This. I say it every year.We can either find one good QB that makes his line look better than they actually are or find five or six good offensive linemen that make their QB look better.
I'll go for the former.
This. I say it every year.We can either find one good QB that makes his line look better than they actually are or find five or six good offensive linemen that make their QB look better.
I'll go for the former.
We can either find one good QB that makes a bad line look better than they actually are or find five or six good offensive linemen that make a bad QB look better.
I'll go for the former.
Yeah, those QB's are a dime-a-dozen. Should be real easy for a rook to come in and fix everything.
If you haven't seen Skelton or Kolb throw high across the middle this year then I'm not sure what games you are watching. Most of those scrubs passes are off the mark.
Fitz is already regarded in the class of all-time greats you mention. Also keep in mind one of his closest friends and mentors is Kurt Warner who left $20 million on the table so he could live a full life after retirement. Not saying it's going to happen today or next week but the guy's simply not going to stick around and continue catching passes from terrible QB's for the next seven years. You just don't understand how he's built.
OL are too. Remember drafting LJ Shelton, Anthony Clement, Leonard Davis in the first couple rounds then signing former Pro Bowler Pete Kendall? How'd that offensive line work out? Oh yeah, it sucked balls because the guys behind it were Jeff Blake and Josh McCown.
We have used two high draft picks on QB's since arriving in Arizona: well-known drunken frat boys Jake Plummer and Matt Leinart. Spend a high pick on an actual professional and there's a good chance it works out.
You really think his personality is one that he's going to hang around here for the next however many years with the current clown car that is our QB position?1. I highly doubt Fitzgerald would threaten to retire. That's not his personality.
2. I also don't think Fitz would make idle threats. Nor do I think he would hold a team hostage..
Neither Skelton or Kolb were worth a damn last year when they were getting protected, nor was Kolb in Philly. Kolb is done unless he takes a massive paycut, we can't commit to him when he has never shown he can play more than eight games a season.3. If you think you can assess the Cards QBs considering the tackle situation, you are either the greatest QB guru on the planet or you're insane.
4. I didn't like Kolb in Philly. I hated the trade when it was made. But now that he's here, I think Kolb has shown plenty this season if the Cards can merely keep him upright. I think you commit to him because (a) he's got all that guaranteed money anyway and (b) he's shown he can manage the offense and make enough plays when he's not being mauled in under 2 seconds.
Or get back Levi and upgrade the QB situation.5. The offensive line can't be fixed next year in the draft, no matter how many picks you have. Tackle is a VERY hard position to learn at this level. The best chance is through free agency or trade. I suggest trade. I suggest using draft picks in trade. Whatever it takes.
My guess is we'll probably pick somewhere between six and twelve overall but for sake of conversation let's assume everyone is still on the board at QB.
This. I say it every year.
John Skelton
Yes, you have to fix the line.This has been a pattern every year....
Whiz is on record that we will try to establish a run. Our RB's are hit in the backfield every single time they touch the ball because the interior line is abysmal at run-blocking. They struggle just to get back to the LOS. We may accumulate 40 yards rushing by the end of the 3rd quarter, and at some point, we'll be playing from behind.
So we eventually abandon the run. We have to. Everyone in the stadium knows it. Then the D pins its ears back and comes after the QB hard with their front 3-or-4. Our tackles can't handle a speed rush. The other 7-or-8 defenders drop back into coverage and blanket all the passing lanes.
Fitz is double covered. Roberts is also blanketed. #3/#4 WR and TE's will likely drop the pass, even if it hits them in the hands, but don't worry, they can't get open anyway. And to make matters worse, our RB's can't catch a screen/check-down if their lives depended on it.
QB has no open receivers. His pocket is collapsing well under 3 seconds. He's lucky if he has a lane to break off a scramble to avoid the sack.
How is a QB supposed to make this situation better, exactly?
I am sure someone will say "Warner did it!" Yeah, well he also had better weapons and is a HOF'er. Anything short of a HOF QB, and we repeat this cycle. Or we can go out and get an 4-of-5 pieces for average OL for about the same price (excluding a LT).
Ok, we'll do it your way and hypothetically be stacked everywhere on the field except QB where we continue to be mediocre or worse. Then watch us lose in the division game every year at best because maybe once or twice in NFL history have mediocre QB's won a Super Bowl.I am sure someone will say "Warner did it!" Yeah, well he also had better weapons and is a HOF'er. Anything short of a HOF QB, and we repeat this cycle. Or we can go out and get an 4-of-5 pieces for average OL for about the same price (excluding a LT). Then we get a real ground game going and take the pressure off the QB.
Yes, you have to fix the line.
A better QB could have won both the STL and the BUF game. Kolb missed open receivers and single coverage on Fitz (pre-snap read) SEVERAL times.
If I can look at the TV and see single coverage on Fitz, then I see Fitz throw his hands up in the air, I am pretty confident in not blaming the OL on those particular plays. Kolb can feel free not to stare down a receiver pre-snap.To be fair, it is hard to see the field looking out of his earhole.
I wouldn't waste a 1st or 2nd round pick on an OLman, so I guess if a "sure fire" QB is available to us, we should grab him. But only if we see him as the caliber of someone who can start for us immediately. No projects (like Floyd) with a high draft pick.....You want guys who can make an impact immediately.
With our starting OLmen back next year, and after how young OLmen have had the rest of the year to learn and improve, we should be set with depth at the OL positions.
Now, what if a sure fire starting QB is not available to us with our 1st pick? I would probably continue to improve our defense since that is what is keeping us in and winning us games. I would love to see us having the top D in the league.
Back to QB position. Why the heck do we keep drafting and signing QBs if we don't see them as our future franchise QB? We have 3 of them now. How many more can we use? These mediocre late round picks are wasting roster spots. Package our picks and move up and get the future QB once and for all, or build up the other prime positions on your team. I am sick of the QB roulette game the Cards always play.
How about simply making a trade for Cousins? Would he be as sure of a thing as anything we could do with a mid-1st round pick?
Offensive line, to be serious for a moment...... bite the bullet and grab the best FAs available immediately when season is over and you can. Don't wait for other team's to snatch up all the best ones. Build you line with proven vets no matter what the cost. My God, we wasted 20 some million on Kolb. Spend that on a proven OLman or two or three or four.
John Skelton
Ok, we'll do it your way and hypothetically be stacked everywhere on the field except QB where we continue to be mediocre or worse. Then watch us lose in the division game every year at best because maybe once or twice in NFL history have mediocre QB's won a Super Bowl.
Crispy, I love you, man, but I am a little baffled by this. Warner had one heck of a post-season in 2008 and was a toe from winning. Smith was not. Not sure what you mean.Well we had one of the best to ever play in our SB run and he still couldn't get the job done behind a line that was better than what we're putting out there now. In fact, he accomplished just a little more than Alex Smith did last year.
We need more pieces than a QB to win a SB. We aren't just one guy away. Even the good ones need more that 2.07 seconds to throw. And they need the support of a run game, at least a little bit.
Until the line is addressed, no one will succeed back there. As a realist, I don't think we can expect to snatch up proven vets to fix the issue. We need two tackles, and I don't see other teams a) letting us trade for one or b) letting their good ones hit FA.
Too many teams are having OL problems this year and the market in the offseason for those proven veterans that do slip through will be a really competitive.
Crispy, I love you, man, but I am a little baffled by this. Warner had one heck of a post-season in 2008 and was a toe from winning. Smith was not. Not sure what you mean.
My guess is we'll probably pick somewhere between six and twelve overall but for sake of conversation let's assume everyone is still on the board at QB.
My guess is we'll probably pick somewhere between six and twelve overall but for sake of conversation let's assume everyone is still on the board at QB.