Bulls @ Suns game thread 11-19-17

OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,029
Reaction score
58,329
Great to see. The Suns bench contributes 50 points tonight.
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
Nice win, especially considering Booker couldn't make shots he usually makes with ease. They did an excellent job passing/ moving the ball, and they tightened up their defense nicely a couple of times.
I've been concerned about just that, with the talk of giving DBook minutes at the Point. How much can you ask of the young man?

Leave him at Shooting Guard and end any talk of him covering Point Guard or Small Forward. If management doesn't use their heads, they are going to burn him out and complain about his disappointment. Then watch Devin reach his potential on another team and look for another phenom to ruin.

Suns management is so naive. And desperate. Every move is a shot in the dark. A reaction to their ineptitude to cover each position properly.

Plan/delegate/follow-up. The foundation of good management. Will we ever see it on the Phoenix Suns?
 

mjb21aztd

ASFN Icon
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
15,999
Reaction score
8,173
Great win by the suns! Good to see least one team showed up today....

Good to see Jackson get a few rebounds wish he would improve his fteethrow shooting though...
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
I've been concerned about just that, with the talk of giving DBook minutes at the Point. How much can you ask of the young man?

Leave him at Shooting Guard and end any talk of him covering Point Guard or Small Forward. If management doesn't use their heads, they are going to burn him out and complain about his disappointment. Then watch Devin reach his potential on another team and look for another phenom to ruin.

Suns management is so naive. And desperate. Every move is a shot in the dark. A reaction to their ineptitude to cover each position properly.

Plan/delegate/follow-up. The foundation of good management. Will we ever see it on the Phoenix Suns?

Good grief. He only spent a short time at pg and that was at the end of the game. He struggled as much at SG as PG in this game. I guarantee you Booker wants the ball in his hands as much as possible. He was double teamed the entire game. So he passed more and effectively.

Its really funny when a poster on a message board calls a guy like McD with years of experience coming up through the ranks naive. Its really a...well...naive comment.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,467
Reaction score
18,373
Location
The Giant Toaster
I've been concerned about just that, with the talk of giving DBook minutes at the Point. How much can you ask of the young man?

Leave him at Shooting Guard and end any talk of him covering Point Guard or Small Forward. If management doesn't use their heads, they are going to burn him out and complain about his disappointment. Then watch Devin reach his potential on another team and look for another phenom to ruin.

Suns management is so naive. And desperate. Every move is a shot in the dark. A reaction to their ineptitude to cover each position properly.

Plan/delegate/follow-up. The foundation of good management. Will we ever see it on the Phoenix Suns?

Agree completely. Booker is a SG thru and thru. It's good he's unselfish enough to distribute when needed but we need him to reach his potential as an elite scorer.

I'm pro-tank but I'm ready to give up an asset(s) for a PG. Not necessarily pass first but someone legit.
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
Good grief. He only spent a short time at pg and that was at the end of the game. He struggled as much at SG as PG in this game. I guarantee you Booker wants the ball in his hands as much as possible. He was double teamed the entire game. So he passed more and effectively.

Its really funny when a poster on a message board calls a guy like McD with years of experience coming up through the ranks naive. Its really a...well...naive comment.
(A) We do not have a starting calibre Point Guard on the roster. (B) This, following the other extreme -- the earlier experiment of three starting Point Guards, and tweeners at that.

(A) It would be dangerous to lull everyone into the false security that, well, we can always use Booker to run the Point.
(B) McD's years of experience coming up through the ranks resulted in the unhappy overabundance of Point Guards. Related experience helps success but, as we are seeing, it doesn't guarantee it.

Please tell me how you consider those two points to be considered naive. Have you been pleased with either (extreme) Point Guard situation? Both of them fall on the inexperienced GM.

There is a large range between complex and naive. I would like to see a sound fundamental NBA basketball team for a change.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,490
Reaction score
9,704
Location
L.A. area
Its really funny when a poster on a message board calls a guy like McD with years of experience coming up through the ranks naive. Its really a...well...naive comment.

How do you figure? Do I need to be a good free-throw shooter to be able to say that, relative to his peers, DeAndre Jordan sucks at free-throw shooting?
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
How do you figure? Do I need to be a good free-throw shooter to be able to say that, relative to his peers, DeAndre Jordan sucks at free-throw shooting?
Naive was the word used. DJ might be a bad free throw shooter, but I would not call him inexperienced or naive.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,490
Reaction score
9,704
Location
L.A. area
Naive was the word used. DJ might be a bad free throw shooter, but I would not call him inexperienced or naive.

The significance of the split hair eludes me. Would it be better to say, "McDonough makes a lot of mistakes that are consistent with naivete"?
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,437
Reaction score
68,639
Naive was the word used. DJ might be a bad free throw shooter, but I would not call him inexperienced or naive.

The idea that experience in any walk of life automatically negates naïveté is laughable.

Based on that standard, Rod Graves’ incredibly ******* should have Never been questioned when he was running the Cardinals further into the ground... you know... cuz of experience.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,029
Reaction score
58,329
And the reasonable answer, as with most things in life, is neither extreme.

A well run Front Office would find the balance.

I think you are right BC. The Suns best hope is a well run front office.
 

BC867

Long time Phoenician!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
17,827
Reaction score
1,709
Location
NE Phoenix
Sounds like the force.
:jedi:
LOL, poker. The Force is fantasy. Needing a well run Front Office is reality.

Maybe you've put your finger on it. The approach of our Front Office is little more than, "Use the Force." Perhaps the Suns should enlist Inspector Clouseau to take over from the foam finger. :)
 

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,313
Reaction score
11,387
It would be utter lunacy to view the youngest team in the NBA pushing .500 as some sort of wasted season.

That said... I don't want to use assets to bring in a competent PG right now. If we actually get to .500 and the playoffs seem like more than a pipe dream, do it then, but we shouldn't use up value to get a stop gap PG in a season that is developmental.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
The idea that experience in any walk of life automatically negates naïveté is laughable.

Based on that standard, Rod Graves’ incredibly ******* should have Never been questioned when he was running the Cardinals further into the ground... you know... cuz of experience.
Ok one last try. There is a difference between being wrong or bad at your job and being naive. Naive means being inexperienced or having a lack of knowledge. GM's can be bad because they take too many risks, are bad communicators, refuse to take risks, are cheap, have too much of an ego, and many more--all having nothing to do with being naive. OK. I am sure it will not convince anyone. Feel free to ignore this post if you like. Now its out of my system.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
It would be utter lunacy to view the youngest team in the NBA pushing .500 as some sort of wasted season.

That said... I don't want to use assets to bring in a competent PG right now. If we actually get to .500 and the playoffs seem like more than a pipe dream, do it then, but we shouldn't use up value to get a stop gap PG in a season that is developmental.
I agree with this. I don't see a deal out there that will help. It will just be more of the same. Booker is probably going to be happiest playing next to his buddy Tyler Ulis for now.
 

pokerface

ASFN Addict
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
5,369
Reaction score
807
LOL, poker. The Force is fantasy. Needing a well run Front Office is reality.

Maybe you've put your finger on it. The approach of our Front Office is little more than, "Use the Force." Perhaps the Suns should enlist Inspector Clouseau to take over from the foam finger. :)

What is the front office supposed to be doing? Be specific.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,710
Posts
5,410,881
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top