If you check the Spurs board, I defend other players who ARE NOT Spurs. I've had defend Nash over Parker many times on a Spur board. NO, I'm not a SPur apologist. That is my squad though since I've been watchin' them as long as I can remember. Iceman used to be my fav player. Any other accusations?
Why would I check out the Spurs board? My statement that you were a Spurs apologist is based on the fact that I see your posts on this Suns board - all of which are in this thread (until the recent couple of posts in the other SA thread), defending Manu Ginobili. Do you not think you're defending Ginobili? An apologist isn't 'apologizing' for anything - he's merely justifying something. This thread is mainly a debate between two sides - those that believe Ginobili is acting irresponsibly by his excessive overexaggeration of contact, and those who disagree. You're on the disagreeing side, and you're presenting issues that try and support that. Since you're doing this by yourself on a Suns board, I call that being an apologist. If I ever went to a Spurs board and started talking about the Suns, I would freely admit to being an apologist. I see nothing offensive about the word.
There are many times that players DON'T know who's around them. Have you ever played the game? It's one of the fastest movin' games in the world and things come at you quickly. Many players hurt anutha' without realizin'. Not once did you hear me say that Barbosa has NO RIGHT to be angry but he should know that things like that will happen on a basketball court. It's not like Manu took a bat to his dome.
I fail to see why you had to "accuse" me of never playing the game. In fact, I frequently play basketball, of all different kinds. You name the type, I've played it, and against people bigger, stronger (and uglier) than me. I am well acquainted with how fast-paced it is - that's why I prefer both watching and playing it over other sports like baseball and football. My point isn't that players never hurt each other without realizing it; it's that doing so is reckless. I said that basketball players
SHOULD be aware of what's going around them. If they fail to do so, then bad things happen. I personally have been injured many times because of other people's lack of awareness and my own. It's a part of othe game, but that doesn't mean it's justified.
If he was on your team, you'd luv him. Trust me. Hate him, he's not.
I can't tell if you're talking about a general Suns fan or me specifically. If it's the former, then I'll shrug and agree. However, if you mean me, then no, I would not luv him. I respect his game and his skills, but the fact that he chronically overexaggerates contact makes me dislike him, even if he were to be on the Suns. The NBA players I like are the ones I wouldn't mind playing basketball with in a real game (style-wise, not skill-wise). That means if I were playing ball with a guy who had a game like Ginobili, I wouldn't want to keep playing with him, even if he were on my same team. That's a personal opinion.
Look, I can see where you're coming from. I've had this kind of debate
many times with a friend of mine who's a Spurs fan. Other than my original first paragraph in my first post (and the rebuttals in this post), the rest of my comments were not directed at you. They're comments on the subject in general. In a nutshell, I think Barbosa's injury was ridiculous because Ginobili made an unnecessary flop against contact from a totally different player. And, that Ginobili should be more careful in his flopping because it's become something reckless. Any time your actions injure another player, and it's something that can be prevented, that's reckless. It can still be an accident, but that doesn't make it a good idea.