This guy is going to run as far away from Phoenix as he can as soon as he has the chance.
Butterfingers
This guy is going to run as far away from Phoenix as he can as soon as he has the chance.
Totally disagree.
In the NFL you have to commit to one or the other. The teams that run successfully are committed to the run. The same for the passing teams. You just don't have the money to do both.
Like you I thought the Cards had finally forced teams to back off because of our passing game last season. But now I know it was because they played some really weak run defenses the last half of the season and actually committed to the run in some games. For instance they ran the ball 30 times vs Chicago and 62 times in the two games against St.Louis.
The measuring stick for a RB is essentially YPC. Like it or not. It is what it is.
Yes, but when you're completely futile at one thing it puts pressure on what you're good at. We could run the ball effectively this season if only DA could beat defenses stacked to stop the run.
And we're suddenly playing great run defenses this year? Bull crap. That's just not true. The difference is that teams don't have to worry about Kurt Warner anymore.
This post made me ,Too sad.
#10 pick in the first round in 2006 on a QB
#5 pick in the first round in 2007 on an OT
#30 pick in the first round in 2009 on a RB
And here we are still playing with Josh McCown, Leonard Davis, and Marcel Shipp.
OK sorry I didn't mean to insult Josh.
That's bullcrap. The difference is that the offensive line is completely different from last year and absolutely sucks.
It won't happen but...It is a fan based myth that if you can't pass you can't run.
It won't happen but...
I would like to test that theory! I would like to see the Cardinals commit to running the ball, period. We all know that their passing game is pure crap, right.
I think part of the Cardinals problems running the ball stem from the fact that they are running out of passing formations most of the time. Given that, of course they can't block 7 or 8 in the box.
So, start Skelton, and go with a lot of JUMBO formations; two RB's in the backfield, and two TE's; occasionally mixing it up with two or three wide-out formations. Tell the team, we will be successful running the ball and we are going to do it until we are successful.
Of course, this would open things up downfield and Skelton could PA and hit Fitz and Breaston with his long range arm...
Time to shake things up!
It won't happen but...
I would like to test that theory! I would like to see the Cardinals commit to running the ball, period. We all know that their passing game is pure crap, right.
I think part of the Cardinals problems running the ball stem from the fact that they are running out of passing formations most of the time. Given that, of course they can't block 7 or 8 in the box.
So, start Skelton, and go with a lot of JUMBO formations; two RB's in the backfield, and two TE's; occasionally mixing it up with two or three wide-out formations. Tell the team, we will be successful running the ball and we are going to do it until we are successful.
Of course, this would open things up downfield and Skelton could PA and hit Fitz and Breaston with his long range arm...
Time to shake things up!
It won't happen but...
I would like to test that theory! I would like to see the Cardinals commit to running the ball, period. We all know that their passing game is pure crap, right.
I think part of the Cardinals problems running the ball stem from the fact that they are running out of passing formations most of the time. Given that, of course they can't block 7 or 8 in the box.
So, start Skelton, and go with a lot of JUMBO formations; two RB's in the backfield, and two TE's; occasionally mixing it up with two or three wide-out formations. Tell the team, we will be successful running the ball and we are going to do it until we are successful.
Of course, this would open things up downfield and Skelton could PA and hit Fitz and Breaston with his long range arm...
Time to shake things up!
Hightower had 8 runs today that went for one yard or less. Eight! Beanie's shortest run was four yards on his way to 8 ypc. I don't think performance was the issue this week.
Yea on about 6 of those 8 he was engulfed behind the LOS. Not really indicative of the RB. Alo way to look at the whole picture as most typical Beanie jockers. Lets disregard the 3 carries over 20.
And that would be ignoring the larger sample size like, I don't know, the rest of the season where THT has a significantly better ypc (4.6 to Beanie's pitiful 3.4).
Beanie needs to get the ball more. THT needs to get the ball more. LSH needs to get the ball more. We just need to run the ball more period.
Quit running the same offense as when Kurt was here. RUN THE ****ING BALL
I disagree. The offensive line was equally horrible, we just had Kurt Warner and his uncanny ability (even among elite QBs) to stand in the pocket and take a hit while delivering an accurate throw. He made the offensive line look better than it was.
Faneca is no worse than Wells was last year (and an upgrade as a run blocker) and Levi Brown isn't a big drop off from Mike Gandy/Bridges last year.
Warner was just that important.
we just had Kurt Warner and his uncanny ability (even among elite QBs) to stand in the pocket and take a hit while delivering an accurate throw.
I know you're talking to Shane here, but did you even watch the game?
On nearly all those aforementioned carries, THT had no chance of getting anything. It's more indicative of the way teams are playing us: Stop the run, force DA to beat you with the pass. Or you could call it stopping the run on the way to QB.
I don't know about that. On a lot of those negative runs, THT could've gotten either back to the LOS or a couple of positive yards but his feet just fell out from under him. It was ugly; he was falling over without being touched.
It's weird that Beanie is being written off as some scrub when he's gotten 17 carries the last 4 weeks. And people are going to complain about sample size?
I just don't see it. Beanie < THT point blank. If you had asked me that up until the past 4-5 games I would've said Beanie hands down, but Beanie just doesn't have "it".
THT at least looks like he plays harder and is better at the coachable skills of being a RB.
I dig Beanie more than Hightower, I respect them both. Beanie was hurt, complained, and now Whiz is over it. I am starting to believe that its all coming down to the coach that I called my man.I don't know about that. On a lot of those negative runs, THT could've gotten either back to the LOS or a couple of positive yards but his feet just fell out from under him. It was ugly; he was falling over without being touched.
It's weird that Beanie is being written off as some scrub when he's gotten 17 carries the last 4 weeks. And people are going to complain about sample size?
I dig Beanie more than Hightower, I respect them both. Beanie was hurt, complained, and now Whiz is over it. I am starting to believe that its all coming down to the coach that I called my man.
I saw no progress at all, no plays designed to suit our short comings, no adjustments after half time, no accountability for no pressure on their QB. Really at a loss of words as far as positivity goes.
I spelled adjustments didn't I?You were to drunk to recognize if there were any adjustments anyway.
I spelled adjustments didn't I?
6, a number we had before half time, and made no "adjustments", does that count homie?Thats 6 hours post game. Doesn't count.