Defensive snap counts

vince56

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
9,081
Reaction score
2,305
Location
Arizona
Reference: https://cardswire.usatoday.com/2018/10/20/az-arizona-cardinals-week-7-defensive-snap-counts/

So let's get this right, we had 59 snaps on defense the other night. Breaking down LBs and DBs:

  • Linebackers: Josh Bynes, 59; Haason Reddick, 59; Deone Bucannon, 7; Gerald Hodges, 1
  • Defensive backs: Antoine Bethea, 59; Patrick Peterson, 58; Bené Benwikere, 58; Budda Baker, 58; Rudy Ford, 52; Jamar Taylor, 1
I count 2 LBs with 100% playtime. I count 4 DBs with 58 or 59 plays, and Rudy Ford (??!) had 52.

This has been getting to me all year but I haven't cared enough to buy the game films package. Are we running the same play, every play? We're basically running the same formation. That's 99% nickel. No added LBs, no added DBs. Did we even have a goal-line sub in D-lineman? Something about the vanilla-ness of this defense is just gnawing away at the back of my mind every time I watch them play and I'm starting to think this is it. Maybe it's just me, it doesn't seem like a system. Please someone tell me I'm wrong here.
 

AZ Shocker

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Posts
1,271
Reaction score
71
Location
E. Valley
It certainly looks like a bad system. Something I haven't seen since the 1980's and a few bad teams sticking with it in the early 90's. I kinda dont know what Bidwill was thinking in hiring Wilks.
 

ReasonableMan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Posts
1,283
Reaction score
1,028
Location
Arizona
Certainly appears so. I haven’t watched closely enough to make that determination, but I am now. If it continues I’d imagine things will get ugly.
 

cardpa

Have a Nice Day!
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
7,405
Reaction score
4,151
Location
Monroe NC
Let me get this right so I don't misunderstand, the base defense is a 4-3 yet they only played 8 snaps out of 59 in the base defense. Maybe Wilks should be given a hint as to maybe that's why teams are able to run all over the defense. For a guy who was supposed to be a defensive guru, he leaves a lot to be desired.
 

Hoodhero

Hall of Famer
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Posts
1,865
Reaction score
3,569
Location
Canada
I guess this is what happens when your HC is just a DB coach with bravado that lucked into promotion smh
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,799
Reaction score
25,774
Location
Orlando, FL
I’m surprised we didn’t see the Single Wing during McCoy’s Nostalgia Tour. I know you’re talking defense, but everything’s old.
 

DeAnna

Just A Face in The Crowd
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Posts
7,282
Reaction score
760
Location
Goodyear, AZ
It's been talked about on radio ... he plays a 4-2-5 which is usually nickel defense most of the time. No wonder they get killed in the run game, lol

Earlier this year, our own Alex Rubenstein pointed out that the Cardinals never break out of nickel defense. Never ever.

In a 34-0 loss to the Rams in Week 2, the Cardinals had five defensive backs on the field for all 72 defensive snaps. Not even on a fourth-and-goal from the 1-yard line did the Cardinals think ‘Hmm ... an extra defensive lineman instead of another 200-pound DB would probably be a good idea here.’

While it hasn’t quite been five defensive backs playing 100 percent of the snaps in every game since that Week 2 blowout, the problem hasn’t gone away. The Cardinals still stubbornly refuse to have any more than six defensive lineman and linebackers on the field.
 
Last edited:

ReasonableMan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Posts
1,283
Reaction score
1,028
Location
Arizona
It's been talked about on radio ... he plays a 5-2 which is usually nickel defense most of the time. No wonder they get killed in the run game, lol
It’s kinda crazy but Wilks defense is built on anticipating the pass and bending to the run, because this is a passing league, yet he builds his offense on the opposite premise.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,060
Reaction score
13,827
The thing that's been going on with the offense same stuborn no adjustments BS has been going on with the Defense.

You have to match up and get creative and this coaching staff thinks it's 1992.
 

wit3card

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 29, 2016
Posts
2,948
Reaction score
1,782
It's about 90% of the time that we play 4-2-5 and clearly he thought he could get away with it, but Bucannon&Reddick can't play in this D as run stopping LB ... I think only a handful of LB could play this situation hence, I only can think of Luke K. of the Panthers to play in such a D.

And don't get me wrong, we were a 3-4 D and played many 3-3-5 or 2-4-5 packages under Bettcher/Bowles but, with 3 or 4 ILB you have a chance to stop the run and even than we sometimes had problems when they catched us off guard.

So this D concept is bad, it's really bad, because we can't stop the pass because of a soft zone system and we can't stop the run.

with a 4-3 with man I would see much more chance but ... yeah ... this system isn't build to win, and not build for our players
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,600
Posts
5,408,568
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top