 25, 2003
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
162
Location
Arizona
I honestly don't think Coangelo was trying to make the trade sound better by saying Lampe was a 1st pick. When someone mentioned they were trying to go young and get rid of older players he said that's not true Marbury was still very young. If he was all about spin I don't think he would have mentioned it. Also if he wanted to pump up Lampe he could have done it a lot better than he did.

He could say that Lampe would have been an early first round pick if it hadn't been for his contract in Europe which is the main reason he didn't get drafted so high. He could mention that the Knicks still felt highly enough of him to risk a valuable pick and we got him....

I wish some of the people who called in wouldn't have asked such obvious questions :mad: Why doesn't anybody ask something constructive like...Might you use the extra pics you have to trade away some of players that have high salaries so you can possibly go after a high profile player in the offseason like Kobe? Is that one of the reasons why you have gotten rid of salary?

Or how about if you think that Marbury can't get you to the level you want, What will you need? I can only think of a couple players who could maybe take us to the next level TMac, Duncan, Garnett, Shaq and Kobe... Kobe and TMac look like the only remote possibilties....

He probably has already figured out the last question but it would be nice to bring it up to him to see how in the hell we can when it all with his plan. That really is the only way we can I think.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

capologist

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Posts
415
Reaction score
65
Originally posted by SunCardfan
Why doesn't anybody ask something constructive like...Might you use the extra pics you have to trade away some of players that have high salaries so you can possibly go after a high profile player in the offseason like Kobe? Is that one of the reasons why you have gotten rid of salary?

You’d get an answer like, “I can’t comment on specific players, but having room under the salary cap gives us flexibility, and we’re always looking for ways to improve the team, whether it’s through free agency, trades, the draft, or whatever.”

Or how about if you think that Marbury can't get you to the level you want? What will you need? I can only think of a couple players who could make be take us to the next level TMac, Duncan, Garnett, Shaq and Kobe... Kobe and TMac look like the only remote possibilties....

“I can’t comment on specific players...”
 

cardsunsfan

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 25, 2003
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
162
Location
Arizona
You're probably right but I guess then he'll just answer questions we already have the answers to.

I guess I would like to ask him what his plan is to win a championship and if he seriously thinks there is a chance to win it without one of the marque players in this league? How is he going to answer that one? No comment? That would just sound silly...

I think Barkley is right when he says only a few players can give you a chance to win the whole thing. Maybe James will end up being good enough to be added to the list someday but other than that I just don't see another team winning it all without one of those players I mentioned...
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
Originally posted by Chaplin
Man, are you one of those people that doesn't leave the house whenever the terrorist threat goes to Orange? :D

My opinion of those dumb uniforms. :thumbup:
 

Errntknght

Registered User
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
6,342
Reaction score
319
Location
Phoenix
JC "I’ve been in the business for 37 years, and a lot of deals, as you well know. Thirty-five years with the Suns and with all of the deals that have been made, it’s resulted in the fourth-best record in the history of the NBA. So I think we have a pretty good idea about what we’re doing. That’s not being cocky..."

At heart JC is a horse trader, he loves making 'good' deals. He obviously didn't have a plan when he got Marbs and he doesn't have one now, as far as putting a team together. While the Suns do have the fourth best REGULAR SEASON record in NBA history, their record in the playoffs is not nearly as impressive. Two trips to the finals in 35 years is statistically below average and zero championships in that many years is currently the longest futility record in the league. They're also below .500 in playoff games.

IMO, Lampe is the player that's most likely to turn this into a good trade. We now need a substantial contribution from the center position on both ends of the floor and we need a high post center. Lampe is not a lock by any means but it sounds like he has a chance to be the guy. (Hope the heck D' starts giving him a little playing time very soon... )
 

capologist

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Posts
415
Reaction score
65
Originally posted by SunCardfan
I guess I would like to ask him what his plan is to win a championship and if he seriously thinks there is a chance to win it without one of the marque players in this league?

Unless you see Marbury as one of those players, I don’t know what this has to do with the trade.

I agree that you need one of those marquee players. There is hope that Amare will become that. Or, we may pick one up in the draft or through another move.

The thing is, the old plan had zero flexibility. It was basically “Amare or bust.” We were locked into difficult-to-move long term deals that would have left us very little opportunity to improve the team through trades or free agency.

Maybe James will end up being good enough to be added to the list someday but other than that I just don't see another team winning it all without one of those players I mentioned...

There’s no “maybe” about it. James will be added to that list someday.

