Washington met with the FO Monday

Status
Not open for further replies.

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
5,785
Location
Scarsdale, NY
Could they/would they trade him? If so, I'm guessing for a 6th or 7th round pick, if he makes the team. And if he does and gets significant PT the pick could become a 4th or 5th round pick. What does everyone/anyone think?
 
OP
OP
BigRedRage

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
Could they/would they trade him? If so, I'm guessing for a 6th or 7th round pick, if he makes the team. And if he does and gets significant PT the pick could become a 4th or 5th round pick. What does everyone/anyone think?

Id be surprised if anyone is giving up a pick for a guy who hasnt played in 3 years. The only way that happens is if we play him a lot in preseason and he still looks really good but at that point, you dont trade him.
 

BleedRed

Registered
Joined
Jun 11, 2003
Posts
894
Reaction score
636
Location
Texas
I agree, I doubt he has any significant value at this point. I do however like that the meeting did not include anyone from his camp (lawyer, agent, etc.) Very curious what comes of this. Still have my fingers crossed he can get his poo together and be a valuable part of our team.
 
OP
OP
BigRedRage

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
I agree, I doubt he has any significant value at this point. I do however like that the meeting did not include anyone from his camp (lawyer, agent, etc.) Very curious what comes of this. Still have my fingers crossed he can get his **** together and be a valuable part of our team.

I found that interesting too that he went in by himself.
 

BurqueCardFan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Posts
1,868
Reaction score
1,912
Location
Albuquerque, NM
I've said it before but I would be very disappointed if we kept him on the roster this long and did not at least attempt to salvage some production out of him now that he is reinstated. I don't care about the financial implications. If they thought strongly enough about the offenses that occurred, then they should have dumped him years ago. The fact that they dragged this thing out this long, they should at least kick the tires. If he is even 75% of his old self, he will be better than half the LB's we have.
 
OP
OP
BigRedRage

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
I've said it before but I would be very disappointed if we kept him on the roster this long and did not at least attempt to salvage some production out of him now that he is reinstated. I don't care about the financial implications. If they thought strongly enough about the offenses that occurred, then they should have dumped him years ago. The fact that they dragged this thing out this long, they should at least kick the tires. If he is even 75% of his old self, he will be better than half the LB's we have.

I agree, to me there is no point in not letting him practice and play as a backup ILB special teamer for now and just see what he has. If we get through preseason and he is a liability or will not help us, look into trading or cutting him but for now, let the dude suit up and see what happens. It is highly unlikely he starts this year regardless, for now he would just be a slight expensive backup ILB. To have him and reddick at backup means you could rotate when needed too.
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,126
Reaction score
21,404
Location
South Bay
Could they/would they trade him? If so, I'm guessing for a 6th or 7th round pick, if he makes the team. And if he does and gets significant PT the pick could become a 4th or 5th round pick. What does everyone/anyone think?

No one is assuming his contract. He's either playing in AZ at a reduced rate or he's being cut. A trade won't happen.
 

BillsCarnage

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Posts
5,827
Reaction score
1,197
Location
The Flip Side
I agree, to me there is no point in not letting him practice and play as a backup ILB special teamer for now and just see what he has.
Remember, it's still conditional reinstatement. All he can do is go to the facility, work out and attend meetings. He can't practice, can't participate in camp, etc, at least not yet. Last I recall, the NFL mentioned week 1 of the season as being fully reinstated. The could probably be accelerated if he gets things in order.

If it is a week 1 full reinstatement, he probably won't be in game shape until close to mid season. He may not be fully back to 'normal' until 2018.
 
OP
OP
BigRedRage

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
.@AZCardinals president Michael Bidwill tells @SiriusXMNFL he expects a decision "fairly soon" on whether team will keep LB Daryl Washington
 

Brak

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Posts
2,742
Reaction score
2,770
No one is assuming his contract. He's either playing in AZ at a reduced rate or he's being cut. A trade won't happen.

Why not? The trade could be for a conditional pick, based on making the final 53 and playing time. Makes a roster, 7th round pick. Plays in 10+ games, converts to 6th rounder. Makes Pro Bowl, 3rd rounder. Etc.

My take? Depending on how far he's really come with his maturity, and how well he was able to convince team brass of that, I'd be willing to give him another chance. Yes, he's 30, but with 3 years off, has less wear on the tires than if he'd been playing, so he's effectively still in his 20's. And man did he have talent before being sat down.
 

gmabel830

It's football season!!
Joined
May 8, 2011
Posts
13,012
Reaction score
8,101
Location
Gilbert, Arizona
Why not? The trade could be for a conditional pick, based on making the final 53 and playing time. Makes a roster, 7th round pick. Plays in 10+ games, converts to 6th rounder. Makes Pro Bowl, 3rd rounder. Etc.

