2024 Draft Countdown/NFL Prospects thread

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
5,785
Location
Scarsdale, NY
If and it's a big IF we had two VG DL-men then it would have been easier for Stills to make an impression, imo. I don't know if he's any good and probably won't until we improve our DL. Now I'll try to figure whose opinion I should give greater weight, yours or Monti's. A tough call.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,513
Reaction score
7,783
If and it's a big IF we had two VG DL-men then it would have been easier for Stills to make an impression, imo. I don't know if he's any good and probably won't until we improve our DL. Now I'll try to figure whose opinion I should give greater weight, yours or Monti's. A tough call.
I’m not sure I follow your logic.
To me, if you have to have good players around you to be good, then you’re probably not all that good yourself.

You could put Aaron Donald on line with 3 stiffs and he’s still going to be good.

Stills can maybe be an effective role player but that’s probably his ceiling.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,496
Reaction score
34,498
Location
Charlotte, NC
I’m not sure I follow your logic.
To me, if you have to have good players around you to be good, then you’re probably not all that good yourself.

You could put Aaron Donald on line with 3 stiffs and he’s still going to be good.

Stills can maybe be an effective role player but that’s probably his ceiling.
Even getting a rotation DL that late in the draft is a win.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,305
Reaction score
26,942
Location
Orlando, FL
Bears inexplicably offered the 2nd and 3rd picks for the 1st pick. And then the real fun began

You must be registered for see images attach
Newton will be long gone. Bowers is great but major injury concerns. Can’t see taking 3 WRs.
 

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
3,571
Reaction score
7,411
Location
Orange County, CA
The post week 8 draft order projection from The Athletic:
TeamProjected WinsPlayoff Chance
1. Arizona4.30.2%
2. Carolina -> Chicago4.60.6%
3. Chicago4.91.1%
4. NY Giants5.22.1%
5. New England5.82.3%
6. Washington6.14.1%
7. Denver6.31.5%
8. Las Vegas6.52.9%
9. Green Bay7.224.2%
10. Tennessee7.410.6%

Once again, with the Cardinals in the top spot but Chicago in both of the other top-3 spots, it bodes well for the Cardinals to either get one of the top QBs, or reap a bounty of picks to a QB-needy team... but poorly for their chances of getting Marvin Harrison Jr. if they trade down, since the Bears would presumably take a QB and Harrison with their picks.

Would the Giants trade up to #1 for a QB after investing in Jones? Would Belichick trade up to #1 no matter how much the Patriots need a QB? For sure Washington would be happy to part with some of their newly acquired draft picks plus future #1's for the chance to get their QBOF.

The article accompanying the table notes that Tennessee's projected win total increased by 2 after their win over the Falcons with Will Levis at QB, suggesting that their model is accounting for Levis' increased ability to win games vs. Tannehill. With that in mind, the model presumably already accounts for Murray's expected impact on the Cardinals' win total - though perhaps there will be a significant update once Murray actually starts playing, if he plays well.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,444
Reaction score
16,682
Location
Modesto, California
Not really. It's pretty easy to tell that Michael Wilson can play in this league (if he can stay healthy). I think Demercado can be a backup through this contract (probably a #3 on a good team).

Stills doesn't really do anything. He's not clearly better than L.J. Collier or Leki Fotu. He's a low-salary-cap number on a bad team. He isn't going to be a starter on a playoff team.

If you're not thinking about how a player can fit on the roster of a playoff team, you might have a poverty fan mindset.
if you think a rookie D Lineman wont get better over a few seasons.... what mindset is that exactly? Low football IQ? Stills has shown every sign of being a player... he just needs to develop a little. Most big men in the nfl do.

for reference... QUinnen Williams, who I and many others wanted... had 28 tackles and 2.5 sacks in his rookie season... but he developed into a beast...

stills has 21 tackles and 2.5 sacks right now...halfway through his rookie season.

this whole Toddler mindset..."I gotta get what I want RIGHT NOW.... just doesnt work in most cases in the nfl...especially not with the big men where power is more important than speed.
 