Look: We’re not getting Duncan, Garnett, Shaq, or James. We’re probably not getting TMac or Kobe either, although that’s at least a little more realistic now than it was before the Marbury trade. We also have a better chance than before to find the next marquee player to enter the league, thanks to the New York pick and the “improvement” of our own draft position.

Originally posted by Errntknght
While the Suns do have the fourth best REGULAR SEASON record in NBA history, their record in the playoffs is not nearly as impressive.

Part of the reason for lack of playoff success, of course, is that the regular season success has limited our draft opportunities.

How did San Antonio get Tim Duncan and David Robinson? They sucked, they got the #1 picks in the 1987 and 1997 drafts, and drafted them.

How did Chicago get Michael Jordan? They sucked, they got the #3 pick in the 1984 draft, and drafted him.

How did Houston get Hakeem Olajuwon? They sucked, they got the #1 pick in the 1984 draft, and drafted him.

Indeed, we are now closer to the path these teams took to championships than we have been in a long, long time.

Two trips to the finals in 35 years is statistically below average and zero championships in that many years is currently the longest futility record in the league.

What is this supposed to mean?

We’re more futile than the Sacramento Kings, because the Rochester Royals won a championship in 1951, 17 years before we entered the league?

We’re more futile than the Atlanta Hawks, because St. Louis won a championship in 1958?

We’re more futile than the Clippers and the Cavs, because our franchise is two years older than theirs?

We’re more futile than the Bucks, because they won the coin flip for Lew Alcindor and were able to win one championship with him back in 1971?

And this is, somehow, evidence of inferior management?
 

newfan101

Registered
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Posts
531
Reaction score
0
Location
Phoenix
Originally posted by capologist

What is this supposed to mean?

We’re more futile than the Sacramento Kings, because the Rochester Royals won a championship in 1951, 17 years before we entered the league?

We’re more futile than the Atlanta Hawks, because St. Louis won a championship in 1958?

We’re more futile than the Clippers and the Cavs, because our franchise is two years older than theirs?

We’re more futile than the Bucks, because they won the coin flip for Lew Alcindor and were able to win one championship with him back in 1971?

And this is, somehow, evidence of inferior management?

Finally ... someone with a realistic view on this topic.

Something else that never gets brought up is that since the Suns entered the league 35 years ago, the Lakers have been the western conference representative in the finals ... are you ready for this ... SEVENTEEN TIMES. 17 TIMES! That's more than Boston and Chicago COMBINED. Houston comes in at second ... with a grand total of 4. Seattle and Portland are tied for third with 3 finals appearances, and the Suns are tied for 4th with Utah and San Antonio with 2. Golden State and Milwaukee (when they were in the west) have been once. The Kings, Clippers, Nuggets, Mavericks, and the newer franchises, Minnesota and Memphis, have zero appearances in that time span.

So basically, in the west, it's been the Lakers. The rest of the teams have just been fighting for playoff scraps during their down years.

When people talk about how 2 finals appearances in 35 years is so inferior to other "Teams," I just have to shake my head. The operative word is "Team." Jerry can't help it that he entered the league in the same conference as the most dominant franchise in all sports.

I wish people would consider the Lakers dominance and compare the Suns management to the rest of the teams in the west. 2 finals appearance is right in line with the rest of them. As far a management goes, we all know what Houston and San Antonio had to do to get to the finals ... get the #1 pick the year of a dominant big man not once ... but twice. That's certainly not evidence of superior management. Portland and Seattle have done very well without having the benefit of a franchise center(Bill Walton notwithstanding), but do 3 finals appearances as opposed to 2 show evidence of managerial superiority? I don't think so.

I think Jerry and co deserve a break on this subject.
 

George O'Brien

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 22, 2003
Posts
10,297
Reaction score
0
Location
Sun City
Originally posted by newfan101
[

I wish people would consider the Lakers dominance and compare the Suns management to the rest of the teams in the west. 2 finals appearance is right in line with the rest of them. As far a management goes, we all know what Houston and San Antonio had to do to get to the finals ... get the #1 pick the year of a dominant big man not once ... but twice. That's certainly not evidence of superior management. Portland and Seattle have done very well without having the benefit of a franchise center(Bill Walton notwithstanding), but do 3 finals appearances as opposed to 2 show evidence of managerial superiority? I don't think so.

I think Jerry and co deserve a break on this subject. [/B]

I agree. This beating up on the Colangelos just because they have not been as lucky in having bad years prior to franchise players coming in the draft is totally unfair.

The Lakers have an unfair advantage when recruiting people who want to make money through endorsements. Shaq could have gone anywhere for the same money. Kobe gets more endorsements that T-Mac only partly based on his performance - Kobe is in LA.
 
Top