I remember that. I was glad to be getting Jackson, or Tatum, and would have been happy with either. I liked Fox but mainly because the Lakers were going Ball and Fox did a good job of getting under his skin in college and shutting him when they played each other. I think that would have been something to add to the Suns and Lakers for years to come if we went that way but since we had Bledsoe, and no obvious sign that would be changing, I wasn't a fan of taking a backup at #4.
I remember a lot of people being upset about the Suns falling to #4 though. Most knew were weren't getting #1 or #2 but prior to the lottery drawing I remember people talking about the draft like it was a 3 player draft, in a way, with Fultz and Ball going #1 and #2 and Jackson being the best of the rest. When the Suns fell to #4 it was looking like we'd end up "settling" for Tatum. Tatum has been the top player from that class though so settling for him wouldn't have been bad at all. I understood the concerns with him though, that he was more one dimensional as offensive player. Jackson was viewed as a defensive ace whose offense needed work but I don't think anyone realized it needed as much as it did/does.
While JJ's play has been an issue this year, he showed enough last year that we need to be patient. It was like what Chriss showed in his rookie year, he showed real talent and that he could carry a team on both ends of the floor when things were clicking. He was averaging over 20 a game in the last month of the season, without Booker and Warren regularly, but it was a nice glimpse of what he could be.