duckfallas
All Star
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2005
- Posts
- 669
- Reaction score
- 0
Makes no sense. Why would the Vikes trade a proven vet like Culpepper for the unproven, and equally expensive, Phillip Rivers. That would be stupid.
The only thing I can figure is green's success he had with Culpepper as an incentive to get Daunte?vince56 said:What does that say? We pick up scraps while another team gets a young 1st round QB? Maybe we should skip the middleman and trade our 1st for Rivers.
Supposedly Daunte's upcoming salary makes him expendable. That's what I read. It didn't make sense to me either. Except the owner is supposedly tired of all the negative press from the players.duckfallas said:Makes no sense. Why would the Vikes trade a proven vet like Culpepper for the unproven, and equally expensive, Phillip Rivers. That would be stupid.
Why? Because trades never happen in the NFL?Shane H said:This is never going to happen.
Pariah said:Why? Because trades never happen in the NFL?
I was being sarcastic. I think we can put that myth to bed after the last couple of years in the NFL--it's been pretty busy with trades...and big ones.Shane H said:Thats one reason.
Actually, it's based on a Morten Anderson source. Mort is pretty connected, and right more than he is wrong.This all based on pure BS. All because Denny drafted the guy and nothing more.
Again, what are they?Theres a plethura of reason this wont happen.
duckfallas said:Makes no sense. Why would the Vikes trade a proven vet like Culpepper for the unproven, and equally expensive, Phillip Rivers. That would be stupid.
I think you're off-base on what it would take to get Culpepper. One 2nd rounder and McCown should do it.en fuego said:Lastly, the Cards would have to give up AT LEAST two first round picks and throw in a player or two (of which, one will be painful to see go).
en fuego said:While not up totally up to speed on the cap ramifications, the trade could happen--
First--Why would Minn do it?
The overriding factor would have to be non -football. You dont get rid of a very high performance QB in the prime of his career, no matter what the trade value is.
Maybe Culpepper had a bigger than disclosed role in the "love boat" incident, and Ziggy Wilf, the new owner has decided that heads must roll.
Second, both parties would have to have the cap space to make it work-- and both do. The Vikes could absorb the bonus acceleration while the Cards have the space to pay his large salary.
Lastly, the Cards would have to give up AT LEAST two first round picks and throw in a player or two (of which, one will be painful to see go).
While the "lets trade for Culpepper, he is wayyyyyyyy better than Josh" talk is fun, the question is are you ready to trade two first round picks and one of: Darnell Dockett, Adrian Wilson or Karlos Dansby? Because something like that is what it is going to take.
I wasn't. Moss is arguably the best WR ever to play the game. Culpepper is a good QB. Moss will natuarally have a higher price tag.en fuego said:the Vikes were super motivated to get rid of Randy Moss -- and the price was a high first and a starting defensive player. I think the price for a QB is way higher, AND, you dont think the Ravens, et al will also be bidding for Culpepper.
I hope you were being sarcastic.
Pariah said:I was being sarcastic. I think we can put that myth to bed after the last couple of years in the NFL--it's been pretty busy with trades...and big ones.
Actually, it's based on a Morten Anderson source. Mort is pretty connected, and right more than he is wrong.
Again, what are they?
Shane H said:To much cap hit to absorb etc....
1. Cap implications
Pariah said:I wasn't. Moss is arguably the best WR ever to play the game. Culpepper is a good QB. Moss will natuarally have a higher price tag.
Shane H said:3. Other teams gettiing in the sweepstakes and offering a better deal to the Vikes. Im sure there are more teams with way more to offer.
4. No concrete evidence the Cards are even interested(which I highly doubt) It is all pure conjecture.
CardinalChris said:Are we serious? Culpepper is better than any QB who has sniffed a Cardinal Uniform in a LONG time. I know, he is playing badly. Let's see, they have no running game, a bad line who lost one starter and lost their best one to injury, and traded away their best WR. He'd be an upgrade for sure.
However, it will never happen
clif said:Culpepper in cardinal red would be a dream come true! How can anyone pass that up??
If True
wembley88 said:So lets bring him in because we have a bad line, no running game.....
joeshmo said:Now I am not debating the merits of the rumor but rather the perimeters of the trade itself.
Just to give a little better prespective. Right now we are projected to be picking #12 in the draft. That means not Leinart, no Bush, no Ferguson, no AJ Hawk. So does trading away the #12 pick + player (Pace, BJ, Wells, Leckey, Ross, ect), change anyones mind one way or the other.