I feel like I'm in crazy town taking crazy pills when I agree with
@Krangthebrain and
@TJ and
@kerouac9 are the two I don't see eye to eye here with.
Maybe it's just a matter of real expectations vs. baseline definitions of "success," but for the life of me I don't know how we can make comparisons to Dak or RG3 and consider it the baseline for success. Sure, lofty expectations have been set by Club Kyler, but that doesn't mean that having the best rookie season ever is the only way to see the bright side in future development for the player.
In both the situation of Dak and RG3, they inherited rosters with decent-to-great offensive line play and running backs that took the pressure off of them. But pointing to RG3's 700 yard rushing is scary, considering it's what scuttled his career.
Let's come back to Earth guys. Kyler is in a rocky situation with a bad offensive line, rookie receivers, and an RB that we're all hoping rounds back into form.
Even if Kyler falls out of the top ten best rookie QB performances of the past 20 years or so, it won't mean it was because he was terrible. Now, we'll see what he becomes, but have patience.
Washington's offensive line RG3's rookie season had one first-round pick in Trent Williams, a second round pick in Chris Chester, and no one else who was drafted before the 4th round. Alfred Morris was a rookie 6th round pick in RG3's rookie season.
The whole point in getting a dual threat QB is that it takes the pressure off the offensive line because the QB can protect himself with his feet.
The whole point of getting an innovative offensive playcaller is that you can better game plan around offensive line deficiencies.
I'm interested in understanding why people think that Murray is going to throw a lot of picks as a rookie. In general, mobile rookies don't throw a ton of INTs, because they can buy time in and around the pocket until a clean throw opens up. They've learned (for better or worse) that it's better to wait a moment until a guy is open-open.
I'd also argue that if Kingsbury is installing a quick-passing, fast-break offense that we anticipate, Kyler is going to have 1-2 extremely open reads and then he'll be running. Rookie pocket QBs who throw a lot of picks are generally waiting for guys to get open or throwing more difficult routes that they could in college.
For reference, I looked back at some key rookie seasons since Tim Tebow's rookie year for mobile/dual threat QBs (DTs) and Pocket Passers (PPs) to see what we could expect. Obviously, no comparison is perfect, but consider it a broader sample:
Name Year QB Style Passes Passing Yards YPA Passing DVOA QBR Passing TD INT Rushes Rushing Yards Rushing TD Rushing DVOA Total Yards Total TDs
Baker Mayfield 2018 DT 509 3549 7.0 8.1% 53.9 27 14 25 143 0 -28.70% 3692 27
Sam Darnold 2018 PP 445 2653 6.0 -15.1% 48.4 17 9 30 146 1 0.30% 2799 18
Josh Allen 2018 DT 350 1840 5.3 -35.9% 52 10 11 81 638 8 33.40% 2478 18
Josh Rosen 2018 PP 438 1949 4.4 -53.0% 26.1 11 14 15 156 0 30.80% 2105 11
Mitchell Trubisky 2017 DT 362 1981 5.5 -16.8% 32.4 7 7 33 255 2 22.00% 2236 9
Deshaun Watson 2017 DT 221 1583 7.2 23.1% 83.5 19 6 51 363 6 46.10% 1946 25
Carson Wentz 2016 DT 641 3580 5.6 -12.0% 52.8 16 14 33 154 2 -3.60% 3734 18
Dak Prescott 2016 DT 483 3527 7.3 28.9% 81.5 23 4 44 301 6 46.70% 3828 29
Jameis Winston 2015 PP 560 3828 6.8 2.1% 58.6 22 15 41 223 6 7.60% 4051 28
Marcus Mariota 2015 DT 407 2551 6.3 -13.2% 61 19 10 32 253 2 -0.60% 2804 21
Blake Bortles 2014 DT 530 2554 4.8 -40.7% 21.9 11 16 52 422 0 24.70% 2976 11
Teddy Bridgewater 2014 PP 436 2656 6.1 -16.9% 50.2 14 11 40 220 1 -8.50% 2876 15
Derek Carr 2014 PP 622 3071 4.9 -14.9% 38.4 21 12 18 106 0 28.40% 3177 21
E.J. Manuel 2013 PP 335 1814 5.4 -19.9% 42.3 11 9 39 217 2 11.00% 2031 13
Geno Smith 2013 PP 485 2739 5.6 -23.6% 35.9 12 21 60 388 6 9.50% 3127 18
Mike Glennon 2013 PP 459 2260 4.9 -7.7% 45.6 19 9 15 68 9 -45.60% 2328 28
Andrew Luck 2012 DT 622 4089 6.6 -5.1% 65 23 17 42 270 5 41.00% 4359 28
Robert Griffin III 2012 DT 425 2961 7.0 16.6% 71.4 20 5 110 816 7 7.80% 3777 27
Ryan Tannehilll 2012 DT 517 3069 5.9 -9.9% 52.3 12 13 33 216 2 -11.00% 3285 14
Brandon Weeden 2012 PP 546 3185 5.8 -19.4% 26.6 14 17 21 116 0 8.00% 3301 14
Russell Wilson 2012 DT 432 2935 6.8 19.7% 69.6 26 9 82 501 4 22.30% 3436 30
Cam Newton 2011 DT 551 3810 6.9 0.8% 55 21 17 117 718 14 14.50% 4528 35
Blaine Gabbert 2011 DT 457 1888 4.1 -46.5% 20.6 12 11 29 107 0 -38.90% 1995 12
Christian Ponder 2011 PP 321 1698 5.3 -30.2% 33.7 13 12 25 217 0 36.50% 1915 13
Andy Dalton 2011 PP 540 3224 6.0 5.6% 45.6 20 13 29 163 1 -14.60% 3387 21
Sam Bradford 2010 PP 622 3262 5.2 -15.6% 41.5 18 13 17 72 1 -6.00% 3334 19
MEAN DT
14 464 2787 6.0 -8.6% 52.9 17.2 11 53 351 3.9 9.1% 3138 21
MEAN PP
12 484 2695 5.6 -17.4% 41.1 16 13 29 174 2.3 4.8% 2869 18
MEAN ROOKIE
474 2779 5.9 -11.2% 48.68 16.8 11.9 42.8 278.8 3.3 9.0% 3058 20
Sorry the formatting is bad. I don't know if you can build a table in this format. Hopefully, you can see the key takeaway here (for me): Dual threat rookie's on average have a better passing DVOA (-17.4% vs -8.6%) and 11+ point advantage in QBR (as calculated by Football Outsiders).
Interestingly, there isn't a meaningful difference in TDs.