Wanted: Mobile QB.

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
This. 2012's mobile QBs are 2015's pocket passers. As people have said, guys like Drew Brees, Matt Hasselback at his peak, Aaron Rodgers, Joe Flacco, Matt Schaub when he started out, Jay Cutler, Phil Rivers, etc., etc. were never statues out there. They aren't and never were Drew Bledsoe.

Even Kevin Kolb has plus mobility and ability to throw on the run. The problem for the Cards is that Kolb can't stay healthy, and guys like Cutler and Rivers and Vick and others have had problems doing so, as well.

Soon enough it'll be difficult to find a top college passer who doesn't have plus mobility, but you're still better off keeping a guy in a predictable position in the pocket, because it takes pressure off your offensive line.

I laugh when people like Superfuzz scoff at predicitons that Vick would revolutionize the quarterback position. Look around, Fuzzy: Andrew Luck is a great runner. So is RG3. So is Cam Newton. So is Jake Locker (anyone in Nashville know what's up with Locker? I have no idea). Vick was just the prototype.

A certain Hall of Fame QB, Fran Tarkenton, would dispute who was the prototype and Steve Young in his early years was quite a runner.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,391
Reaction score
29,776
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Two of those are rookies.

And the injury risk scenarios are totally overblown. If wide receivers, running backs can stay healthy then QB who can run can also stay healthy.

Just because Vick did not and Griffin got injured means nothing. Kevin Kolb also is not prove that immobile QBs are more injury prone because they don't escape the blitz well or something.

THey're not the same, for a lot of reasons. One is that if you're paying attention QBs wear different/smaller pads because they need the flexibility to get the ball up over their heads. Also, running backs are 85% of the time a replaceable proposition. If Arian Foster goes down for three or four weeks, you have Ben Tate waiting in the wings.

Kevin Kolb has plus mobility. He's not RG3, but he's just as mobile as, say, Jeff Garcia is/was.

The problem with the read option is that the reason that it works is because you treat the quarterback as an additional runner, and that's a problem because you're increasing the chance that a defensive lineman is going to be the guy hitting your quarterback (and more frequently).

Running backs and wide receivers are more often tackled by smaller defensive backs and linebackers, and they're hit less frequently because the ball is getting spread around, and the backs are getting rotated in and out.
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
But Andrew Luck has been one of the 3 least accurate passers in the NFL and was clearly outdone by two other rookie QBs drafted below him that could pass and run.

Clearly outdone? Why did Indy go from a 2 win team to an 11 win team? I think Luck was a major factor and does not deserve to be discounted. I actually believe there isn't an NFL organization that would not take Luck over the other 2, right now.
 

Southpaw

Provocateur aka Wallyburger
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Posts
39,818
Reaction score
3,410
Location
The urban swamp
A certain Hall of Fame QB, Fran Tarkenton, would dispute who was the prototype and Steve Young in his early years was quite a runner.

Super Bowl wins

Tarkenton - 0

Marino - 0

2 qbs at opposite ends of the mobility scale. :D
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
THey're not the same, for a lot of reasons. One is that if you're paying attention QBs wear different/smaller pads because they need the flexibility to get the ball up over their heads. Also, running backs are 85% of the time a replaceable proposition. If Arian Foster goes down for three or four weeks, you have Ben Tate waiting in the wings.

Kevin Kolb has plus mobility. He's not RG3, but he's just as mobile as, say, Jeff Garcia is/was.

The problem with the read option is that the reason that it works is because you treat the quarterback as an additional runner, and that's a problem because you're increasing the chance that a defensive lineman is going to be the guy hitting your quarterback (and more frequently).

Running backs and wide receivers are more often tackled by smaller defensive backs and linebackers, and they're hit less frequently because the ball is getting spread around, and the backs are getting rotated in and out.

QBs running often get injured because their body is exposed to hits by an upright running style, it comes with constantly looking for someone to connect with in a passing motion or making the defender believe they are still going to pass. Yes, QBs get hit while just running and get injured but I think the nature of their skill mechanics influence how they run and has a part in them getting hurt by the way they take hits in my opinion.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,283
Reaction score
40,297
Location
Colorado
In the end, the QB still is going to have to make key throws in a game. The ability to run just gives those QBs more room for error. Facts are it is easier to complete passes vs. zone than man coverage and if a defense plays man coverage vs. a mobile QB, that QB can make them play.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
15,951
Reaction score
7,739
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
And in a few years when most if not all those guys have had multiple surgeries you'll wish you had a good pocket passer.

I love watching Kaepernick, Griffin, Wilson etc get out and run, it's fun to watch. But the reality is as you hear over and over, there are lots of young running QB's, there are no old running QB's. Guys who run get hit too much and wind up getting hurt.
Guys like Steve Young that can run into their 30's are very rare, and even Young ran less as he got older.

