- Joined
- May 14, 2002
- Posts
- 88,242
- Reaction score
- 39,873
Happens all the time.
OK cite the last 3 examples where a top 10 national recruit had a school use marketing to suggest they were a finalist when they actually weren't.
Happens all the time.
OK cite the last 3 examples where a top 10 national recruit had a school use marketing to suggest they were a finalist when they actually weren't.
Lol. Really Russ? I don't get right on your 'challenge' and you post crickets after a couple hours. When I get a chance I'll do the appropriate research to satisfy to resident Dbag UCLA fan who's on half a dozen bball sites I frequent.
Research? You said it happens all the time, shouldn't be a problem to name 3 or 2 or even 1 off the top of your head.
it happens all the time with kids lying about who's recruiting them, but it doesn't happen the other way around. For one thing, it's against NCAA rules for schools to talk about kids that aren't signed commits, so a school openly marketing about a kid they're recruiting is breaking NCAA rules. And in a recruitment like this if a school did do that they'd absolutely be reported by the other schools involved. Remember Duke reported Bazz not all that long ago and his violation was taking a visit to Duke(and UNC).
I'm on exactly one Arizona site, 2 UCLA sites and this one so like the earlier made up comment that one isn't true either.
My apologies Russ. Last evening was a combination of a bad day at work and then PWI, which is not good.
What I meant in my ill advised PWI was not that UCLA was behind stirring up misinformation, but possibly some of the fan sites like Bruin Report, etc. Not saying they did in this case however. I've seen mention of this tactic regarding a number of recruitments over the past few years, but mostly conjecture. So you're right in that respect. I've got nothing. lol.
Re: UA sites. I could have sworn I've seen you trolling UA's Scout site and Goazcats.com on occasion. lol.
Anyway, again, my apologies Russ on getting carried away while PWI,
Gotcha, and not a problem. For the most part BRO was highly skeptical of the Winslow and UCLA talk up until a couple of days ago when they started reporting sources close to Winslow saying UCLA was a serious player. Even Gershon said so.
I post on the free UA scout.com board quite a bit. I've never posted on Go AZcats that I'm aware of. I post on BRO and Bruinzone and here that's about it. I occasionally post on the KU board more this year because I'm fascinated with this years KU team, love Wiggins, Selden and Embiid.
Great kid, wish he'd picked UCLA.
Very disappointed in Jessie Wildcat's response to all this, I was expecting an epic meltdown but so far it's just more talk about Duke collusion and how Millers' staff needs to respond and report to the NCAA.
Jessie went so far hounding Duke recruiting sites with nonsense about the Winslow recruitment that one of jessies several Twitter accounts got banned for spam and harassment. Jessie then started contacting Twitter threatening to sue them. I know this because I have a buddy who works at Twitter and he's a huge Duke fan so a couple of the guys there told him the story wondering if he had any idea what this nutjob Jessie was talking about. he doesn't follow recruiting closely so he asked me and I explained to him who Jessie was.
Still amazes me the Scout sites let Jessie do that stuff, they have to think it generates posts and that's all they care about. To me it's like allowing graffiti and broken windows in a neighborhood, after awhile it just shows you don't particularly care what happens.
You never know I suppose, this is the definition of a trap game with Duke looming next Friday and DU kept it close vs UCLA plus more of a "home" game for you.
But yeah, Cats by double digits.
Drexel is pretty good but they have no size, way too small to match up with UA inside. When UCLA played them they had one big named Ruffin who's about 6'8" with a Baron Davis beard, looks to be about 40 years old, and is tough as nails inside. Another big was ok and that's it. Their guards are pretty good. Massenat had 20 against us but that included 8 points in 2 minutes with Bryce Alford on him before dad figured it out and went zone when Bryce was in.
They like to spread the court and dribble drive but that won't work with UA's shot blockers. They have some guys who can get hot from 3 but against UCLA they weren't hot 5-23.
As long as Miller doesn't have a son in there trying to guard someone UA should win fairly easily.
Gotcha, and not a problem. For the most part BRO was highly skeptical of the Winslow and UCLA talk up until a couple of days ago when they started reporting sources close to Winslow saying UCLA was a serious player. Even Gershon said so.
I post on the free UA scout.com board quite a bit. I've never posted on Go AZcats that I'm aware of. I post on BRO and Bruinzone and here that's about it. I occasionally post on the KU board more this year because I'm fascinated with this years KU team, love Wiggins, Selden and Embiid.
Great kid, wish he'd picked UCLA.
Very disappointed in Jessie Wildcat's response to all this, I was expecting an epic meltdown but so far it's just more talk about Duke collusion and how Millers' staff needs to respond and report to the NCAA.
Jessie went so far hounding Duke recruiting sites with nonsense about the Winslow recruitment that one of jessies several Twitter accounts got banned for spam and harassment. Jessie then started contacting Twitter threatening to sue them. I know this because I have a buddy who works at Twitter and he's a huge Duke fan so a couple of the guys there told him the story wondering if he had any idea what this nutjob Jessie was talking about. he doesn't follow recruiting closely so he asked me and I explained to him who Jessie was.
Still amazes me the Scout sites let Jessie do that stuff, they have to think it generates posts and that's all they care about. To me it's like allowing graffiti and broken windows in a neighborhood, after awhile it just shows you don't particularly care what happens.
Nailbiter versus Drexel tonight
Good win. Arizona got lucky. Sean Miller needs to work on passing drills. So many bad passes in the 1st half. As bad as UofA played, Duke played worse.
Arizona got lucky.
Only reason the 'cats won was because all their guys got hurt or fouled out.
Good win. Arizona got lucky. Sean Miller needs to work on passing drills. So many bad passes in the 1st half. As bad as UofA played, Duke played worse.
Unfortunately my petition to have a 20 minute game didn't quite make it through in time
I definitely didn't expect the Dragons to go up 19 points - unfortunately it really hurt to have Ruffin start the 2nd half on the bench .... while they had zero post offense, the post defense was pretty good and the foul was dumb
Definitely some missed opportunities with a bittersweet outcome .... the game was there for the taking and when they flashed it at least gave hope/confidence that they can come out of the CAA .... however, some of the same old issues continue to persist
I think AZ will round into shape just fine .... should be an interesting match up against Duke
Luck has nothing to do with it, Arizona is going to make a lot teams look like they are playing in mud this year. The Cats have so much length and size and combined with Miller's physical brand of defense they're going to wear teams down throughout the year.Good win. Arizona got lucky. Sean Miller needs to work on passing drills. So many bad passes in the 1st half. As bad as UofA played, Duke played worse.