My take? Depending on how far he's really come with his maturity, and how well he was able to convince team brass of that, I'd be willing to give him another chance. Yes, he's 30, but with 3 years off, has less wear on the tires than if he'd been playing, so he's effectively still in his 20's. And man did he have talent before being sat down.

It's more about the contract a team would be taking on than the trade compensating they'd be giving up.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Ive said it before, I think Mike is far more likely to forgive and let Dwash come back than Keim.


I see Keim being super sour and wanting to cut him asap. In fact, Im thinking Mike is the only reason Keim hasnt cut DWash yet.
 

Mitch

Crawled Through 5 FB Fields
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Posts
13,405
Reaction score
2,982
Location
Wrentham, MA
Ive said it before, I think Mike is far more likely to forgive and let Dwash come back than Keim.


I see Keim being super sour and wanting to cut him asap. In fact, Im thinking Mike is the only reason Keim hasnt cut DWash yet.

Michael Bidwill was the one who endorsed cutting Michael Floyd. MB wants to feel a sense of remorse. If DW did not make it 100% clear that he is remorseful and that he is willing to accept a new deal that this time doesn't hold the Cardinals accountable if DW fails again, then Bidwill will cut him. Chances are that all three: MB&SK&BA will have to be on the same page. DW's willingness to show contrition by his words and his actions (reworking his deal) will have everything to do with whether he remains in the ARI or not.
 

Bodha

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Posts
5,710
Reaction score
754
Michael Bidwill was the one who endorsed cutting Michael Floyd. MB wants to feel a sense of remorse. If DW did not make it 100% clear that he is remorseful and that he is willing to accept a new deal that this time doesn't hold the Cardinals accountable if DW fails again, then Bidwill will cut him. Chances are that all three: MB&SK&BA will have to be on the same page. DW's willingness to show contrition by his words and his actions (reworking his deal) will have everything to do with whether he remains in the ARI or not.

I agree with that.

I do think Dwash will be much more appealing in his response. Obviously he had to get clean and stay clean to get unsuspended, so hes obviously cares to some degree.

And I see a huge difference with the Floyd situation. 1st of all Floyds crime was abominable. He should be rotting in prison right now. DWashs crime was that he was undependable. Broke his word and messed up with weed again.

Secondly, Floyd is an idiot. He doesnt understand why DUI is bad. That alone makes him dangerously stupid.
 

Totally_Red

Air Raid Warning!
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Posts
8,924
Reaction score
4,919
Location
Iowa
IF Dwash is willing to accept a minimum salary with incentives, I don't really see the downside to keeping him at this point.
Some upside, no downside. At worst he is not reinstated and/or can't perform and is cut anyway.
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
He owes this franchise. He needed to convince them to give him another shot and that his body is up to the rigors of an NFL season and post season.
 
OP
OP
BigRedRage

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
Urban chimed in:

http://blog.azcardinals.com/2017/05/10/bidwill-process-with-washington-decision/

more at think link, here is a blurb:
“I don’t see this as a 30-minute meeting,” Bidwill said. “There is a lot that needs to go into this and our analysis, because we haven’t seen him in three years. There is a lot more process that we are going to go through than just having a meeting. I think that everyone has to be comfortable to put him back on the field.

“We’re going to go through our process and hopefully have an answer, one way or the other, here soon.”

Bidwill said he didn’t want to get into specifics about what the team might need to hear from Washington.

“I will speak generally, we need to know that this isn’t going to happen again,” Bidwill said. “That he had accepted responsibility for what happened and what he’d done, and there were a couple different things that happen. … I just think, generally, we need to know players accept responsibility, have addressed their issues in a therapeutic way in which we know professionally they are going to be good to go moving forward and that we are going to be comfortable having them around.

“Also, when you have a player off the field for three years, that’s a big deal. … We’ve got some more process to go through.”
 

jbeecham

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
6,250
Reaction score
583
Location
Phoenix, AZ
The amount of his contract isn't bad at all... $2.9 million is a bargain if DWash is 75% of the player that he used to be. What I would want is an out-clause added to the contract to void it if he gets suspended again for substance abuse. If they're also able to reduce the amount or make it more incentive based then that's a bonus. I'd even be fine with the 4 year length if the out-clause is in place & they're satisfied that DWash has accepted responsibility for his mistakes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
556,060
Posts
5,431,321
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top