It's a comparison to the other leagueCmon, I feel like those are extremes. Something in between is preferable.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
It's a comparison to the other leagueCmon, I feel like those are extremes. Something in between is preferable.
Any team can win any Sunday, that's what matters
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Parity is the reason the NFL is king.
Any team can win any Sunday, that's what matters
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
It's a comparison to the other league
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Haha. The reverse, or vomiting eaten crow, thread? Won’t be from me. Single success or failure isn’t enough to prove anything.
Okay?Just think about what you just stated there
Parity by definition is that the rules established allow every team to have opportunity. We have still had dynasties in the salary cap era. This is nonsense.Parity by definition means everyone sucks. Free agency means no one can ever develop a dominant cohesive unit. That makes things sub par for everyone.Parity is for losers and 4th place trophies. Parity weakens,it doesnt strengthen.
the nfl was king before any free agency/parity. even the parity is a joke. Its the same 10 teams that still make the playoffs over and over again for 50 years. All parity did was make the teams that suck..continue to still suck but they dont look as bad getting a couple more wins then they use to but still below the teams that always make the playoffs.
Our lack of success isn't because of salary cap rules, for a long time it was management. We didn't become a real football team until Michael took overuntil the sundays that matter. then its the same teams in the playoffs over and over and over.
look at the team you root for. Havent done crap since 1947, till SB 43.
apparently the Cardinals forgot their -any-team- membership card.
Baseball often was the highest payroll = best odds.You know there's more than one other league, right. The NBA is the exception to the rule and has only been that way last year and this year. Hockey isn't like that and neither is baseball.
Baseball often was the highest payroll = best odds.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Our lack of success isn't because of salary cap rules, for a long time it was management. We didn't become a real football team until Michael took over
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Potato potatoThis is no longer parity but pure mediocrity in my opinion
You were saying?Another analogy, using Emmitt Smith in comparison. Different person, different running style, different circumstances regarding his life, different team and coach and older. There are some players you cannot classify. Everyone is always so hell bent towards name association, as if it proves a point when it actually says nothing. You have a guy like Peterson, and how many times does this guy have to make everyone look completely moronic after saying what he cannot do. There is only one back in my observation which remotely compares to Peterson and that is Jim Brown, and I would not have doubted that guy either. I think instead of an analogy, we should be using metaphors because you cannot get a bead on him after what he has accomplished because his feats are not logical and under any other player you may very well be right. Peterson is like freaking Hurricane Harvey, he just keeps coming back, not as strong but still can do a lot of damage to you... and Thomas Jones and his 'decent' career to finish your point holds no merit which should be obvious, reaching for a telephone is not Peterson's kryptonite
Crow chili Monday (and Tuesday and Wednesday, I made a big batch), crow burgers Thursday, crow Sushi Saturday (mmmmm!!) AND I bought a bunch extra for next week because I won't believe it is anything but a blip until I see it again.
Lest we forget
the Bears beat the Ravens
the Giants beat the Broncos
the Jets almost nabbed the Cheatriots and
the 9ers almost took the Redskins
so, 1 game does not a believer make (although I do have all that extra crow on order, if necessary)