Carson Palmer is Carson Palmer

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,550
Reaction score
57,907
Location
SoCal
It's pretty simple, Carson is Carson. Carson was never a great QB in the past. He was an average QB who became a journeyman. We were spoiled by warner thinking lightning could strike twice. But there's a big difference. Warner was a stud at one point and he resurrected his career with us. Palmer was never a stud. And a little bit of sunshine made us all believe we had warner again. Even when he was undefeated last year it was against the weak Marys of the league. He's soft. Charmin Palmer.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,138
Reaction score
8,044
Location
Scottsdale
It's pretty simple, Carson is Carson. Carson was never a great QB in the past. He was an average QB who became a journeyman. We were spoiled by warner thinking lightning could strike twice. But there's a big difference. Warner was a stud at one point and he resurrected his career with us. Palmer was never a stud. And a little bit of sunshine made us all believe we had warner again. Even when he was undefeated last year it was against the weak Marys of the league. He's soft. Charmin Palmer.

He's not Warner... And he is most definitely NOT soft. He's as tough as they come and frankly, I believe he's tougher than Warner.
But, he's just not at talented as Kurt. Kurt had the "it" factor. Carson has the "almost"...
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,437
Reaction score
18,325
Location
The Giant Toaster
Quarterbacks don't often change. Palmer will always put up numbers but display highly questionable judgment at the same time. It could be worse though, a lot worse.
 
OP
OP
Ouchie-Z-Clown

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,550
Reaction score
57,907
Location
SoCal
He's not Warner... And he is most definitely NOT soft. He's as tough as they come and frankly, I believe he's tougher than Warner.
But, he's just not at talented as Kurt. Kurt had the "it" factor. Carson has the "almost"...

Not mentally toughis what I meant. He gets soft in the head when chips are on the line. Throwing the int into double coverage isn't a talent thing, it's not being mentally tough.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,138
Reaction score
8,044
Location
Scottsdale
Not mentally toughis what I meant. He gets soft in the head when chips are on the line. Throwing the int into double coverage isn't a talent thing, it's not being mentally tough.

Hard to argue with that... Can't wait t hear what he has to say about that play. I mean, Mitchell never moved. He was there pre-snap and stayed there! WTH did Palmer see???
 

Shaggy

Site Owner Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Posts
9,048
Reaction score
2,989
Location
Arizona
It's all mental for Palmer. When something gets him spooked or he just makes several mistakes, he can never recover.
 

eastcoastSUN

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Posts
1,040
Reaction score
638
Location
858 via 703
Palmer can look good in stretches but if it ever came down to a potential game winning drive in the playoffs, I have absolutely no faith that he could convincingly lead us down the field without making a boneheaded decision. He gets rattled easily if the opposing team has any semblance of a pass rush. The Rams and Steelers games are proof of that.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
91,360
Reaction score
68,439
He's a good QB, but he ain't close to
Elite and never has been. That's the reality of what we're seeing. He's got to make a play in ONE of the two close games we've played so far and when the chips were down both times, he folded twice.
 

187

BIRDGANG
Joined
Apr 29, 2009
Posts
2,020
Reaction score
63
Location
Glendale, AZ
Stupid decisions in crunch time has always been his MO. He threw into double coverage to John a few times and it finally bit him. If you're gonna try and force something please do it to Floyd or Fitz, brown isn't big enough to consistently make a play in traffic.
 

Jersey Girl

Stand down
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2002
Posts
32,476
Reaction score
6,460
Location
Super Scottsdale
Trying to force things when the team is down is definitely a problem. I love that he wants to make something happen; but, man, you can't make poor decisions. Throwing into double coverage is a poor decision.
 

Dayman

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Posts
6,104
Reaction score
7,918
Location
Portland, Oregon
Once again, he had Fitz underneath for a shorter gain. And once again, he went for the lower percentage pass and failed. It's extremely frustrating.
 

