SirStefan32
Krycek, Alex Krycek
Speaking of Harden, how good would the Thunder be with him.
They could have kept him. All they needed to do was amnesty Perkins.
Speaking of Harden, how good would the Thunder be with him.
Bledsoe should have learned some skills from CP3Dragic learned his skills from Nash. Bledsoe can learn those same skills from Dragic.
Speaking of Harden, how good would the Thunder be with him.
Bledsoe should have learned some skills from CP3
The Thunder have plenty of firepower. They lost this game because they gave up 122 points. Harden wouldn't help them on the defensive end.
They could have kept him. All they needed to do was amnesty Perkins.
They could have kept him. All they needed to do was amnesty Perkins.
As Cotton used to say. One can never have enough shooters.
I do think Harden would make the Thunder scary good beyond what Ibaka brings them. Now if the Suns could trade for a player like Ibaka, I would be jumping up and down.
I just don't know if you can get full value for three players that all need the ball in their hands. They needed to get someone that could run the court and defend the rim so their trade was pretty stupid but I can see why they moved him. They needed to trade him for someone like DeAndre Jordan.
As for Ibaka, I'm not sure he'd make us that much better unless we also traded Bledsoe. I know you've somewhat jumped off the Plumlee bandwagon but I still think he figures highly in our future. I was worried about him until the Phoenix studio crew started talking more about the injuries he was recovering from. We need to put a better stretch four next to him and Len needs to take another step forward but I like our roster and want to see what a few tweaks can do.
Agreed. I also love the fact that the two of them genuinely like each other and like to play together. Neither one of them seems interested in starting an "it's my team" war. For some reason, there are a few fans that seem determined to start that war for them though. All I know is we are a far better team because of them, both of them.
Without Ibaka, OKC would be awful defensively. God awful. Especially when adding a guy like Harden who is one of the worst defenders in the league. Sure they would score 120+ every game maybe but they will also allow as much or more.I do think Harden would make the Thunder scary good beyond what Ibaka brings them. Now if the Suns could trade for a player like Ibaka, I would be jumping up and down.
Even if OKC amnestied Perkins, they still wouldn't be under the salary cap enough to sign Harden to the max.I thought It came down to Ibaka but I'm no expert on the subject. Let me see... Harden or Perkins? Wow, if you are right, they blew a big one.
Not sure where you and Cheese are getting this perceived Bledsoe hatred from. How the hell would a fan hate the second or third best player on the team...or maybe that is the problem, because we dared to criticize his game and did not proclaim him the best player on the team....truth is, he is not. He is growing and every fan hopes he will get there.
No one ever said they dont work well together, neither have i read anyone proclaiming Dragic the Savior either. If you truly have been reading this forum before you started posting like you said you did, then surely you must have come across a ton of threads admonishing Dragic on his first run as a Suns on how he needs to grow. he is not perfect now but he is a lot matured.
Right now, he is a better player than Bledsoe, Eric may have a slight edge on the defensive end but Dragic is a more well rounded player with better on court decision making kills . Keeping both players would be awesome, but if the Suns have to give one up for a star right now...guess who that would be.
Take either of them off the roster and we became a much different team.
While that's true, my guess is that you'd find the same effect with either Green or Markieff Morris, who are probably the third- and fourth-best players on the team (in one order or the other). We just haven't had a chance to see that, since both of those players have been healthy this year.
It doesn't look to me that Dragic and Bledsoe have any magical chemistry. In fact it's very rare that any given offensive play ends up involving both of them; what is much more frequent is that one of them initiates the offense while the other one takes that possession off. But Bledsoe is, indeed, one of the top talents on a relatively untalented team, so it's only natural that having him available makes a big difference.
"I don't really care about it. I wish is was over."
-- Durant on his scoring streak.
http://www.nba.com/games/20140406/O...f:nba:gameinfo:gametracker:tacobell:livestate
Dragic needs to step it up. He hasn't been himself lately.
I certainly wouldn't have put you in the anti-Bledsoe camp and I'm not at all sure what I said that has you responding defensively on this issue.
Defensive?? i like both players and appreciate what they bring to the table, but it is the word that comes to mind whenever i see your "rebuttal" to any post that criticizes Bledsoe's play.
Your location does show CA, so you obviously seen more Bledsoe playing with the Clippers than most of us...now i cant help but wonder if your joining the board the season Bledsoe lace 'em up for the Suns is no coincidence....
Defensive?? i like both players and appreciate what they bring to the table, but it is the word that comes to mind whenever i see your "rebuttal" to any post that criticizes Bledsoe's play.
Your location does show CA, so you obviously seen more Bledsoe playing with the Clippers than most of us...now i cant help but wonder if your joining the board the season Bledsoe lace 'em up for the Suns is no coincidence....
We're really not manufacturing this idea about Bledsoe bashing.
But Bledsoe's impact is less obvious, he somehow just makes everybody else on the team appear to be less of a liability defensively.
Yes you are. The only "bashing" that takes place is saying things like Bledsoe doesn't have a position, is a below-average shooter, is extremely turnover-prone, and isn't already a top-ten guard in the league. Those claims are all either supported by factual evidence or would be broadly shared by any cross-section of people knowledgeable about the NBA. Yet for stating them, we get labeled as "haters." It's myopic, juvenile, and creates a strong deterrent to any further discussion.
Your reality doesn't match mine. Keep yours, I'll keep mine. I'm not tired of the discussion, there just seems to be no point in it. From my perspective, every time there is the slightest opening you and some others rush to the board to post a negative generalization fueled by a single moment. Obviously, from your perspective all you are doing is enlightening us poor fools.
You can't have two "realities". Eric stated FACTS. Show us how he is not a bellow average shooter, show us how he is not turnover prone, and show us how he is a PG or a SG instead of manufacturing this idea of two realities.
Every player has strengths and weaknesses (obviously, some have more strengths than weaknesses, and some strengths and weaknesses are bigger than others) and stating someone has weaknesses is not an attack, hatred, or anything of the sort.