The comment was less about the players and more about the willingness to move off the perceived top player at the position group.
Although I cringe at the time I tend to agree with moving off the perceived top end talent in most cases.
Nearly every draft we see guys who were thought to be the best at their position while some third rounder or guy drafted at 28 has a HoF type early career.
Tons of grading scales, dozens of metrics, and thousands of evaluators....and we still ain't privvy to conversations behind closed doors.
Often enough I think those "best at their position" guys go from a college system that let them flourish or even freelance to trying to play within the confines of a controlled pro system and their traits just don't fit.
So, getting a guy in the third that should fir your system can be a better move than getting a top 10 guy that just doesn't. Athleticism is great but it only goes so far.