Biggest Need.. Receiver?

cardsunsfan

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 25, 2003
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
162
Location
Arizona
Would you guys say we shored our Offensive Line up somewhat? I think our biggest need is wide receiver... I really hope one of the better receivers fall to the top of the second so we can pick them..
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,917
Reaction score
26,027
Location
Orlando, FL
The Cards need a better rush option opposite Jones. You can trade for or get WRs through FA, but you get rushers through the draft. Look what KC paid for Clark.
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,266
Reaction score
15,338
Location
Charlotte
The Cards need a better rush option opposite Jones. You can trade for or get WRs through FA, but you get rushers through the draft. Look what KC paid for Clark.

Do you see any viable options for us round 2 or later?
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
12,989
Reaction score
5,213
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
If you look at any of the draft rankings on different sites, the best rushers would be gone by the time we pick at #33 but some of the top receivers would be there. But of course if we take Bosa in round one it really wouldn't matter.
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
The Cards need a better rush option opposite Jones. You can trade for or get WRs through FA, but you get rushers through the draft. Look what KC paid for Clark.


shoulda kept golden
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
We have a series of roster-holes, with needs ranging from "Meh" to "WTF!" (We each have our own assessments - I'd include our OL in the WTF category but maybe our recent FA additions will change that).

My top three priorities would be: OL, WR and ILB, but not necessarily in that order (There's enough draft talent in the first three rounds to allow us to draft BPA among these positions and not be forced to target specific players in any special order). We could also use another major upgrade at TE, but I'm not sure the available talent is there.

In all three priorities, i'd be looking for at least one "dominant trait" (i.e. the pass rusher who can fly parallel to the ground to the passer; the 6-3 WR who'll win most jump-ball battles; the OG or C who can consistently move his man 3+ yards off the ball.

I agree that we could use two more high-level WR's to provide enough depth at an impact position.

The one factor that can wreck the above strategy is the dude at a position we're OK at, who's so good that he can blow up the way that position is played. (Q Williams and Oliver kind of fit that mold. So too might Murray (if he can deliver on expectations).
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,181
Reaction score
16,270
Location
Modesto, California
I expect a TE or WR with pick 33 unless a top olineman is still on the board.
I prefer a TE honestly since the draft is so deep at WR but only really three deep at TE for guys who make an immediate impact.

I really wish there were more top rated talent along the oline in this draft...even with 18 guys on the roster we need help there
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,459
Reaction score
18,363
Location
The Giant Toaster
I would be pretty pissed if we don’t go heavier on OL than WR but WR is flashier and it’s hard to pass on elite athletes.
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,393
Reaction score
29,777
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Would you guys say we shored our Offensive Line up somewhat? I think our biggest need is wide receiver... I really hope one of the better receivers fall to the top of the second so we can pick them..
Our OL is still trash. ILB is very bad and thin, also.
 

Chris_Sanders

Not Always The Best Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
40,166
Reaction score
31,697
Location
Scottsdale, Az
It might not work out...all physical metrics in the NFL say no... but I will lose my crap if we get Murray and Hollywood.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,060
Reaction score
13,827
I’m good with drafting nothing but offensive lineman and WR’s.
 

THESMEL

Smushdown! Take it like a fan!
Joined
May 21, 2010
Posts
5,963
Reaction score
1,154
Location
Vernon
Well we don’t need more picks with 10 - yes wr - but I still say we have top talent in key core positions - and we are primed to go worse to first with decent coaching
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,476
Reaction score
16,649
Location
San Antonio, Texas
It might not work out...all physical metrics in the NFL say no... but I will lose my crap if we get Murray and Hollywood.

If that happens, even if Murray fails and Hollywood's foot injury becomes a deciding factor... you know before all is said and done there will still be at least three cornerbacks in the NFL which will be on the stupid side of a ESPN highlight reel with this duo lol
 

bojack

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 28, 2015
Posts
1,134
Reaction score
516
I hope we get Harry. He may not end up being as good as Fitz, but I think he will be as liked right up there with Fitz. Hometown kid that from what I've seen of him seems like a class act.
 

dscher

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
13,261
Reaction score
8,313
Location
Mesa, AZ
It might not work out...all physical metrics in the NFL say no... but I will lose my crap if we get Murray and Hollywood.
Speaking of this.. I can't believe Crismon checked out on all this banter.. if there is any time to represent. It's now. Lol
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,712
Reaction score
10,601
We already have 20 o lineman on the roster.

I expect 1 project in the 7th.

Dline and WR are likely to be our early picks.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,659
Posts
5,410,548
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top