The Walking Dead (AMC)

JS22

Say Vandelay!
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Posts
5,791
Reaction score
211
not to mention they've continually killed off major characters, including the lead, which allows for wiggle room budget wise. and again, I'm thinking Sons has standing sets and their FX budget can't even come close to rivaling Walking Dead or GOT.

Uh, spoiler alert? I had thought about watching the show. Didn't think I'd come across such a massive spoiler in a completely unrelated thread.
 

chickenhead

Registered User
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
3,109
Reaction score
77
Interesting: I don't watch Talking Dead and haven't read the comics. I did read the Entertainment Weekly recap, which seemed to think that Abraham's family was horrified because they had just seen him beat someone to death over a can of food. An easy assumption to make IMO, because even though I assumed there'd been a fight or danger of some kind based on what Abraham said to his family--but in no way did I suspect this.

There were definitely some missing blanks. I don't mind that as a strategy, and often like it in serial shows, where it sometimes means there are momentous blanks to be filled in later. I guess maybe this show is leading us to think that this will be Abraham's only flashback episode...

But also, what's not on screen that is in the comic, or is explained by actors doesn't actually mean it happened in the show--until it's explained on the show. On the one hand that happens to be a slant of literary criticism that I agree with (feel free to disagree), but also there have been enough differences from what I understand, that the source material can't be totally relied on. That also makes it fun for speculation, though.

Anyway, the storylines in the show itself are getting a bit off-pace now, but I suppose we just ride it out and things will start coming back together.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,471
Reaction score
68,714

Uh, spoiler alert? I had thought about watching the show. Didn't think I'd come across such a massive spoiler in a completely unrelated thread.

my bad... that happened a couple years ago. thought it would be common knowledge for fans of the show.
 

PDXChris

All In!
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Posts
31,422
Reaction score
28,086
Location
Nowhere
my bad... that happened a couple years ago. thought it would be common knowledge for fans of the show.

As long as you don't spoil the real ending to this final season.

Peggy wakes up next to Al and it was all a dream.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,809
Reaction score
24,016
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
not to mention they've continually killed off major characters, which allows for wiggle room budget wise. and again, I'm thinking Sons has standing sets and their FX budget can't even come close to rivaling Walking Dead or GOT.

Yeah, but they still have a giant ensemble cast of major characters just like Walking Dead, and the show's run for longer, so I assume those salaries are probably higher too. Fair point about the sets and FX budget though.

The overall point, however, has to be that the show writers MUST find a way to work around this issue without completely and utterly running over their own peenies, right? I mean, okay, so you can't put all the characters in all the episodes. Doesn't mean you have to absolutely jack everything up, write like schizophreniacs, and lose your momentum--EVERY season--right?
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,420
Reaction score
16,937
Location
Round Rock, TX
Yeah, but they still have a giant ensemble cast of major characters just like Walking Dead, and the show's run for longer, so I assume those salaries are probably higher too. Fair point about the sets and FX budget though.

The overall point, however, has to be that the show writers MUST find a way to work around this issue without completely and utterly running over their own peenies, right? I mean, okay, so you can't put all the characters in all the episodes. Doesn't mean you have to absolutely jack everything up, write like schizophreniacs, and lose your momentum--EVERY season--right?

Sons of Anarchy has a cult following, but doesn't have the audience Walking Dead does. That's just a fact. You can't treat every show as equal.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,471
Reaction score
68,714
Yeah, but they still have a giant ensemble cast of major characters just like Walking Dead, and the show's run for longer, so I assume those salaries are probably higher too. Fair point about the sets and FX budget though.

