SirChaz said:You do realize a MAX contract will break up this team anyway right?
Yes in a year. Not this year. Id be willing to give it another shot. Would you?
SirChaz said:You do realize a MAX contract will break up this team anyway right?
Chaplin said:You also have to take into consideration that some of us don't want to be the Florida Marlins. I would LOVE to win a championship next year, but I would hate to win that one and then automatically rebuild immediately after.
cepstrum said:Ummm... the bucks, sonics, and cavs set the market for shooting guards this year. The suns lowballed him. I just dont understand how people can forget so quickly the season we had last year. We couldve had at least another one like that. An expensive JJ is better then no JJ. Especially on a championship caliber team.
SweetD said:JJ is a great talent but there are many players that can come in at score 17pts a game with this team. JJ is the #4 option why do you want to pay him #1 money when he is not a #1 option on this team. FYI 6yrs 60million is a reasonable offer for a #4 option.
cepstrum said:Yes in a year. Not this year. Id be willing to give it another shot. Would you?
Chaplin said:You also have to take into consideration that some of us don't want to be the Florida Marlins. I would LOVE to win a championship next year, but I would hate to win that one and then automatically rebuild immediately after.
playstation said:marion over the next 4 years is a falling asset while jj is a rising one. i'd rather have JJ.
cepstrum said:Yes in a year. Not this year. Id be willing to give it another shot. Would you?
Chaplin said:Marion is not a "falling" asset, if anything, he would be a steady one. Nash, though, definitely would be a falling asset.
Mulli808 said:Growing up following the Suns, I would gladly accept a championship in exchange for a rebuilding period.
Like Grace said, "Trophy and ring"
playstation said:marion's skillset is based on athleticism. i don't look at him and think 'fundamentally sound'. as his athleticism starts fading (in 4 years he is 31), what do you have left?
cepstrum said:If you think JJ was the 4th option on that team last year, Im not sure how many games you were watching. Even if you think he was, in 2-3 years the core wouldve been him and Amare.
SweetD said:FYI I have missed a total of 20 games in the past 4 years. JJ was a big part of this team since the bench was so poor and Barbosa was not a constant part. Lets see #1 Nash(MVP, ALL-Star), #2 Amare(All-Star), #3 Marion(All-Star), #4 JJ. Yep that looks about right.
Chaplin said:It's arguable that Nash was the #4 option ON OFFENSE, with Amare #1 and JJ #2. Marion is #3, but that might be generous, because, after all, he gets no plays called for him.
Chaplin said:You sound like a hater, or at least, trying to justify why you like JJ more...
If you think JJ was the 4th option on that team last year, Im not sure how many games you were watching. Even if you think he was, in 2-3 years the core wouldve been him and Amare.
Chaplin said:It's arguable that Nash was the #4 option ON OFFENSE, with Amare #1 and JJ #2. Marion is #3, but that might be generous, because, after all, he gets no plays called for him.
playstation said:yes, this is my justification for why i would rather have JJ than Marion. That and one showed up against SA and the other did not.
fyi..Yuma said:Still no word from the league office on this trade, or Raja Bell, either. Maybe no press conference coming up? This seems really weird the JJ trade is taking so long, and a 5 team trade just breezed through yesterday. I bet there's some back room drama going on.....
Chaplin said:Marion is not a "falling" asset, if anything, he would be a steady one. Nash, though, definitely would be a falling asset.