Why I would trade Boldin........

CaptTurbo

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 5, 2003
Posts
16,782
Reaction score
5
Location
Pennsylvania
Id trade fitz before boldin. :shrug:

Does fitz even have a yard after the catch? Kinda like a faster version of Jones.
 

chickenhead

Registered User
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
3,109
Reaction score
77
I think we would be hard pressed to get an equal return for Boldin, so that sort of nixes the idea in my mind.

More importantly, Fitzgerald has played only 11 NFL games. Boldin has played only 21. We don't know exactly *what* each of them is yet. It's far too early to call them duplicates.
 

pete

All Star
Joined
May 27, 2003
Posts
820
Reaction score
0
Location
91st & glendale. 2006!
No way do you trade a player like Boldin unless you absolutely have to. Green knows he needs multiple WRs in this offense. Good ones too, like Moss and Carter. He has two of those right now and the Cards are just going to have to shift some of the $$s they have tied up in the O line to keep Boldin. The WR position will be sucking up a lot of cap, but that is what you would expect in order to have the talent necessary for Green's offense.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
I haven't read through the entire thread, so forgive me if these points have been brought up.

#1: I completely disagree that Fitz has “more upside” than Boldin at the position. What leads you to believe this? Boldin makes YAC. Fitz hasn’t shown an ability to do that.



#2: He IS every bit as good as Fitz. In fact, he’s better. Pay him.



#3: Why?



#4: Yeah, that’s true, but why can’t we have more than 1 great WR on the team—even if one isn’t “Green’s guy?”



#5: I don’t think he has that kind of value yet. If he continues to play at a high-level the rest of the season and into the first part of next, maybe he will. The injury really dealt a blow to his trade value this year. (but all that is irrelevant—he shouldn’t be traded).



#6: And you’re the only one with this insight? See #5—why would he have the trade value you claim if this is the case?



#8: This is something that should have been dealt with in last year’s draft. We wouldn’t be talking about trading Boldin if we hadn’t taken fitz. Green wants good WRs in his offense and knew that he’s have 2 of them with boldin and fitz. IMO, they’re both in his long-term plans.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,136
Reaction score
39,717
CardinalLaw said:
Well he has only been in 3 or 4 games, but the Q has gotten 280 yards. Fitz has 570 in 11, so hes catching up pretty fast. I think Q will be alright just because he hasn't had a 200 yard 2 t.d. game people seams down on him. We have like 28 million in cap room why we don't have money for both is beyond me. I predict a 100+ yard game from the Q this week just you watch!


5 games for Q, doesn't seem like it because of the Buffalo and Giant games with 200 yards passing combined.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,136
Reaction score
39,717
blindseyed said:
I met Quan and Fitz at the Suns game last night, they were all buddy buddy, they looked like they went to the game together. Fitz was awesome, Q seemed alittle into himself but who knows. I don't think there is any "competition" between the 2

That's the kind of stuff we need to hear, that they're friends.
 

abomb

Registered User
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2003
Posts
21,836
Reaction score
1
Although I am a fan of Q, the question has to be asked; What happens when Rosenhaus convices him to hold out this summer or next?

A-Bomb
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,136
Reaction score
39,717
abomb said:
Although I am a fan of Q, the question has to be asked; What happens when Rosenhaus convices him to hold out this summer or next?

A-Bomb


HOpefully the Cards realize why he hired Rosenhaus, step up in negotiations, and get him signed before that ever becomes an issue.
 

blindseyed

I'm saying you ARE stuck in Wichita
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Posts
8,061
Reaction score
5,862
Location
Verrado
Toro said:
Were you in the Platnium Club?
No I met them outside after but they were hanging with 2 other dude the whole night, I don't know if they were Cards too
 

Mr. Boldin

Mel Kiper's Daddy
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Posts
1,634
Reaction score
284
Tangodnzr said:
In reviewing Sunday's game (only 1st half and last 3 min so far) I see that often the route patterns are to send the split end more often to the side lines and the slot either hitches, runs a deeper route more in the area of the hashmarks, or crosses the middle.

I would think Fitz is the better for running the sideline routes where he can elevate up and get those sideline tosses over the defending CB.

Yes he can go over the middle, but there, I think I would normally give the nod to Quan.

I think they either need to mix up the patterns a little more or actually switch who is the slot receiver.

I agree, I should have made my point more clear. I think Johnson and Fitzgerald should be the ends, while Boldin operates out of the slot. Boldin runs pretty good routes, but his size and strength is crossing patterns. I would love to see Boldin be what TO was in SF. Always in motion across the formation, then running back over the middle or option routes.
 

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
swd1974 said:
Id trade fitz before boldin. :shrug:

Does fitz even have a yard after the catch? Kinda like a faster version of Jones.