The overall point, however, has to be that the show writers MUST find a way to work around this issue without completely and utterly running over their own peenies, right? I mean, okay, so you can't put all the characters in all the episodes. Doesn't mean you have to absolutely jack everything up, write like schizophreniacs, and lose your momentum--EVERY season--right?

they probably believe their ratings say they can keep doing exactly what they've been doing. No show on network or cable gets anything CLOSE to the ratings Dead gets, so they probably figure story-telling wise, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,519
Reaction score
15,604
Location
Arizona
they probably believe their ratings say they can keep doing exactly what they've been doing. No show on network or cable gets anything CLOSE to the ratings Dead gets, so they probably figure story-telling wise, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Plus they also get those ratings with fewer episodes per season versus a standard network show to boot.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,471
Reaction score
68,714
and AMC is NOTORIOUSLY cheap. The budget battles they had with Mad Men and Breaking Bad have become something of legend in the industry. And those were the two shows the network built itself up with.
 
Last edited:

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,471
Reaction score
68,714
okay... the dangling car over the railing moment was quite possibly the single dumbest thing I've EVER seen on this show.

and that was a terrible episode.
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,316
Reaction score
11,395
Yeah, but they still have a giant ensemble cast of major characters just like Walking Dead, and the show's run for longer, so I assume those salaries are probably higher too. Fair point about the sets and FX budget though.

The overall point, however, has to be that the show writers MUST find a way to work around this issue without completely and utterly running over their own peenies, right? I mean, okay, so you can't put all the characters in all the episodes. Doesn't mean you have to absolutely jack everything up, write like schizophreniacs, and lose your momentum--EVERY season--right?

The Walking Dead writers have a big advantage over other large ensemble shows like Mad Men, GoT or Sons of Anarchy; the Walking Dead is not character driven. Basically anyone on the cast could be devoured and gone for good and the ratings would keep on rolling. People watch for the suspense, the action and gore and many of the characters are so poorly written that when they're killed off its a relief.
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
The Walking Dead writers have a big advantage over other large ensemble shows like Mad Men, GoT or Sons of Anarchy; the Walking Dead is not character driven. Basically anyone on the cast could be devoured and gone for good and the ratings would keep on rolling. People watch for the suspense, the action and gore and many of the characters are so poorly written that when they're killed off its a relief.

Hate to disagree with you but if people are watching for the gore then they're watching for the wrong reasons. The zombies are actually the McGuffin of the story(if I'm understanding the term correctly). The show is exactly character driven. It's about people in a distopian situation. As for losing characters, only 1 major character has been lost and that was Shane. All of the others who were killed off were minor characters including Lori. If Darryl were ever killed off, the ratings would take a hit.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,519
Reaction score
15,604
Location
Arizona
This is what drives me crazy about the show. These unnecessary filler episodes. Most shows simply show a quick flashback and move on letting the audience fill in the blanks. This show for some odd reason always go through these episodes where for some reason they feel like they MUST fill in the blanks and give us every single detail.

Either they think we are stupid or it's a way to save money from the more character heavy episodes or actions packed episodes. It drives me nuts either way.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,471
Reaction score
68,714
This is what drives me crazy about the show. These unnecessary filler episodes. Most shows simply show a quick flashback and move on letting the audience fill in the blanks. This show for some odd reason always go through these episodes where for some reason they feel like they MUST fill in the blanks and give us every single detail.

Either they think we are stupid or it's a way to save money from the more character heavy episodes or actions packed episodes. It drives me nuts either way.

I really feel like it's a function of budget.

What lost did so well, was that it's flashbacks almost ALWAYS informed the decision making of a character in the present day, and always tried to end with a twist. These flashbacks most of the time just fill in the blanks.
 

Town Drunk

Longest serving ASFN lurker
Joined
Aug 30, 2003
Posts
9,048
Reaction score
9,539
Location
CA
I finally caught up. Those Abraham flashbacks were absolutely terrible. Terrible editing and I had no idea what the significance of it was until I read this thread.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,519
Reaction score
15,604
Location
Arizona
I really feel like it's a function of budget.

What lost did so well, was that it's flashbacks almost ALWAYS informed the decision making of a character in the present day, and always tried to end with a twist. These flashbacks most of the time just fill in the blanks.

