Big Suns Trade?

[DevonCardsFan]

They could also be targeting Ingram. Ingram and picks to SA and Kuzma to the Suns. Just not sure what the Suns give up in the trade, maybe TJ + Chriss or Bender + picks?

Ingram and Kuz to Spurs and Suns 1st rder Milwaukee

Ball and Dend to Suns

Leaonard to Spurs

and Chandler or Dudleys contract plus filler I bet

 

[CardsSunsDbacks]

Ingram and Kuz to Spurs and Suns 1st rder Milwaukee

Ball and Dend to Suns

Leaonard to Spurs

and Chandler or Dudleys contract plus filler I bet

I could live with the idea of trading an asset for Ball, but bringing back a bad contract as well is a tough pill to swallow. It really just comes down to how much you value Ball's potential and I am kind of on the fence on that subject.

 

[DevonCardsFan]

This works

Spurs get - Kuz, Ingram, Chandler, and Troy Daniels

Lakers- Leonard, Ulis

Suns - Ball and Deng

This works, I could see this happening

You must be registered for see images attach

 

[Chaplin]

Why would we do this? Sure, we'd get Ball, but we'd also be helping San Antonio and the Lakers, our two most hated rivals.

 

[Dback Jon]

Why would we do this? Sure, we'd get Ball, but we'd also be helping San Antonio and the Lakers, our two most hated rivals.

Yup. Just makes it harder in the West, because that allows LA to go after Lebron and or PG

 

[DevonCardsFan]

Why would we do this? Sure, we'd get Ball, but we'd also be helping San Antonio and the Lakers, our two most hated rivals.

Because they would be getting Ball for Deng and moving Ulis and Daniels who are good as gone.

McDonough tanked for Ball, Suns wanted to trade up and get him, McDonough gets his PG in exchange for taking Deng

 

[Chaplin]

Because they would be getting Ball for Deng and moving Ulis and Daniels who are good as gone.

McDonough tanked for Ball, Suns wanted to trade up and get him, McDonough gets his PG in exchange for taking Deng

There's A LOT more to it than that.

 

[Proximo]

Why would we do this? Sure, we'd get Ball, but we'd also be helping San Antonio and the Lakers, our two most hated rivals.

Because it is happening with or without us.

Best to get Ball cheap while we can.

 

[Chaplin]

Because it is happening with or without us.

Best to get Ball cheap while we can.

It is? Gambo, is that you?

 

[SunsFanFirst]

Because it is happening with or without us.

Best to get Ball cheap while we can.

It begs the question why would LA want to include and help us.. unless they knew they were giving us a lemon

 

[DevonCardsFan]

There's A LOT more to it than that.

Well apparently you haven't been listening to Az Sports Radio or reading Twitter

There's A LOT more to it than that.

Well your not listening to Az Radio, Leonard is going to be traded, they need some help capwise with a 3rd team. PHX gets the PG of the future they tanked for, for taking Dengs bad contract, McDonough likes ball, just because you don't like it, it is as simple as that


https://www.brightsideofthesun.com/...ros-cons-lonzo-ball-phoenix-suns-lakers-spurs

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

Yup. Just makes it harder in the West, because that allows LA to go after Lebron and or PG

By the time a ball/booker/JJ/bender/Ayton team is ascending to championship level LeBron will be 37 and Paul George will be older and lakers still won’t have cap space.

And spurs are getting a couple dimes and nickels for a quarter.

Oh, and if ball pans out as a stud we become the best team in the nba likely

 

[DevonCardsFan]

It begs the question why would LA want to include and help us.. unless they knew they were giving us a lemon

They need Cap space and want Kuz, with LeBron, Leonard and George, Ball is expendable now

 

[Chaplin]

By the time a ball/booker/JJ/bender/Ayton team is ascending to championship level LeBron will be 37 and Paul George will be older and lakers still won’t have cap space.

And spurs are getting a couple dimes and nickels for a quarter.

Oh, and if ball pans out as a stud we become the best team in the nba likely

What makes you think Ball will pan out?

 

[Chaplin]

I'm sorry this is all ridiculous. And having Suns fans actually posting things as fact when there is very little to go on is embarrassing.

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

It begs the question why would LA want to include and help us.. unless they knew they were giving us a lemon

That line of thinking would derail every trade ever proposed.

 

[ASUCHRIS]

By the time a ball/booker/JJ/bender/Ayton team is ascending to championship level LeBron will be 37 and Paul George will be older and lakers still won’t have cap space.

And spurs are getting a couple dimes and nickels for a quarter.

Oh, and if ball pans out as a stud we become the best team in the nba likely

Exactly! if the alternative is to overpay questionable talent in FA, I'd much rather add Lonzo, and see what the young guys can do. It'll allow us to be patient and see who develops, which could allow us to get the top tier talent when the rest of our youth is ready.

 

[AzStevenCal]

It is? Gambo, is that you?

I went to my inside source 3 times. Here is what I was told: "Signs point to yes", "Outlook good" and lastly "Reply hazy, try again". So...mixed signals.

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

What makes you think Ball will pan out?

The fact that as a rookie he was a good defender, averaged 12/7/7 (which is close to what Kidd averaged - percentages included), and no one batted an eye at his being selected #2 in last year’s touted draft.

 

[Chaplin]

The fact that as a rookie he was a good defender, averaged 12/7/7 (which is close to what Kidd averaged - percentages included), and no one batted an eye at his being selected #2 in last year’s touted draft.

He also has quite possibly the worst shot in the NBA and has a psychotic family. Not sure the pros outweight the cons. If the LAKERS are willing to lose him, then that tells you something.

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

I'm sorry this is all ridiculous. And having Suns fans actually posting things as fact when there is very little to go on is embarrassing.

What is anyone posting as fact? The fact that Kawhi will be traded? And to the lakers? Those are very likely and CERTAINLY not “ridiculous” or “embarrassing.”

 

[Cheesebeef]

He also has quite possibly the worst shot in the NBA and has a psychotic family. Not sure the pros outweight the cons. If the LAKERS are willing to lose him, then that tells you something.

you know what it tells me? the Lakers are willing to lose him in order to possibly GET Lebron and Kawai. That's is a MASSIVE part of the issue at hand.

 

[AzStevenCal]

It begs the question why would LA want to include and help us.. unless they knew they were giving us a lemon

Rumors are that neither Lebron nor Pop want anything to do with Lonzo and family.

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

He also has quite possibly the worst shot in the NBA and has a psychotic family. Not sure the pros outweight the cons. If the LAKERS are willing to lose him, then that tells you something.

Lose him for Lebron, Paul George, and Kawhi . . . yeah that tells me all I need to know.

Again, that’s a “ridiculous” argument chap. You should be “embarrassed” making it. Every time a trade is made no one should do it because the other side is getting rid of a player and “that tells you something.” Sheeesh.

 

[Ouchie-Z-Clown]

Rumors are that neither Lebron nor Pop want anything to do with Lonzo and family.

I understand that. LaVar is the only thing that gives me even a little pause.