BullheadCardFan

Go for it
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Posts
63,126
Reaction score
28,349
Location
Bullhead City, AZ
Once again, he had Fitz underneath for a shorter gain. And once again, he went for the lower percentage pass and failed. It's extremely frustrating.
Larry was open for sure. He wants to hit the big play and when we just need a first he has to check down on the deep play with the double coverage and go to the short guy.
 

NavyVet

Registered
Joined
Sep 15, 2003
Posts
519
Reaction score
0
Harry was right. Carson was going first read, outcome be damned the entire game. Did he have a pre-game, golf induced concussion?
 

Dr. Jones

Has No Time For Love
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Posts
27,326
Reaction score
16,222
Once again, he had Fitz underneath for a shorter gain. And once again, he went for the lower percentage pass and failed. It's extremely frustrating.

I was saying this earlier...... We had a sure 1st down to Fitz and he chose Smokey in double coverage deep. I don't understand that thinking. Shots are fine. Gotta play the percentages in that spot though.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,329
Palmer had an uneven day and made that horrible throw for the INT. He is a VERY Good QB bordering on Great.

Floyd just needs to drag his toe quicker and it's a different game IMO.

Very disappointed in the team for this crappy loss but I'm not jumping off the wagon.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,437
Reaction score
18,325
Location
The Giant Toaster
I was saying this earlier...... We had a sure 1st down to Fitz and he chose Smokey in double coverage deep. I don't understand that thinking. Shots are fine. Gotta play the percentages in that spot though.

Teams kill themselves every week by taking shots. With Chris Johnson and Andre Ellington there's no excuse for not running more screens.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
87,637
Reaction score
38,894
He had a bizarre game, lots of yards but didn't play well at all.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,733
Reaction score
24,303
Location
Killjoy Central
It's pretty simple, Carson is Carson. Carson was never a great QB in the past. He was an average QB who became a journeyman. We were spoiled by warner thinking lightning could strike twice. But there's a big difference. Warner was a stud at one point and he resurrected his career with us. Palmer was never a stud. And a little bit of sunshine made us all believe we had warner again. Even when he was undefeated last year it was against the weak Marys of the league. He's soft. Charmin Palmer.
Warner was not perfect. I would put Carson right up there with him.

Go back and watch some film. Warner made mistakes and cost us games too. He fumbled in the end zone in OT to give the Niners a win over us at UOP. He tossed a game changing pick six in a goal line situation in Tampa for Pete's sake. Plenty more examples. Some people tend to look back on him as if he walked on water. Simply not true.
 

SoCal Cardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 11, 2004
Posts
6,056
Reaction score
1,296
If you're gonna throw it into double coverage in the end zone, at least target Fitz ffs!!!
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,437
Reaction score
18,325
Location
The Giant Toaster
Warner was not perfect. I would put Carson right up there with him.

Go back and watch some film. Warner made mistakes and cost us games too. He fumbled in the end zone in OT to give the Niners a win over us at UOP. He tossed a game changing pick six in a goal line situation in Tampa for Pete's sake. Plenty more examples. Some people tend to look back on him as if he walked on water. Simply not true.

Didn't he throw 5 picks vs Carolina one year?
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,060
Reaction score
13,827
Quarterbacks don't often change. Palmer will always put up numbers but display highly questionable judgment at the same time. It could be worse though, a lot worse.

Lol yes... Yes it could. Ryan Lindley anybody?

He's not average he's a very good NFL quarterback is he elite no but he's def not average
 

Joe Mama

Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
9,501
Reaction score
964
Location
Gilbert, AZ
I was saying this earlier...... We had a sure 1st down to Fitz and he chose Smokey in double coverage deep. I don't understand that thinking. Shots are fine. Gotta play the percentages in that spot though.

I would need to go back and watch that again, but I thought Fitzgerald was pretty well covered until the ball was on its way to Brown and Fitzgerald was pretty far off to the other side of the field. That said, Fitzgerald would have still been a much better choice than throwing the game away. That was just an awful decision by a veteran who should know better.

