And we can't score at the end of the game
What a joke
What a joke
I think he wa being facetious.So you assume you're going to give up a FG?
I want to see them every year from now on, if we can't beat them you know the team is just a pretender, don't waste time on it.I don’t want to see the Lions or the Panthers for five years. We just can’t beat them
I think it's because he is Colt McCoyNot to be an A$$, but when Kyler had such a bad first half, why not bring in Colt McCoy?
Dude... y’all are getting lumps of coal in your stockings this Xmas.
Probably Covid too if you go to that game. I’d suggest at least masking up to go sit with thousands of others with Onicron likely running wild by next week.
Ouch, but trueThis game was right outta the wilks era
I don’t think so. Hence the recliner comment.I think he wa being facetious.
Dude we are 3-4 in our last 7. We are a mediocre team right now. 1-2 in kylers last 3 games.What’s sad and only the Cardinals can do this. The media and everyone will blast us for being pretenders and a farce. So being 10-4 where no one thought that would be the case we will
Be treated as if we are 4-10. Only the Cardinals can do that. What a fn joke!!!
We are still 10-4. How doesn’t matter my point is. No one here predicted 10-4. But we willD
Dude we are 3-4 in our last 7. We are a mediocre team right now. 1-2 in kylers last 3 games.
When you have to kick multiple onside kicks, is it more likely that you're going to recover them both OR that you can get 2pt conversions, recover 1, and give up a FG on the other? I don't know the statistics for sure, but I'd bet on the latter.So you assume you're going to give up a FG?
Good thing Kyler or Kingsbury don’t get to fly the plane
Kyler would be alright, he’d keep it sailing high
Lol... no.When you have to kick multiple onside kicks, is it more likely that you're going to recover them both OR that you can get 2pt conversions, recover 1, and give up a FG on the other? I don't know the statistics for sure, but I'd bet on the latter.
It doesn't bother me that people didn't see the obscure scenario AZ was accounting for.....it's the arrogance in ignorance. (ie. Dunning-Kruger Effect) Disagree with the decision, fine, but the coaching staff isn't stupid for accounting for a scenario no one here was considering.
When you have to kick multiple onside kicks, is it more likely that you're going to recover them both OR that you can get 2pt conversions, recover 1, and give up a FG on the other? I don't know the statistics for sure, but I'd bet on the latter.
It doesn't bother me that people didn't see the obscure scenario AZ was accounting for.....it's the arrogance in ignorance. (ie. Dunning-Kruger Effect) Disagree with the decision, fine, but the coaching staff isn't stupid for accounting for a scenario no one here was considering.
The prbloem with that logic is if that’s what you’re trying to account for by going for 2 you’re making tying a two score game more difficult in order to account for the fact that it may become a 3 score game, which is really nigh unwinnable. So you play for the unwinnable scenario and in so doing make the slightly more winnable scenario more difficult? That’s some faulty logic.When you have to kick multiple onside kicks, is it more likely that you're going to recover them both OR that you can get 2pt conversions, recover 1, and give up a FG on the other? I don't know the statistics for sure, but I'd bet on the latter.
It doesn't bother me that people didn't see the obscure scenario AZ was accounting for.....it's the arrogance in ignorance. (ie. Dunning-Kruger Effect) Disagree with the decision, fine, but the coaching staff isn't stupid for accounting for a scenario no one here was considering.
The prbloem with that logic is if that’s what you’re trying to account for by going for 2 you’re making tying a two score game more difficult in order to account for the fact that it may become a 3 score game, which is really nigh unwinnable. So you play for the unwinnable scenario and in so doing make the slightly more winnable scenario more difficult? That’s some faulty logic.