USA Today Ranks the Lineman

[kerouac9]

Bang....... We should lock the thread down with that one

You must be registered for see images attach

 

[Assface]

You must be registered for see images attach

You might want to save that one to your cpu and then upload it. Unless you just want us to use our imagination to see the pic.

 

[vinnymac]

Leanard, Leanard , Leanard...... After 5 years to have a 6' 6" 370 lbs, number two pick being recognized as "on the rise" is pathetic. With 20 lineman mentioned before you where is the pride Leanard? And I don't buy the "poor Leanard he was moved from Guard" crap. He should have been top 5 in either position for that kind of coin and given his physical gifts. Hope DG had gotten him off his arse the way a $200,000 workout bonus apparantly has never been able to.


http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2005-07-13-sw-rankings-oline_x.htm

first of all big was the number 3 pick. big in my opinion needs to get down to 340 -345 lbs to be the dominateing left tackle that everyones hopes he can be. i feel being 370 plus pounds is the reason why his footwork is so bad. their is a reason why big hasn't been to a probowl and that is because he hasn't dedicate himself to becoming the best he can be. that is all obvious.

 

[kerouac9]

You might want to save that one to your cpu and then upload it. Unless you just want us to use our imagination to see the pic.

Is shows up for me, bro.

 

[ajcardfan]

Is shows up for me, bro.

All the rest of us get is an "Image hosted by Tripod" thingy.

 

[kerouac9]

All the rest of us get is an "Image hosted by Tripod" thingy.

D'oh! Well, this is going to have to do then: