Folster
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Posts
- 16,827
- Reaction score
- 7,334
It’s embellished and played out.
They should really find a new slant.
It’s embellished and played out.
At some point there’s nothing new to discuss. On the positive or negative. We pretty much likely know everything there is to know about Ayton.They should really find a new slant.
Ayton played out of position and the article never mentioned that. So they fail for providing some balance.
I think the quote below is where the ESPN article gets too focused.
Using AAU data is weak to me.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/23771351/espn-draft-analytics-model-makes-nba-draft-projections
And the Ringer article seems to primarily focus on defense to knock him.
Ayton is not a finished product. They know he can walk on the NBA floor and contribute a double double.
This got brought up on Bickley's show today and because a freshman season is too small a sample size they go back to the AAU data as well. They wouldn't do that on a 3 or 4 year player
It’s embellished and played out.
No the ringer mentions it and says it didnt effect the block rate of other people in the same situation like KAT and Willy Cauly Stein
Using AAU data is a flaw to the algorithm (outside of some context and something to form a baseline, such as FT%). Not to mention this qualifier, to which I agree and also believe it is another flaw for the rest of their rankings outside the consensus top 4 (which they have):
So much is being made of Aytons poor block and steal rate numbers to criticize his defense and on the flip side so many arguments about his playing alongside ristic and away from the paint to defend him.You can’t even judge players in college because the system they are in won’t be the system they play in the NBA. Wendell Carter specifically mentioned some of his abilities were masked because of Duke’s system, Jay Williams agreed with him being a Duke alum. You can’t really gig Ayton for his defense in college because he had Ristic next to him so he had to do a lot of switching. You put Ayton on a team with a couple of capable defenders and not in a zone and his defense should improve. He has all the tools to be an elite defender he just needs coaching to fix flaws and improve IMO.
Miller isn't a great coach to begin with, but with all the FBI and underachieving going on, I don't see how you can base any good observations on his one year of college. ANd he had spectacular offensive numbers, I expect him to improve across the board right away.So much is being made of Aytons poor block and steal rate numbers to criticize his defense and on the flip side so many arguments about his playing alongside ristic and away from the paint to defend him.
I’m going to take an entirely different tact - I watched him as often as I could this year and unfortunately what my eye test gave me was:
- A dispassionate, unengaged defender
- A player whose defense did not live up to his typically vast physical and athletic superiority over those he was defending against
- A guy whose spatial awareness seemed lacking
- A center who confounded me with poorly timing his block attempts despite have elite athleticism
I found all this surprising because I am a huge Zona and Ayton fan. So I’m not predisposed to look, or hope, for flaws.
And unfortunately I saw these traits over and over again and they didn’t seem, to my observation, to be getting better over the course of the season (though I’m sure someone will provide data showing otherwise).
The most indelibly etched images I have of Ayton defensively are his getting scorched by that unathletic kid from Texas A&M (not Robert Williams, the other guy) and just being used by that undersized “big” from Stanford - who went to town on him INSIDE the paint (not from the perimeter as has seem to become the narrative defending Ayton).
All that said, I am still 100% on the take him #1 wagon and would be shocked and dismayed and concerned if we don’t. But my eyes tell me what they tell me.
So much is being made of Aytons poor block and steal rate numbers to criticize his defense and on the flip side so many arguments about his playing alongside ristic and away from the paint to defend him.
I’m going to take an entirely different tact - I watched him as often as I could this year and unfortunately what my eye test gave me was:
- A dispassionate, unengaged defender
- A player whose defense did not live up to his typically vast physical and athletic superiority over those he was defending against
- A guy whose spatial awareness seemed lacking
- A center who confounded me with poorly timing his block attempts despite have elite athleticism
I found all this surprising because I am a huge Zona and Ayton fan. So I’m not predisposed to look, or hope, for flaws.
And unfortunately I saw these traits over and over again and they didn’t seem, to my observation, to be getting better over the course of the season (though I’m sure someone will provide data showing otherwise).
The most indelibly etched images I have of Ayton defensively are his getting scorched by that unathletic kid from Texas A&M (not Robert Williams, the other guy) and just being used by that undersized “big” from Stanford - who went to town on him INSIDE the paint (not from the perimeter as has seem to become the narrative defending Ayton).
All that said, I am still 100% on the take him #1 wagon and would be shocked and dismayed and concerned if we don’t. But my eyes tell me what they tell me.
Because he projects into today's NBA. Can protect the rim, switch onto guards, has length and a massive standing reach, and shot that projects with a good FT%. Not his fault Izzo refused to use him properly and with limited minutes.
I dont think his upside is as great as some of the other bigs, name Ayton, but you can see the talent and fit into what NBA teams are asking of their C's today.
I agree it’s a limited data set. And I agree Miller isn’t a great coach, that said he has ALWAYS hung his hat on defense. His teams (until this year) have almost always been pretty good defensively. And that’s what’s even more concerning, he had this beast in Ayton and his defense was worse than normal (yes the other guys seemed to stink defensively also - but a lot of them played the prior year and didn’t stink as badly as a team).Miller isn't a great coach to begin with, but with all the FBI and underachieving going on, I don't see how you can base any good observations on his one year of college. ANd he had spectacular offensive numbers, I expect him to improve across the board right away.
So much is being made of Aytons poor block and steal rate numbers to criticize his defense and on the flip side so many arguments about his playing alongside ristic and away from the paint to defend him.
I’m going to take an entirely different tact - I watched him as often as I could this year and unfortunately what my eye test gave me was:
- A dispassionate, unengaged defender
- A player whose defense did not live up to his typically vast physical and athletic superiority over those he was defending against
- A guy whose spatial awareness seemed lacking
- A center who confounded me with poorly timing his block attempts despite have elite athleticism
I found all this surprising because I am a huge Zona and Ayton fan. So I’m not predisposed to look, or hope, for flaws.
And unfortunately I saw these traits over and over again and they didn’t seem, to my observation, to be getting better over the course of the season (though I’m sure someone will provide data showing otherwise).
The most indelibly etched images I have of Ayton defensively are his getting scorched by that unathletic kid from Texas A&M (not Robert Williams, the other guy) and just being used by that undersized “big” from Stanford - who went to town on him INSIDE the paint (not from the perimeter as has seem to become the narrative defending Ayton).
All that said, I am still 100% on the take him #1 wagon and would be shocked and dismayed and concerned if we don’t. But my eyes tell me what they tell me.
Mind you I don’t think he’s a terrible defender, just not a great one and not a true rim protector. He just wasn’t what I would’ve hoped and expected him to be on that end of the floor.Well that is concerning! That would be terrible to have a center that can't/won't defend.
Well that is concerning! That would be terrible to have a center that can't/won't defend.
True. I hope that’s the explanation. He did look a bit like a deer in the headlights.A lack of familiarity or understanding of his role in the defense could be responsible for all of this. Ayton is able to move out and defend guards on the perimeter, but that should be on occasion, not all the time like he did at UofA. I am sure that that was brand new for him. When you have a big that is supposed to defend guards outside and protect the rim, it is quite difficult to know when an how to break off of his man.
I am just appealing that what it LOOKED like, might not actually have been what was happening. Tentative play can look like a lack of motor.
True. I hope that’s the explanation. He did look a bit like a deer in the headlights.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I think Suns should draft Trae Young as PG and would give the team an extremely dynamic and young back court on par with many of the best in the West, especially 2 years down the line.
PG: Trae Young
SG: Devin Booker
SF: TJ Warren
PF: FA, Julius Randall/Derek Favors?
C: Chandler
Not a good synopsis, but the gist is that after crunching the numbers, Ayton's defensive positives outweigh his negatives. If that is accurate and not a straight opinion, that's huge IMO.Whats the synopsis? I don't want to put in my CC info.