Kaepernick looks like he's made of liquid metal right now, in a few years if he doesn't learn to play in the pocket he'll be beat up too.

Agree 100% and that is what I meant when I said we'll see how it goes for a few years.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
But Andrew Luck has been one of the 3 least accurate passers in the NFL and was clearly outdone by two other rookie QBs drafted below him that could pass and run.

What is his YPC? Performing in crusnch time? Accuracy doesn't show whole picture. He took a below average roster to the playoffs. So did RGIII. But he didn't do it alone. Alfred Morris was just as big as he was this year. He didn't get as much press though. But Props to both for delivering.
Wilson inherited a little better roster. Great RB and an excellent D.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,643
Reaction score
38,899
This. 2012's mobile QBs are 2015's pocket passers. As people have said, guys like Drew Brees, Matt Hasselback at his peak, Aaron Rodgers, Joe Flacco, Matt Schaub when he started out, Jay Cutler, Phil Rivers, etc., etc. were never statues out there. They aren't and never were Drew Bledsoe.

Even Kevin Kolb has plus mobility and ability to throw on the run. The problem for the Cards is that Kolb can't stay healthy, and guys like Cutler and Rivers and Vick and others have had problems doing so, as well.

Soon enough it'll be difficult to find a top college passer who doesn't have plus mobility, but you're still better off keeping a guy in a predictable position in the pocket, because it takes pressure off your offensive line.

I laugh when people like Superfuzz scoff at predicitons that Vick would revolutionize the quarterback position. Look around, Fuzzy: Andrew Luck is a great runner. So is RG3. So is Cam Newton. So is Jake Locker (anyone in Nashville know what's up with Locker? I have no idea). Vick was just the prototype.

But none of those guys ran nearly as much as RG3 and Kaepernick did.

Wilson is a different guy, he doesn't seem to want to run although he did have almost 500 yards and ran nearly 100 times.

Kaepernick and RG3 are running as part of the base offense. I didn't see Newton enough this year to know but he had 127 runs and nearly 750 yards so I have to assume they're running him as part of the offense.

Seattle does that far less with Wilson from what I've seen, he just runs when it's wide open.

But if they continue to run that much they're going to get hurt. I agree they will either become pocket passers or get hurt. I think Wilson is already there, the other 2 are not right now they want to run.

The ideal is someone like Luck who CAN run but uses it more as decoy than anything, kind of like how Rodgers does.

But I do think the OP made the distinction mobile QB not running Qb and I was more talking about running QB's.
 
Last edited:

AsUpRoDiGy

Magnanimous
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Posts
6,756
Reaction score
4,981
Location
Phx
Andrew Luck threw the ball 627 times this year. 18 picks.
Also, compare the talent in Indianapolis: Inferior offensive line, rookie WR corps, avg run game. That would typically spell doom for any Rookie QB, especially one that's asked to throw twice as much as his counterparts. In short...Luck is a beast.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,909
Reaction score
6,818
Location
Goodyear
russell wilson is not a running QB - he is a very smart runner though

bottom line is that QBs in the NFL get hurt - the more you get hit the more likely it is that you are going to take a shot that gets you just right .... this can happen to pocket passers, this can happen to running QBs - the best QBs are the ones who know how to protect themselves, elude pressure, minimize clean shots and get rid of the ball ... those that can do that while still getting the ball to the right person at the right time rise to the top

there is a wide variety of that type of guy

here is a good sando link showing wilson passes both in and out of the pocket

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/88192/a-couple-qb-stats-to-keep-in-pocket-or-out

as you can see about 75% of his attempts have come from within the pocket and his QB rating on those attempts is 102.8

another neat note on the progression of wilson is that from week 8 through yesterday the seahawks had lost 3 games .... in those 3 losses wilson was 70 of 98 for 845 yards, 6 TDs/2 Ints with 4 sacks and a rating of 109.4 (QBR of 91.1 if you are into that thing) ....... in all 3 games seattle had the lead in the last minute

defenses will adjust, but he's shown an ability to get better .... I think luck and RGIII will get better as well .... all 3 are smart QBs who "get it"

i also think wilson style helps keep him safe .... he does a very good job getting out of bounds and getting down, he looks to avoid the big guys bringing the hammer .... he doesn't run, he flees

if you take his sack #s, plus his hurried hits and then running hits I don't think they would be much more than the average QB .... he may run the ball 5-10 times a game and get hit on 2-3 of those
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
i think matt scott can be the next russel wilson

I've been wondering why Scott hasn't received any attention from ASFN posters. 4.58 forty? That's quick for a QB. He'll be playing in the East-West Shrine game so that will be a chance to see what he's got.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
553,603
Posts
5,408,572
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top