Right.....most of the time unnecessary.

I finally caught up. Those Abraham flashbacks were absolutely terrible. Terrible editing and I had no idea what the significance of it was until I read this thread.

Terrible.....bad editing. Not just from a story telling perspective but the jump cuts between present day and past were also horrible. The timing was bad and at times abrupt. This reminds me of my Cinema & TV Production class when we all took turns learning how to edit. It was bad.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,809
Reaction score
24,016
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
Hate to disagree with you but if people are watching for the gore then they're watching for the wrong reasons. The zombies are actually the McGuffin of the story(if I'm understanding the term correctly). The show is exactly character driven. It's about people in a distopian situation. As for losing characters, only 1 major character has been lost and that was Shane. All of the others who were killed off were minor characters including Lori. If Darryl were ever killed off, the ratings would take a hit.

If Daryl were ever killed off, the show would die.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,420
Reaction score
16,937
Location
Round Rock, TX
I liked the episode, but only because it was Carol/Daryl centric, and it confirmed my suspicions about who Daryl had with him when he returned to the church.

I'm good with anything, filler or not, of Carol and Daryl. Both are two of the strongest characters, if not THE strongest, in the entire show.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,519
Reaction score
15,604
Location
Arizona
I liked the episode, but only because it was Carol/Daryl centric, and it confirmed my suspicions about who Daryl had with him when he returned to the church.

I'm good with anything, filler or not, of Carol and Daryl. Both are two of the strongest characters, if not THE strongest, in the entire show.

Not the biggest Carol fan but I love Daryl. I don't mind a Daryl centric episode. In fact, it was the only saving grace of the episode. I just wish it hadn't been a completely unnecessary filler story.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,420
Reaction score
16,937
Location
Round Rock, TX
Not the biggest Carol fan but I love Daryl. I don't mind a Daryl centric episode. In fact, it was the only saving grace of the episode. I just wish it hadn't been a completely unnecessary filler story.

Carol has become a fan favorite, and I'm much more invested in her story, more than Beth and more than Abraham and Glenn/Maggie, that's for sure.
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
This season has hit the skids. Started off really well. The first 3 episodes were compelling. Then, screech! Boring filler. Now there's only 2 episodes left before the mid season break. Looks like we're going to deal with the completely made up hospital/slavery ring, a storyline no one gives a crap about.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,420
Reaction score
16,937
Location
Round Rock, TX
This season has hit the skids. Started off really well. The first 3 episodes were compelling. Then, screech! Boring filler. Now there's only 2 episodes left before the mid season break. Looks like we're going to deal with the completely made up hospital/slavery ring, a storyline no one gives a crap about.

Why does it have to follow the comics exactly?

They do something else, and you'll say it's another storyline no on gives a crap about. I think saving Beth (and now Carol) is a pretty viable storyline that makes sense in this world with these characters.

Now, the hospital itself and the people inside it aren't the best characters in the world, but it's built to be an obstacle that the characters we do know can overcome in a hail of blood and bullets. Nothing wrong with that.
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
Why does it have to follow the comics exactly?

They do something else, and you'll say it's another storyline no on gives a crap about. I think saving Beth (and now Carol) is a pretty viable storyline that makes sense in this world with these characters.

Now, the hospital itself and the people inside it aren't the best characters in the world, but it's built to be an obstacle that the characters we do know can overcome in a hail of blood and bullets. Nothing wrong with that.

Because there's enough compelling storylines in the comics so there's no need to create this storyline. There is even one where Beth gets abducted. Just stick to that. Also, you think that these filler episodes were entertaining? you'd be in the minority. The comics are on going so there's no running out of material. There's really no need to create antagonists when there are plenty to go around already. Hell, the better thing to do was to at least dedicate an episode to Fr. Gabriel so we can see what happened with him(maybe they will, we don't know yet) instead of showing what happened with Abraham.
 
Top