Trade Deadline Thread

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
I could be wrong, but I think they don't own Brooklyn's pick, but just the right to swap order in the first round, which would mean they can't trade their pick because it is essentially that Brooklyn pick.
They've got tons of picks. If they want PJ they should be able to work something out.

from phone
 
OP
OP
slinslin

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Celtics want Tucker. They should be able to cough up a #1. Their first in this years draft would work.

Draft Rights to Zizic for Tucker would be perfect for us and fair for them

Not too much use for a late first round pick.

Celtics should be interested in Chandler too, they need rebounding.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
120,024
Reaction score
60,591
Draft Rights to Zizic for Tucker would be perfect for us and fair for them

Not too much use for a late first round pick.

Celtics should be interested in Chandler too, they need rebounding.

Do you know when Zizic could come over? I'd trade Tucker for him if he is not one of those players that choose to stay in Europe.
 
OP
OP
slinslin

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Saltlake Tribune claims we are interested in Favors.

Only way I would do that if all it took was some combination of Knight plus Dudley, Barbosa, Tucker, Chandler..

Favors is having a bad year, similiar to Knight. He is only playing 24mpg. Plus I don't like Favors much, he is a PF with no perimeter skills so basically he is a center. I don't think center is something we really need.
 

NashDishesDimes

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Posts
1,884
Reaction score
644
Suns should just trade the vets for far into the future 1st rounders. They cant take on any more young guys ont o the roster after this draft that all need PT. The 1st rounders can be used as a trade asset in a couple years when it is time to acquire vets of our own.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
Saltlake Tribune claims we are interested in Favors.

Only way I would do that if all it took was some combination of Knight plus Dudley, Barbosa, Tucker, Chandler..

Favors is having a bad year, similiar to Knight. He is only playing 24mpg. Plus I don't like Favors much, he is a PF with no perimeter skills so basically he is a center. I don't think center is something we really need.

Favors could be interesting at the right price. I agree he is only a fit at center, but he's a defensive presence who offers some low-post scoring and even though he is only 6-10' he seems to have the bulk to play center effectively in today's NBA.

He's only 25, but he seems to be injury-prone as of late. Bad knees can be troublesome. That said, without those issues he probably isn't on the market.

I think he is an intriguing target, but I would hope we would avoid trading draft pick(s) or any top prospects. I agree with the list of players above, but would also at least consider the idea of moving Len or Warren as part of the package.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Celtics want Tucker. They should be able to cough up a #1. Their first in this years draft would work.

No wonder we are stuck with this trash team when Mcdonough wants 1st round picks for 38 year old bench players
 
OP
OP
slinslin

slinslin

Welcome to Amareca
Joined
Jun 28, 2002
Posts
16,855
Reaction score
562
Location
Hannover - Germany
Tucker is 31 and probably attractive for every playoff team. McD is right to ask a high price for him.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,958
Reaction score
16,834
I'd offer Brandon Knight and the first Miami pick for Favors.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Tucker is 31 and probably attractive for every playoff team. McD is right to ask a high price for him.

you age in dog years playing in greek leagues

he's 38
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
No wonder we are stuck with this trash team when Mcdonough wants 1st round picks for 38 year old bench players

He is right to want a first rounder for him. BTW. This is not a trash team. It is a young team with a bright future, which is exactly what they are supposed to be in this stage of rebuilding.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
I would package Chandler, PJ and BK for expiring garbage.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
He is right to want a first rounder for him. BTW. This is not a trash team. It is a young team with a bright future, which is exactly what they are supposed to be in this stage of rebuilding.

Is it a young team with a bright future?

Bledsoes been around for 7 years. Our leader & good player, but he's not Steph or Kyrie.
Len for 4 years. He's a mid level guy. He's done growing. Stop making the excuse hes young. Hes not. At 4 years, hes a veteran.
Chriss. Good, not great. any reason to think he's going to be Kawhi Leonard? No.
Bender is 5 years away from even being Chriss.
Warren, 3 years. good player when healthy.
Booker- clearly our best player.

We arent a team full of future superstar rookies. We have Booker. Great. And what else? The rookies we do have might eventually be good players, but not superstars. We have far less building blocks than you think.

And worse yet, Mcdonoughs presence will forever hurt our future. Hes a terrible GM with no vision and no plan. That Dragic/Thomas/Lakers pick trainwreck shouldve gotten him fired.

That guy is going to milk the Booker pick like Mugatu from Zoolander. "I INVENTED THE PIANO KEY NECKTIE!". We havent won since Mcdounugh got here, and we wont win till hes gone.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
120,024
Reaction score
60,591
I'd offer Brandon Knight and the first Miami pick for Favors.

I would like to have Derrick Favors or better yet, Trey Lyles. I don't think the Jazz will be able to afford both down the line. However, I think Favors is the most likely to be traded. If Favors can play some center so much the better.

Favors contract runs through 2017-18.

I'm not sure if the Jazz would want Brandon Knight but the Suns have other pieces.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
120,024
Reaction score
60,591
I would package Chandler, PJ and BK for expiring garbage.

I think Chandler and Tucker have positive trade value but I agree with you about Knight. Besides, Tucker is an expiring contract so no need to dumb him for an expiring contract.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
I think Chandler and Knight have positive trade value but I agree with you about Knight. Besides, Tucker is an expiring contract so no need to dumb him for an expiring contract.
I'm thinking addituon by subtraction.

from phone
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
120,024
Reaction score
60,591
If I'm Boston I keep Zizic. Not buying they want Tucker anyway.

Rumors are they now want Chandler to shore up their rebounding. Nobody knows... they are just guessing.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
120,024
Reaction score
60,591
I'm thinking addituon by subtraction.

I understand.

I still think Chandler and Tucker have positive trade value. How much, I don't know.

I corrected my typo to read: "I think Chandler and Tucker have positive trade value but I agree with you about Knight."
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
Is it Thursday yet? Sick of being on pins and needles...Do something McD!!
 

Bert

Walkin' on Sunshine
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
10,139
Reaction score
3,236
Location
Arizona
I understand.

I still think Chandler and Tucker have positive trade value. How much, I don't know.

I corrected my typo to read: "I think Chandler and Tucker have positive trade value but I agree with you about Knight."

For some reason, I feel like if we really think we're young and the future is bright, there's not much downside to keeping Chandler.

On a good team, he could contribute. His contract is acceptable and he could be a good veteran presence.

So I guess, if you're McD and you're thinking of competing for the playoffs next year, why not keep Tyson?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
557,923
Posts
5,451,143
Members
6,336
Latest member
FKUCZK15
Top