MastersofCombat
Basketball Junkie
Charlotte wouldve easily swapped Big Bens contract for Emekas.
Are we really freaking out about Emeka Okafor? He's an average player on a bad team signed at $12 million per for the next five seasons. That would really be brilliant, having a quarter of the cap (or considerably more than half if we re-sign Amare) being occupied by Okafor when Carmelo, CP3, or Deron Williams enter free agency in 2012.
Since the organization is refusing to rebuild, I have no problem with their current course of action which is treading water until the 2012 FA bonanza. Sure as hell beats taking on a bunch of bad long-term contracts in a futile attempt to take on the league powers.
Charlotte wouldve easily swapped Big Bens contract for Emekas.
Charlotte wouldve easily swapped Big Bens contract for Emekas.
LOL And where did you hear that?
Maybe because everyone is saying Tyson Chandler is done.
This move was made because Chandler's contracts ends before Okafor's.
If that is the case Charlotte would have jumped at a Ben Wallace for Okafor deal. Cause they would saved even more money in the process.
And even if Charlotte is stupid enough to think Chandler has something left and actually wanted him. They should have been trading with us to get Chandler.
Kerr should have known Okafor was available and they'd be interested in obtaining Tyson Chandler for Okafor. Then we swap Wallace for Chandler and ship Chandler out to Charlotte.
But why would he do that when its now obviously clear that they only traded for Wallace so they could buy him out.
Getting Okafor would have made up for the complete idiotic trade of Shaq for junk. But nope, we are still the laughing stock of the league.
Not as many teams are slated to have free agency money in 2012, so you never know. veryone's gearing up for 2010. Players are going to go where they get paid and Phoenix is highly desirable in that aspect in 2012. They'll have a lot of cap room and play in a relatively cheap area to live with a lot of tax savings.And the question is do you see any of those Free Agents being interested in joining the Suns? Cause i sure as hell don't.
The Suns have spent a lot of money in free agency in the past including with Sarver. Hell, they just overpaid Steve Nash and Grant Hill for no particular reason. They'll spend again in 2012.Anyone that buys into us spending money either next offseason or 2012 on free agents is going to really be heart broken when Sarver and Kerr announces how we signed some 28 year old role player to a small part of our MLE. Then talk about how great of a signing this is and how this guy will be a conerstone in our rebuilding process. And how they are exploring other options to help improve the roster. Meaning more garbage bin digging.
You lost me at "contender" with Emeka Okafor. He's a 6'8 center with way too big and long of a contract and who's never been better than the third or fourth best player on some bad teams. If Okafor was valued across the league then Charlotte would've gotten more back than some washed-up damaged goods.So matter what you think about Okafor, what he brings to the table is exactly what we need to become a contender again. Hes one of the leagues best rebounders and he defends the paint.
Funny you bring up cash. Because that's exactly what we would've been paying him lots of in 2013 when he's an unathletic undersized center on the downside of his career.We could have had Okafor for just cash. That's it! We didn't need to trade Amare, Barbosa or any future draft picks. Just Ben Wallace's contract which basically makes it a Cash trade.
Maybe if it was just a year or two, but a contract through 2015 means we're stuck with a max player who doesn't play like one for a very long time. And assuming we re-up Amare that means our two highest paid players for the foreseeable future would be two severely flawed big's in a game dominated by perimeter players. Definitely not conducive to winning a title.I don't see how anyone can argue about Okafor's contract and how it would be bad for us to take on that kind of salary.
You said it - potential. Okafor has none. He is what he is and that's an above average player.Hes 26 years old for christ sake! How many centers get paid out of the azz because they show a small amount of potential?
He's been the third or fourth best player on really bad teams. How exactly has he produced?Okafor has actually produced and hes still young.
Yes, you do when that $12 million runs for five more years. Unless of course said player would get you over the hump which Okafor surely would have no chance of doing. He wins us maybe a few more games next season at most.You don't pass up on a 26 year old guy that can give you 15/11/2 a game while making about $12Mil per.
This team need several things to become a contender - youth, talent, perimeter defense, post defense, rebounding, backup PG play, and a lot of luck. Okafor accomplishes about two of those things. Smart front offices don't pay $60 million to hopefully get a five seed for a couple years.Especially when he brings exactly what we are missing to once again become a contender. And all it cost us to get him is money.
Not as many teams are slated to have free agency money in 2012, so you never know. veryone's gearing up for 2010. Players are going to go where they get paid and Phoenix is highly desirable in that aspect in 2012. They'll have a lot of cap room and play in a relatively cheap area to live with a lot of tax savings.
The Suns have spent a lot of money in free agency in the past including with Sarver. Hell, they just overpaid Steve Nash and Grant Hill for no particular reason. They'll spend again in 2012.
You lost me at "contender" with Emeka Okafor. He's a 6'8 center with way too big and long of a contract and who's never been better than the third or fourth best player on some bad teams. If Okafor was valued across the league then Charlotte would've gotten more back than some washed-up damaged goods.
