Chopper0080
2021 - Prove It
2015 - Texas A&MI think just one. Baker Mayfield's heisman winning year.
2016 - Transfer Year
2017 - Backup to Baker
2018 - Starter
2015 - Texas A&MI think just one. Baker Mayfield's heisman winning year.
2015 - Texas A&M
2016 - Transfer Year
2017 - Backup to Baker
2018 - Starter
This happened because Baker applied for, and was granted, another year of eligibility.2015 - Texas A&M
2016 - Transfer Year
2017 - Backup to Baker
2018 - Starter
I think you mean Terrance Marshall, who has been pretty terrible for the Panthers.So Smith-Njigba, Olave, and Garrett Wilson are better than Jefferson, Chase, and Edwards-Helaire? In what world?
The whole Daniels vs Burrow thing is a waste of time, Burrow was just the obvious name that popped into my head to counter "He's only had one good season".
There are a whole bunch of guys that got drafted high off one good season. Wentz, Trubisky, Mark Sanchez etc
RG3 had 3 meh seasons and one great final year.
Heck, just recently Zach Wilson went #2 based off one season with 33/3 after going 12/3 and 11/9 on TD/INT the previous 2 seasons.
There is a long history of teams drafting QB's high based off one great season, whether they had bad previous seasons or not.
In just about every world. Edward’s-Helaire is a RB.
Sure. You could throw Mulli in as the 3rd receiver along with Chase and Jefferson and they would still be the best trio.I think you mean Terrance Marshall, who has been pretty terrible for the Panthers.
Surely NFL teams will keep making the same mistake over and over like they did with these guys.
I'm going to be real cautious about taking a guy who was borderline bad for four college seasons though.The whole Daniels vs Burrow thing is a waste of time, Burrow was just the obvious name that popped into my head to counter "He's only had one good season".
There are a whole bunch of guys that got drafted high off one good season. Wentz, Trubisky, Mark Sanchez etc
RG3 had 3 meh seasons and one great final year.
Heck, just recently Zach Wilson went #2 based off one season with 33/3 after going 12/3 and 11/9 on TD/INT the previous 2 seasons.
There is a long history of teams drafting QB's high based off one great season, whether they had bad previous seasons or not.
Even with that being said Burrow was actually worse than LSU's previous QB Danny Etling (who the Patriots tried at WR)Yes Haskins beat out Burrow but it really wasn’t a fair fight. After Haskins went in and lit up Michigan the prior year, he was going to be the QB.
And you’re right, it’s not like Haskins was a scrub. He set about every big 10 passing record there was that year.
Surely NFL teams will keep making the same mistake over and over like they did with these guys.
As the cliche' goes: It only takes one...Never stopped them before
This is a bit exaggerated though right?I'm going to be real cautious about taking a guy who was borderline bad for four college seasons though.
So what about this Nabers kid we haven't talked about directly in the last 80 or so posts?
He was good...for a freshman..he had a pretty good team around him though.This is a bit exaggerated though right?
True freshman year was solid.
And was a big disappointment.He only played 4 games his SO year
Sure. Daniels was one of the reasons ASU was bad. He hasn't gotten any better, and appeared to actually be a lot worse.His JR year was bad no doubt. However, a lot of chaos at ASU
Eh. Solid. That's a great endorsement for a 4th year starter. How many 4 year starters at power five schools would you call this an endorsement? And he had talent at LSU.Solid his 1st year at LSU
His fifth year, that distinction really matters a lot. It's the same reason I'm not excited about Bo Nix, a player you mention in the next statement.One of the GOAT college football seasons his 2nd year at LSU
Why would you hold anything against anybody if they are good in the pros? That isn't a relevant statement.FWIW, I wouldnt draft Bo Nix either. However, if Bo is good in the pros is anyone really going to be holding his time at Auburn against him?
Maybe, but plenty of young QBs hit the ground running. The struggles are absolute question marks. If you had watched Daniels like a lot of us here have, you'd want no part of him.Truth is some of these guys had no business playing before their 3rd or 4th year in college anyway.
I'm going to be real cautious about taking a guy who was borderline bad for four college seasons though.
The thread got ASFN'd. Everything becomes a QB debate at some pointWhat the hell happened to this thread
How did you guys go from Nabers to Burrow’s college background to Jayden’s college background
If you throw Mulli in, no doubt. Hes uncoverable.Sure. You could throw Mulli in as the 3rd receiver along with Chase and Jefferson and they would still be the best trio.
The reason I included Edwards, is because I think he was 3rd in receiving on the year if I remember the stats correctly. Ah well.If you throw Mulli in, no doubt. Hes uncoverable.
He’s trading down and taking a guard and we’ll all be apoplectic.Man this board is going to melt down on draft day. There is literally 5 different roads Monti could go down on draft day depending on free agency, trades, other teams selections etc.
Ooh, which guard and what did Monti get in draft capital. Is it enough to trade for Joe Burrow.He’s trading down and taking a guard and we’ll all be apoplectic.
Kyler Murray tooThe whole Daniels vs Burrow thing is a waste of time, Burrow was just the obvious name that popped into my head to counter "He's only had one good season".
There are a whole bunch of guys that got drafted high off one good season. Wentz, Trubisky, Mark Sanchez etc
RG3 had 3 meh seasons and one great final year.
Heck, just recently Zach Wilson went #2 based off one season with 33/3 after going 12/3 and 11/9 on TD/INT the previous 2 seasons.
There is a long history of teams drafting QB's high based off one great season, whether they had bad previous seasons or not.
Now do every other position. Other than QB, I’m guessing the numbers are similar.If someone claims that LTs are constantly being picked in the top ten, the first thing I do is check to see how many teams have starting LTs who were drafted in the top ten.
Just checked the rosters and 7 of 32 teams have starting LTs that were drafted in the top ten of the first round.
As I've been saying for years - you can build a solid line without using a top pick for a lineman. Most teams have a mix of one or two 1st rounders (some high but mostly middle to late round) a couple from the 2nd or 3rd rounds, and then lower picks or even UDFA players.
I could see us picking an offensive lineman with a high pick this year had we not just done that last season. As I pointed out, most teams do not have multiple OL top picks, regardless of where they play on the line.
He’d disappear for a few years and then show up to keep catching 1 yard screen passes.Sure. You could throw Mulli in as the 3rd receiver along with Chase and Jefferson and they would still be the best trio.