We are receiver heavy and lack a QB or a RB. This cries for a trade if a fair one can be found. I would not care what receiver we traded as without a running game and QB none of our receivers will help this team reach .500

We needed a RB and QB last year and need the same this year. Until we resolve this problem we are doomed to be mediocre at best. I watch the Cards to see them win not to watch any wide receiver no matter who he is.
 

CaptTurbo

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 5, 2003
Posts
16,782
Reaction score
5
Location
Pennsylvania
Trade BJ.

We will get Lamont jordan anyway I feel it. Is he UFA? Or RF?

If he is restricted trade BJ.
 

Scott MS

Registered
Joined
Mar 8, 2004
Posts
4,144
Reaction score
15
This is all crazy talk. Unless Boldin wants out and becomes a problem, he's under contract through the 2006 season. He signed a 4 year deal in 2003. The contract he received was what a middle 2nd round choice gets, not the 3rd overall pick. That's reality.

Boldin signed a four year contract worth 2.58 million with a 1.2 million in signing bonus after the draft.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,136
Reaction score
39,717
john h said:
We are receiver heavy and lack a QB or a RB. This cries for a trade if a fair one can be found. I would not care what receiver we traded as without a running game and QB none of our receivers will help this team reach .500

We needed a RB and QB last year and need the same this year. Until we resolve this problem we are doomed to be mediocre at best. I watch the Cards to see them win not to watch any wide receiver no matter who he is.


The reality is because of injury and QB play Boldin's market value isn't great, especially with the whole NFL knowing they'd have to renegotiate his contract TOO if they traded for him. We do need a QB and a RB, but we won't get a guaranteed guy at either position for Quan IMHO. He's much more valuable to us right now as a player, than trade value.

It wouldn't stun me, Rosenhaus has a history of getting players out of one team to another. I just don't think Quan wants out I think he just wants to be paid more like his level of play.
 

CaptTurbo

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 5, 2003
Posts
16,782
Reaction score
5
Location
Pennsylvania
Of course Navarre could win 5 in a row like Brady and all we need is a RB and 1 decent OL. :thumbup:


Its amazing how a great QB makes everyone else so much better.
 

EndZone

Hall of Famer
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
2,369
Reaction score
38
Location
New York
spanky1 said:
Reason #1: Fitzgerald and Boldin are competing within the same space......ie, they are both slot receivers. Fitzgerald has better upside as a slot receiver than Boldin.......irrespective of the "Q's" performance last year.

Reason #2: Anquan is feeling that he's every bit as good as Fitz and should be signed to a contract as good as Larry's. Too much money for similar skills.

Reason #3: While both have their heads together, they will become divisive/overly competitive against each other "going forward".

Reason #4: Whether right or wrong.......Fitz is Green's guy.

Reason #5: Boldin has really good trade value right now. He could be traded to a team with a top 10 pick.

Reason #6: I'm of the mind that his knees will eventually come back to haunt us.

Reason #7: Really good WR's can be had at multiple times during the draft (ie Mark Clayton/TB; Keary Colbert/Panthers)

Reason #8: We have a chance to fix more important holes by trading him for a top 10 pick, and another top 10 pick would be really helpful in this years draft......cuz I think this is the last year that we will be drafting in the top 15 for awhile......make hay while the sun shines.

:biglaugh:
 

LoyaltyisaCurse

IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Posts
53,873
Reaction score
19,669
Location
CA
spanky1 said:
Reason #1: Fitzgerald and Boldin are competing within the same space......ie, they are both slot receivers. Fitzgerald has better upside as a slot receiver than Boldin.......irrespective of the "Q's" performance last year.

Reason #2: Anquan is feeling that he's every bit as good as Fitz and should be signed to a contract as good as Larry's. Too much money for similar skills.

Reason #3: While both have their heads together, they will become divisive/overly competitive against each other "going forward".

Reason #4: Whether right or wrong.......Fitz is Green's guy.

Reason #5: Boldin has really good trade value right now. He could be traded to a team with a top 10 pick.

Reason #6: I'm of the mind that his knees will eventually come back to haunt us.

Reason #7: Really good WR's can be had at multiple times during the draft (ie Mark Clayton/TB; Keary Colbert/Panthers)

Reason #8: We have a chance to fix more important holes by trading him for a top 10 pick, and another top 10 pick would be really helpful in this years draft......cuz I think this is the last year that we will be drafting in the top 15 for awhile......make hay while the sun shines.
:eek: :lmao:
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
Some words just keep coming back and smacking you in the mouth. Now All can see that Q is by a pretty fair distance our best player in our offense and probably on our team. I wish he would play CB also.

GBR
40
Beat teh Skins
8-8
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,102
Posts
5,433,201
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top