Why I would trade Boldin........

john h

Registered User
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
10,552
Reaction score
13
Location
Little Rock
spanky1 said:
Reason #1: Fitzgerald and Boldin are competing within the same space......ie, they are both slot receivers. Fitzgerald has better upside as a slot receiver than Boldin.......irrespective of the "Q's" performance last year.

Reason #2: Anquan is feeling that he's every bit as good as Fitz and should be signed to a contract as good as Larry's. Too much money for similar skills.

Reason #3: While both have their heads together, they will become divisive/overly competitive against each other "going forward".

Reason #4: Whether right or wrong.......Fitz is Green's guy.

Reason #5: Boldin has really good trade value right now. He could be traded to a team with a top 10 pick.

Reason #6: I'm of the mind that his knees will eventually come back to haunt us.

Reason #7: Really good WR's can be had at multiple times during the draft (ie Mark Clayton/TB; Keary Colbert/Panthers)

Reason #8: We have a chance to fix more important holes by trading him for a top 10 pick, and another top 10 pick would be really helpful in this years draft......cuz I think this is the last year that we will be drafting in the top 15 for awhile......make hay while the sun shines.

No way would I trade Boldin. You always need two receivers. Two great ones present very difficult choices for a defense. One could get hurt. To trade Boldin I would want an all pro who is young and a skill player such as a QB,RB or perhaps an all pro LB. Other than than we keep this young man for as long as we can. Boldin commented yesterday having Fitz makes his job easier. Sure makes the QB's job easier.
 

100%CardsFan

100% embarrassed
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Posts
7,190
Reaction score
17
Location
THIS ONE IS FOR YOU KOC. TIM WE DID IT.
spanky1 said:
Reason #1: Fitzgerald and Boldin are competing within the same space......ie, they are both slot receivers. Fitzgerald has better upside as a slot receiver than Boldin.......irrespective of the "Q's" performance last year.

Reason #2: Anquan is feeling that he's every bit as good as Fitz and should be signed to a contract as good as Larry's. Too much money for similar skills.

Reason #3: While both have their heads together, they will become divisive/overly competitive against each other "going forward".

Reason #4: Whether right or wrong.......Fitz is Green's guy.

Reason #5: Boldin has really good trade value right now. He could be traded to a team with a top 10 pick.

Reason #6: I'm of the mind that his knees will eventually come back to haunt us.

Reason #7: Really good WR's can be had at multiple times during the draft (ie Mark Clayton/TB; Keary Colbert/Panthers)

Reason #8: We have a chance to fix more important holes by trading him for a top 10 pick, and another top 10 pick would be really helpful in this years draft......cuz I think this is the last year that we will be drafting in the top 15 for awhile......make hay while the sun shines.


WTF ARE YOU THINKING MAN?!?!?! Didnt you see the catches he had this year for TD's!!! ARE YOU BLIND!!!!! :biglaugh:
 

arthurracoon

The Cardinal Smiles
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Posts
16,534
Reaction score
1
Location
Nashville
Just for everyone to keep in mind, this is a bumpalicious bump from over a year ago.
 

100%CardsFan

100% embarrassed
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Posts
7,190
Reaction score
17
Location
THIS ONE IS FOR YOU KOC. TIM WE DID IT.
red desert said:
Yeah, I saw tango's name and thought I was in a time warp.

If you want to really treat yourself he is on the main board telling everyone that they are idiots and posting his famous "amazing simply amazing" The best thing was Tango was making fun of someone for living in Iowa!! LOL Idaho kicks Iowas ass!!! LMFAO
 

Brian

PANEM ET CIRCENSES
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Posts
8,022
Reaction score
280
Location
With the mob
100%CardsFan said:
If you want to really treat yourself he is on the main board telling everyone that they are idiots and posting his famous "amazing simply amazing" The best thing was Tango was making fun of someone for living in Iowa!! LOL Idaho kicks Iowas ass!!! LMFAO

The one thing Idaho has in it's favor is that they are known for being extremely religious.

God Bless Idaho Cards Fans.
 

100%CardsFan

100% embarrassed
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Posts
7,190
Reaction score
17
Location
THIS ONE IS FOR YOU KOC. TIM WE DID IT.
HarleyRider said:
The one thing Idaho has in it's favor is that they are known for being extremely religious.