Warner was not perfect. I would put Carson right up there with him.

Go back and watch some film. Warner made mistakes and cost us games too. He fumbled in the end zone in OT to give the Niners a win over us at UOP. He tossed a game changing pick six in a goal line situation in Tampa for Pete's sake. Plenty more examples. Some people tend to look back on him as if he walked on water. Simply not true.

I agree to a point. I know he is a holy roller, but Warner did not walk on water the way some people remember here. My guess is we could go back and find just as many of the same types of complaints about him that we are seeing about Palmer. The only difference is Palmer is playing behind a much better O-line with a better running game and more weapons.

Joe
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,733
Reaction score
24,303
Location
Killjoy Central
I would need to go back and watch that again, but I thought Fitzgerald was pretty well covered until the ball was on its way to Brown and Fitzgerald was pretty far off to the other side of the field. That said, Fitzgerald would have still been a much better choice than throwing the game away. That was just an awful decision by a veteran who should know better.

Yeah, the announcers even commented that #21 was staying right with Fitz. Still - Fitz in single coverage vs. John Brown in double coverage? I'd prefer a toss to Fitz in that situation.
 

Arizona's Finest

Your My Favorite Mistake
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Posts
9,709
Reaction score
1
I totally disagree with this premise.

Palmer WAS elite. Go look it up. His 2005 and 2006 seasons were the best in the league and he led the league in TDs. Name me last guy to start for the Pro Bowl team and lead the league in TDs that wasnt elite. Thanks for playing.

Also people have SUCH selective memory on ****. Do you remember the Kurt Warner the Cardinals brought in way back when? Do you remember the Kurt Warner that played here his first two years? Again go get k9 to sit on the metrics for you. His TO % was horrible and maybe worst in the league.

He got it coached out of him and became an expert in the offense. Hence 2008 and 2009. Same thing is/was happening with Palmer. Compare his INT % last two years with his 5 years prior (Much like Warner with Giants and last 2 years on Rams when he was basically given away so they could start Marc Bulger. Yes Marc Bulger)

Honestly I called 4-0 and I am damn pissed about yesterdays game. We can rationalize all we want but they should have won despite the officiating and Landry Jones not being practiced for. I HATE Mike Tomlin and he did it to us again. Yes there were some bad signs from the game, most of them in the first half when we should have put out foot on their throats and been up 21+

But that doesnt turn Palmer into a pumpkin or mean we are cheering for a non contender. Frankly coming here pisses me off to read how reactionary and silly the mindset I read here week to week. Try and take a step back and breath. What you saw in totality is more important then what you saw last week even though its the most recent information.

And everyone is going to be falling over themselves when this team is in the NFC Championship about "how it all came together" and "how this or this happened"..... nah you are all wrong. The evidence has been there from the beginning ya'll just decided to flip out and throw away the season after Week 6. And yes saying our top rated QB whom has 14 TDs and 5 INTS is medicore is a total extreme hot take at its worst. I mean did I seriously see someone start a thread called its all over? LOL our biggest comp is Seattle and they are way more screwed. At this point we have the division sown up.

Jesus ESPN and Social Media is ruining everyones brains. We dont need a bunch of hot takes. Be measured. Know what you are seeing. And quit generalizing and being the first with an opinion.

In finality no I dont think Palmer is a falling a part. This wasnt happening last year. Ill give it more time before making an full read on this topic. Theres been a lot more good then bad, yesterdays game non withstanding where he was definitely off all game.

We do need to beat a good team. Looks like we wont have that shot until at Seattle or Cinncy at home. Until then we can calm down on the Super Bowl favorite talk. But dismissing it out of hand because of a couple disappointing losses is stupid too.

Im taking a break. See ya on the flip side.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,568
Posts
5,408,417
Members
6,318
Latest member
gayla
Top