Funny you bring up cash. Because that's exactly what we would've been paying him lots of in 2013 when he's an unathletic undersized center on the downside of his career.
Maybe if it was just a year or two, but a contract through 2015 means we're stuck with a max player who doesn't play like one for a very long time. And assuming we re-up Amare that means our two highest paid players for the foreseeable future would be two severely flawed big's in a game dominated by perimeter players. Definitely not conducive to winning a title.
You said it - potential. Okafor has none. He is what he is and that's an above average player.
He's been the third or fourth best player on really bad teams. How exactly has he produced?
Yes, you do when that $12 million runs for five more years. Unless of course said player would get you over the hump which Okafor surely would have no chance of doing. He wins us maybe a few more games next season at most.
This team need several things to become a contender - youth, talent, perimeter defense, post defense, rebounding, backup PG play, and a lot of luck. Okafor accomplishes about two of those things. Smart front offices don't pay $60 million to hopefully get a five seed for a couple years.
Okafor has produced 14 pts (50% shooting), 11 boards, and nearly 2 blocks, in 34 mins for his short two year career. He is also known more as a defensive player. That is production we would be thrilled with along side Amare. I cannot imagine how anyone categorizes those number as "hasn't produced."
Those are all-star numbers for a center in the nba.
BTW. He is 6-10 245.
OKafor just completed his fifth year in the NBA.Okafor has produced 14 pts (50% shooting), 11 boards, and nearly 2 blocks, in 34 mins for his short two year career. He is also known more as a defensive player. That is production we would be thrilled with along side Amare. I cannot imagine how anyone categorizes those number as "hasn't produced."
Those are all-star numbers for a center in the nba.
Measured 6'8 w/out shoes after college.He is 6-10 245.
This entire franchise is becoming a joke. How long before Robert Sarver is thought of as the new Donald Sterling, and we are the laughing stock of the league like the clippers were in the 90's.
Imagine that, a center who's specialty is rebounding,blocking shots and defense being undervalued by SUNS fans.....i'm shocked.
IMO Okafor would've helped replace what we're going to miss with Shaq gone. On the other hand i don't think Okafor fits into what the SUNS are trying to do here this upcoming season and probably beyond that either, unfortunately. Channing Frye is the perfect addition for what Nash/Gentry are running in '09 .
I'm not surprised that deals like these are slipping thru the cracks of our FO. If Sarver/Kerr are positioning the team for a big payoff in '10 or'12 why haven't they come out and even hinted to that to the fanbase? Are there any season ticket holders here who can share with the rest of us any letters/emails they might have recieved explaining what's going on and what the plan is?
Hey Chap sometimes you remind me of the mayor in Jaws.... the way you demand proof for things that can sometimes be established thru common sense. Its all good, just messin with ya, I'm sure you dress better than he did.
SUNS fans: "We coulda had Okafor!"
Chap: " Do you have a link? Sorry gentlemen."
You must be registered for see images attach
Um, he's been in the league for 5 years, not 2. And he averaged all that on a horrible Charlotte Bobcat team.
Same result right?That's not what was quoted. What was quoted was "Charlotte would have traded us Okafor for Wallace's contract!"
That is nowhere near "We coulda had Okafor".
Throwing yourself a pity party isn't going to help matters.Fine, if it makes everyone feel better, the Suns suck and are the worse team in the NBA. Have to make sure I follow the status quo.
I agree with your post but in terms of his long term contract.....centers that can defend,rebound, block shots AND get you 14 ppg don't grow on trees.....unlike big,slow goofy centers drafted outta Stanford that can't do anything well.Throwing yourself a pity party isn't going to help matters.
Fact is, Okafor would've been a nice addition for the next couple years as a role player. Unfortunately he's signed to a big contract for five more years and mediocre teams don't get better by locking themselves into such deals.
The first time I read this Suns=Clippers comment on a Suns board we had just completed the Barkley trade (outgoing). Since then, I've come across it at least a dozen times and I'm still waiting. It's never going to happen (okay, never say never, but still).
Sarver appears to have been the driving force for some pretty questionable decisions but you are not talking about a franchise that lives somewhere under the league minimum every year and that contents itself to focus solely on profits. He's tried to win it all while doing his best to keep costs at a minimum and in doing so he's failed at both but that's a huge difference from what Sterling has done, IMO.
Measured 6'8 w/out shoes after college.
Then you're underrating Sterling and the Clippers. In fact the Clippers have spent pretty generously recently, and in other situations where they tried to spend, it wasn't their fault that things didn't work out (like Elton Brand's agent suddenly making up his mind to bolt for the Sixers). It's fashionable to dump on Sterling because he hasn't won -- and I would never say he's a good owner -- but willingness to spend has not been his big problem over the last several seasons. Sterling/Dunleavy's teams have failed because, like Sarver/Kerr, their judgment is terrible. With a few more years of failure, the Suns will have just as much difficult attracting free agents as the Clippers currently do.