God Bless Idaho Cards Fans.

Well then nevermind. May the Lord Almighty shine down on our deer molesting friend Tango and give him conviction of what he has done to so many innocent creatures of the wildlife of Idaho.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
I have heard this comparison more and more these sundays and it is so apt. He is T.O. with a better attitude. The only other reciever i have seen with this build make those plays is Owens. And Boldin mioght be even better four years down the road. This guy is the man.......
 

BigRedFan

Registered
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Posts
1,114
Reaction score
2
Why mess with something that works? They are hardly getting in the way of each other, consistently getting 100+ yards each. I think we have more important issues to address first.
 

JasonKGME

I'm a uncle's monkey??
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
1,286
Reaction score
1
Location
Justin, TX
dreamcastrocks said:
Ok. Signing bonuses aside, (because having 2 top 10 picks in the same draft is nearly impossible to sign them both) I would be hard pressed to make the trade.

You know sometimes you get a hunch with some players. Bush would be one of them. He may not do anything in the NFL, but he may turn into one of the best backs in history. Drafting Bush will put butts in the seats, better than any other player has been able to for the Cards.

As much as I love Boldin, hell he alone made me $25 on the game last night. A player like Bush has the ability to change the entire franchise around. Boldin's even record numbers have done little to change the fortunes of this franchise. The bottom line is winning. That is what I am looking for.

I know for sure that I wouldn't have been blasted as hard if he would have made his 2nd Godlike TD of the year. That's ok. I expected it.

It reminds me of when San Diego traded Michael Vick for what came to be LT and Drew Brees? Who won in that situation? You could argue either one, or both, but both teams were basically in a rut until the both made a major change. Trading Boldin, as much as I hate to do it, could finally change our fortunes.


Doing what it takes to trade for Bush = Great idea.

Trading Boldin for Bush = Crappy idea.


You do not make your team better by trading one superstar for another, you make your team better by accumalating more stars.



Trade Arrington, this years #1, this years #3, next years #1 and next years #5 to trade up for Bush if thats what it takes. No matter what you do not trade the following players: Boldin, Fitzgerald, Berry, Rackers, and Dansby. Almost anyone else is fair game (yes even Davis tho I still like him and would like to keep him, he is a top half LT, but not currently a top 5 LT, and Adrian Wilson as well, same concept), Boldin & Fitz are top 10 WR's, Berry is a top 5 DE, Rackers is the #1 kicker, and Dansby just has so much damn upside that I can't see how he wont end up being a top 5 LB. These are players you just can not trade because almost no matter who you get in return your not going to increase the level of your team enough based on what you are giving up.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,427
Reaction score
12,177
Snake said:
KiJana Carter.. Ryan Leaf.. Rick Mirer.. Heath Shuler.. Tony Mandarich..

What do they all have in common?? They were all players that many had a hunch would turn the NFL on it's ear.. All of them fell flat on their faces, for one reason or another.

See Peyton Manning, Eli Manning, LT, Vick, Palmer, I could go on and on as well about players that came in and turned franchises around. Drafting is all about taking a hunch and playing it. Sometimes you have to get lucky, and sometimes you have to have the balls to gamble. You usually do not have to trade All Pro players to gamble with, but you usually do not see players like Bush coming out every year.

Point is, although many have the same hunch of Bush that you do (present company included), no way do I trade one of the keys to this team's offense to move up to get him.
This is one place where we differ. NO ONE on this team is untradeable IMO. If the right deal comes around, I will trade anyone on this roster for Peyton Manning, Michael Vick, etc. I know that we have a nice core to build around, but our team is not good enough yet to secure anyone's job if the price is right IMHO.

We KNOW what Boldin brings to the table. With Bush, who's to say he's not the next KiJana Carter?
ME x 1000, as well as every expert that has watched him play, or written a review of him thinks the same. KiJana Carter he will not be, you can quote me on that!

Anyone else, besides Boldin, Fitzgerald, Dansby and Rolle I'd be alright with trading. However, Boldin.. no.
See above

Perhaps, but what about when the Honeymoon period ends? New Stadium, Flashy new players... New Coaches.. What's going to win is staying pat with the playmakers they have, filling in the blanks at positions of need and maintaining the growth. Giving up Boldin sets them back. It really does..