Last edited:

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
5,785
Location
Scarsdale, NY
if you think a rookie D Lineman wont get better over a few seasons.... what mindset is that exactly? Low football IQ? Stills has shown every sign of being a player... he just needs to develop a little. Most big men in the nfl do.

for reference... QUinnen Williams, who I and many others wanted... had 28 tackles and 2.5 sacks in his rookie season... but he developed into a beast...

stills has 21 tackles and 2.5 sacks right now...halfway through his rookie season.

this whole Toddler mindset..."I gotta get what I want RIGHT NOW.... just doesnt work in most cases in the nfl...especially not with the big men where power is more important than speed.
oaken, thanks for your thoughtful analysis.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
40,098
Reaction score
24,558
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
I love the idea of having the #1 pick, but think it's a false hope. The schedule gets easier and we'll probably have KM back in a week or two. And we have to remember that there are teams who are tanking in an effort to secure the top spot.
You're probably right, although we're one of those tanking teams. I don't mind not getting the #1, so long as Chicago isn't at #1 and #2 and we're at #3 :)
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
5,785
Location
Scarsdale, NY
You're probably right, although we're one of those tanking teams. I don't mind not getting the #1, so long as Chicago isn't at #1 and #2 and we're at #3 :)
#3 wouldn't be bad, the way you describe it. Worst case, imo, is that Chicago goes QB at #1 and MHJ at #2. Then sitting at #3 we'd probably be able to field a lot of offers from teams that want a QB. Or if the Bears draft a QB and then trade with a team that wants a QB, MHJ would be available.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,305
Reaction score
26,942
Location
Orlando, FL
If and it's a big IF we had two VG DL-men then it would have been easier for Stills to make an impression, imo. I don't know if he's any good and probably won't until we improve our DL. Now I'll try to figure whose opinion I should give greater weight, yours or Monti's. A tough call.
Fixing the DL will be tough. If Murray stays there are FA options. The draft is thin as usual. Best guys are undersized.
 

daves

Keepin' it real!
Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Posts
3,571
Reaction score
7,411
Location
Orange County, CA
Clearly the Cards will end up at #2 with the Bears at #1 and #3, or perhaps the Giants or other non-QB-needy team at #3. Then while arguing about whether the team should keep or trade Murray, we can also argue for eternity whether the Cards should take Harrison Jr. at #2 or trade down for a huge haul of picks. This is the Cardinals / ASFN way.
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,496
Reaction score
34,498
Location
Charlotte, NC
Clearly the Cards will end up at #2 with the Bears at #1 and #3, or perhaps the Giants or other non-QB-needy team at #3. Then while arguing about whether the team should keep or trade Murray, we can also argue for eternity whether the Cards should take Harrison Jr. at #2 or trade down for a huge haul of picks. This is the Cardinals / ASFN way.
I still trade down in this scenario. Maye goes #2. He makes NFL plays and has pedigree.
 

Garthshort

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 11, 2002
Posts
9,507
Reaction score
5,785
Location
Scarsdale, NY
I still trade down in this scenario. Maye goes #2. He makes NFL plays and has pedigree.
No idea where we'll finish, but from a historical perspective QB's seem to go higher than where they are ranked. If Kyler is limited to a game or two, which I doubt, then a top three pick seems likely.
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,334
Reaction score
15,555
Location
Charlotte
Love the WR's this year.

I don't think Troy Franklin is getting enough respect.

Keon Coleman - why doesn't he have more production in college? Ceiling is probably DK Metcalf but not sure he plays with as much top end speed as DK. I like a guy like that as the #2 but not #1 - I don't think you can count on him to takeover but you will get some big plays and almost all 50/50 balls.

Who is the comp for Nabers and Odunze?
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,334
Reaction score
15,555
Location
Charlotte
DT's

Newton only played a half but dominated. He looks great.

Leonard Taylor also played well - he is definitely in round 1.

Maason Smith was MIA. Is he injured or not motivated? He is too big/powerful not to make an impact at this level.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,083
Posts
5,431,894
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top