Should have been 2 games. 1 for the stomp and 1 for inciting the crowd. Might have been 2 games if the Warriors weren't in position to be swept. The league doesn't want to be viewed as the bad guy or scapegoat though. Without Draymond in game 3, Sabonis is going to have a field day inside. Expect to see him drop no less than 30.
Not necessarily. I assume they will start Kuminga instead. Sabonis will still guard Looney but now there's not 2 guys on the court you can just back off if you're Sabonis, he'll have to guard Kuminga or he'll score the ball. Sabonis has 8 fouls in 2 games, 5 in game 2. That's without him really having to guard his own man much. He'll have to work harder on defense.
Obviously Kuminga is not Draymond he's not as good a defender. The real issue will be rebounds, Looney has to play more now because Draymond had 13 boards in 2 games and they will have to replace that.
I also will again say I think you can look for the Warriors to look at possibly going smaller at times and having only 1 big on the court, maybe even Kuminga, but more likely Looney. Steph, Klay, Wiggs, Looney and say Payton or DiVincenzo for stretches and see if the Kings can defend that lineup.
Certainly hurts the Warriors defense and it changes the offense because Steph has to play on the ball more. Or they can just flip the whole thing and start Poole for Draymond and say Murray has to guard 1 of those 3 and whoever he guards we're going at him? Poole has not been good in either game, much better in game 1, maybe the Warriors just decide to let it rip and go REALLY small and try to get Poole loose?