When the honeymood period ends, we may have 5000+ more season ticket holders than we did last year. I do not remember the figure, but Vick was said to bring in over 10,000 more season tickets holders. LeBron James brought in 6,000 tickets (hate to use basketball analogies here, there are other factors to bring in as well, local boy etc) Can you imagine what 5,000 extra fans would do to our home games? We would actually have a home game! That doesn't count the fact of the one game tickets he would be able to generate. I know that there is no way that I can guarantee 5,000 extra season tickets, but I do not see that number as a stretch at all.


You are right, I know that trading Boldin would not be good for the immediate future though, but about a year from now, what about 2 or even 5 years from now. Bush is as much of a sure thing that you will EVER see in an NFL draft. I would also trade Boldin for Leinart as well, but that trade IMO could be scrutinized much more, due to prior injuries and such. He is about as sure as they come as well. Let's face it. Eventhough the Card's future seems as bright as ever right now, we are still the Cards. They need to convince the few of us fans that they still have, and the league that we can win.

I like McCoy, consider him a good guy and a friend, but do you feel confident going in to next season with he or Bryant Johnson as the #2 receiver? Maybe in a few years (for McCoy) but not now.

Anyone that does not have butterfingers is more than adequate for a number 2 receiver besides Fitzgerald. We KNOW that Boldin can do that and more. I am confident that McCoy would do that, if thrust into that role.

Good point, but the difference here is the Falcons and Chargers didn't trade proven players, who are already established as top of the rung at their respective positions. They traded draft picks (and a few players who were basically solid, but nothing of All Pro value like Boldin is).

Of course you are right here. Mostly draft picks were traded. The Falcons didn't really have an All Pro value player on the roster before Vick that could have been traded. They have a couple more now though. I think that if they had a player like Boldin on that team at the time of the draft, they would have been willing to trade him. So would I.

Look, I am not saying that this would be an easy decision. In fact, it would be one of the biggest decisions in franchise history. My point is that you cannot be afraid to gamble, especially in this draft where you may have as many as 4 or 5 All Pro valued players and at more important positions (QB, RB, OT, MLB (although MLB is a more important position, there is not one of all pro caliber in this years draft that is more important that Boldin))when you already have an All Pro receiver on your roster.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,427
Reaction score
12,177
JasonKGME said:
Doing what it takes to trade for Bush = Great idea.

Trading Boldin for Bush = Crappy idea.

Wow, that is so contradicting!!

If doing what it takes means that you trade Boldin, then I guess you aren't willing to do what it takes, are you?
You do not make your team better by trading one superstar for another, you make your team better by accumalating more stars.
Traditionally you are right, but tell that to Denver trading Portis for Champ Bailey. There are a lot of other factors that went into that trade, but behind Denver's line, everyone appears to be a 1000 yard rusher. They clearly got the better end of that trade, hence making that team better in the long run.
 
Last edited:

Shane

My time of year!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
70,541
Reaction score
42,437
Location
Las Vegas
dreamcastrocks said:
Wow, that is so contradicting!!

If doing what it takes means that you trade Boldin, then I guess you aren't willing to do what it takes, are you?

Traditionally you are right, but tell that to Denver trading Portis for Champ Bailey. There are a lot of other factors that went into that trade, but behind Denver's line, everyone appears to be a 1000 yard rusher. They clearly got the better end of that trade, hence making that team better in the long run.

The big diffeence there is that they both traded PROVEN NFL SUPERSTARS. You knew what you are getting.

In Bush we dont. Its that simple.
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,427
Reaction score
12,177
Shane H said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamcastrocks
Wow, that is so contradicting!!

If doing what it takes means that you trade Boldin, then I guess you aren't willing to do what it takes, are you?

Traditionally you are right, but tell that to Denver trading Portis for Champ Bailey. There are a lot of other factors that went into that trade, but behind Denver's line, everyone appears to be a 1000 yard rusher. They clearly got the better end of that trade, hence making that team better in the long run.



The big diffeence there is that they both traded PROVEN NFL SUPERSTARS. You knew what you are getting.

