Ok well first off my quote was in reference to this post above. In which YOU believe that having Williams out caused us to do the bolded in your post right??
Thus you think that Williams is so good that the coaches completely altered the game plan due to his absence and him being out accounted for a change in defense and being a reason that we were thrown all over during the game correct? RB's breaking into passing lanes? No controlling of gaps? No ability to contain the QB? These are direct quotes from you as to what occurred IYO due to William's being out and a change in coaching philosophy Are they not?
So no I didn't put words in your mouth YOU DID! Just because I don't agree with you isn't flaming. One day maybe you'll understand that.
I'll give you that the coaches probably didn't devise this because Williams was out-----I won't back off from the fact that this IS the defense they chose to use. It caused all the things that I said it did, AND they played straight up man in the secondary. They did allow RB's to come open unaccounted for in the secondary. They did not account for gap control along the line of scrimmage. They did not account for the mobility of the QB, AND this was planned. I assumed that they changed to this because of the absence of Williams. If this was their plan, then it even makes it worse than if they had suddenly changed to this. In any event, I stand by my statements about this plan failing.
The fact that I was probably wrong about them doing it because of Williams absence has no bearing on what they did. Also, the fact that you chose to make such a snide, one line remark, is also indicative of a personal attack on me, (because you infer that my claim was that without Williams we could not stop them from throwing the ball). That was never the case. Those are your words. AND they did come from your mouth, not mine. Please do not try to deflect your intent onto something that you gave no thought to at the time. Your obvious intent was to make me look the fool, not point out that Williams absence was the sole reason for them devising this game plan.
I still believe that had Williams been in the game, there would have been better gap control than what occurred in his absence. It was the constant pass rush by the D'line, and the constant running to account for lack of gap control by chasing down receivers out of the back field and the QB not being contained that wore out our defensive front 7. Having no help from the offense after the first series to keep the D off the field also caused much harm. More running could surely have made a difference there instead of passing like our hair was on fire.
I will say again, if you do not wish to read my posts, then put me on ignore. Do not continue to use snide one liners to say things that I did not say or intend. If you wish to disagree with me, please do so, and state why you feel that way. I will be happy to reply within reason.
In this instance, you posted this reply only five minutes after my post. It was kind of obvious that you had been waiting to do so, and that you relished the opportunity to do what you did. Right down to the eye rolling.
And, by the way, I do know the difference between flaming and genuine disagreement.
