Good grief. He only spent a short time at pg and that was at the end of the game. He struggled as much at SG as PG in this game. I guarantee you Booker wants the ball in his hands as much as possible. He was double teamed the entire game. So he passed more and effectively.
Its really funny when a poster on a message board calls a guy like McD with years of experience coming up through the ranks naive. Its really a...well...naive comment.
(A) We do not have a starting calibre Point Guard on the roster. (B) This, following the other extreme -- the earlier experiment of three starting Point Guards, and tweeners at that.
(A) It would be dangerous to lull everyone into the false security that, well, we can always use Booker to run the Point.
(B) McD's years of experience coming up through the ranks resulted in the unhappy overabundance of Point Guards. Related experience helps success but, as we are seeing, it doesn't guarantee it.
Please tell me how you consider those two points to be considered naive. Have you been pleased with either (extreme) Point Guard situation? Both of them fall on the inexperienced GM.
There is a large range between complex and naive. I would like to see a sound fundamental NBA basketball team for a change.