In Bush we dont. Its that simple.

Actually, I was directly refuting this statement....
You do not make your team better by trading one superstar for another
Having nothing to do with the "trading Boldin for Bush" debate.


If someone told you that Bush would come into Arizona and run for 1200 yards and 13 TD's, and catch 40-50 balls and a couple more TD's would you then trade him for Boldin then? I know I would to gain the balanced attack that we would have. If you wouldn't I guess we can end the debate there.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
dreamcastrocks said:
Actually, I was directly refuting this statement....

Having nothing to do with the "trading Boldin for Bush" debate.


If someone told you that Bush would come into Arizona and run for 1200 yards and 13 TD's, and catch 40-50 balls and a couple more TD's would you then trade him for Boldin then? I know I would to gain the balanced attack that we would have. If you wouldn't I guess we can end the debate there.

Considering we had a guy in his 15th season run for 937 and 9 TD's as part of a really bad offense those numbers wouldn't entice me to get rid of Boldin. Make it 1400 yards rushing at 5.5 ypc,another 800 receiving, and 26 TD's and we'll talk.
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
IMO this whole thread is a tad silly. You don't trade your super star that can play RB, QB, WR for a back out of college. I don't care what he has done. I love JJ and think he will be a star in this league, but even though he ran for over 2000 yards plus recieving yards doesn't mean I would have traded him for any of our players out of college.

Q is your poster boy. He sells tickets. look at the highlite real he got national coverage because of his uncanny ability to get to the end zone from anyplace on the field. Q is your spokesperson. Look at all the places he goes for the team. Look at his very active charity. There is two guys I wouldn't trade if we hadn't won a game this year . Fitz and Q and maybe Wilson now that we know how to use him. He could have had near 15-20 sacks this year if he would have been in the same position to do it and Pro bowl which is still possable.

Besides what would I do with all my Q stuff?

GBR
40
Beat the Skins
8-8
 

JasonKGME

I'm a uncle's monkey??
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
1,286
Reaction score
1
Location
Justin, TX
dreamcastrocks said:
Wow, that is so contradicting!!

If doing what it takes means that you trade Boldin, then I guess you aren't willing to do what it takes, are you?

Doing whatever it takes within reason, If I asked you to get reggie bush you have to trade away every draft pick for the next 5 years would you do it? Hell no. So do whatever it takes (within reason) to trade up for Bush, trading Boldin is not within reason.


dreamcastrocks said:
Traditionally you are right, but tell that to Denver trading Portis for Champ Bailey. There are a lot of other factors that went into that trade, but behind Denver's line, everyone appears to be a 1000 yard rusher. They clearly got the better end of that trade, hence making that team better in the long run.


Clinton Portis 2003
1591 yards 14 TD's (team totals 2598 yards 20 TD's)

Ruben Drougnes 2004
1240 yards 6 TD's (team totals 2333 yards 13 TD's)

So Denver did not improve thier rushing team by getting rid of Portis, they lost quite a bit.

Lenny Walls 2003
57 Tackles, 52 Solo, no sacks, 1 fumble recovery, 1 interception for 0 yards

Champ Bailey 2004
81 Tackles, 68 Solo, no sacks, no fumble recoveries, 3 interceptions for 0 yards

They did improve a little with Champ Bailey, but to me this was a lateral move, what they lost in the running game is at least as much as they gained in thier secondary.
 

duckfallas

All Star
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Posts
669
Reaction score
0
If this team were ever stupid enough to trade away Boldin, I'd have to think long and hard about being a fan of this team. Trading away the best player they have would be the dumbest thing the Cardinals could possibly do at this point.

You don't trade players like Anquan Boldin. Ever.
 

conraddobler

I want my 2$
Joined
Sep 1, 2002
Posts
20,052
Reaction score
237
duckfallas said:
If this team were ever stupid enough to trade away Boldin, I'd have to think long and hard about being a fan of this team. Trading away the best player they have would be the dumbest thing the Cardinals could possibly do at this point.

You don't trade players like Anquan Boldin. Ever.


This thread could have been called, why I would saw my own leg off or why I would hit myself in the face with a hammer.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
563,044
Posts
5,490,716
Members
6,341
Latest member
Pickabull7852
Top