- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
^First time in NBA history that both the #1 & #2 seed in a conference lost in GM 1 of the 1st rd of playoffs.
Anyone else feel bad for Amare?
Of course no reason to feel that bad cause he's making major $$$$ but the fact that he hsa to do 3 times the work in NY as he did in PHX. Here he had Nash, Richardson and the best bench in the NBA for help. In NY..he has himself, a completely washed up Billups and a no show in Melo.
I was astonished by that too. I turned the game on with maybe three minutes left and Stoudemire never touched the ball. It was only after the game that I looked at the box score and saw that he had been very productive, while Anthony was just throwing up bricks all game.
And that is the reason, I can't even bring myself to even bother watching the NYK BOS series.he wasn't just being productive, he was simply dominating Garnett in the fourth quarter... and as usual, DA figures out a way for him NOT to even touch the ball in the last 3 minutes.
he's such a terrible coach.
he wasn't just being productive, he was simply dominating Garnett in the fourth quarter... and as usual, DA figures out a way for him NOT to even touch the ball in the last 3 minutes.
he's such a terrible coach.
Sucks to see Amare dominate in the playoffs for a different team.
But at least all the idiots here who wanted him out got their wish.
There are a few things you can always depend on with D'Antoni teams.
I don't miss that guy one bit.
- Struggle on the boards
- Struggle on defense (especially when it counts)
- Offensive confusion when Plan A doesn't work
You mean the same idiots who wanted more rebounding and defense which wins titles?
Yeah....those guys are stupid.
It was also great to watch Amare scream "and-one" several times while missing. It was great watching him argue with the ref while his man gets an easy dunk on the other end. It was great seeing him choke and miss two free throws in the fourth quarter.
Watching NY vs. Boston is just like watching Phoenix Vs. San Antonio before last season.
So then you trade your perennial allstar big man? He might not have been a great rebounder but decent enough.
By that argument why is Nash still on the team?
It's a joke that the Suns are all that into having Steve Nash retire as a 40 year old leading a mediocre team but did not keep their true franchise player who RECRUITED Nash in the first place and never played for another team.
Yeah you have to surround Nash with great shooters, great defenders and a pick and roll threat.
Sounds easy considering 99% of the NBA teams need shooters that can also defend very well.
I didn't say that JRich is playing worse than Carter.Worse? JRich is not playing worse than Carter. He had a bad game one but that doesn't mean overall he is worse than Carter. Second, JRich fits this system perfectly. It's no coincidence that his numbers went down after playing in a more methodical system in Orlando than in Phoenix.
I didn't say that JRich is playing worse than Carter.
I questioned the philosophy written by SirStefan32 that said, "If J-Rich keeps playing like he played yesterday, we might be able to sign him cheap this summer. He looked worse than Vince Carter."
If that were the case, why would we want to sign him? You answered the question, referring to the different systems in Orlando and Phoenix.
This is not a valid comparison. Amare will be making $20M/year. Nash makes $10M/year. That is a huge difference. If Nash was a free agent asking for $20M/year, he wouldn't be here anymore. As always, it all comes down to money.It's a joke that the Suns are all that into having Steve Nash retire as a 40 year old leading a mediocre team but did not keep their true franchise player who RECRUITED Nash in the first place and never played for another team.
Yeah but in Amare's case, you would have to have a great defending Center, SF, and SG at the very least. Most teams have trouble getting their hands on one very good defender let alone 3.
Also rebounders come at a premium and chances are one of them would have to be a damn good defender.
Pick your poison. I don't think one would be easier than the other.
This just in from Chicago: NbA refs are turrble.
It was for both, but in both games, the Bulls D clamped down on defense. No one on Indy could make a shot in crunch time. Most of them didn't seem to want to shoot.Is that from Chicago's perspective or from Indy's?
I didn't see the last of that game, but from what I'm reading online, it sounds like the Bulls were the benefactors of two bad calls in crunch time. True? Arguable?
The Thuggets got flat out robbed in their first game, and the NBA apologized. It couldn't have been as bad as that, could it?
DA... just classic DA...
I love how DA gets the blame for what the idiots on the court do. You don't think he wanted Anthony taking EVERY shot in the final 5 minutes of that game?
What DA does deserve bad credit for is not finding room for Anthony Randolph and Corey Brewer. They are starting Jared Jefferies and watching him turn the ball over with 15 seconds left in the game...