Does Keim Have The Guts to Trade Up In the First Round?

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,281
Reaction score
6,227
Location
Dallas, TX
If Mayfield’s sitting there at 6 would you swap firsts plus give up 2 more firsts and 2 seconds?

I don’t think that’s how much it will take. I’m think more along swapping picks, plus next years 1 & two 2’s. Now does Indy want to trade again? Hmmm

More than likely Big Red is drafting even higher in 2019, which if I’m Keim I’m selling that to Indy.

Imo Harry this is the draft to make the move because I think 3 of the top 5 will be pretty good NFL QBs. Which ones is the million $ question. If I were a betting man it’s Mayfield, Rosen & Darnold.

Thoughts Harry?
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Half the board is in favor of trading up to top 5 by giving up two 1's and 3 2's right now.

You are too hung up on the moving up one spot - the issue is did you get your qb or not and was it worth it.

2 1's for Mahomes or Watson is better than 2 1's and 3 2's for Mayfield. That is my point.
Your point is missing that we had a coach on his last year, in a situation where our GM had his future in question.

The trade will not be worth it. It hasn't ever been. Teams don't let go of franchise, Super Bowl winning QBs.

I don’t think you’re in the minority, I think you’re completely alone.
You're more than welcome to go look at last year's draft threads. The entire board was full of "Don't draft a QB now" people. "Wait until next year, the QBs will be better" people. If you think any different, you weren't posting then.

There’s no such thing as overpaying if you think you have the next Wilson/Wentz.
Wentz is not a Super Bowl winning QB.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Wilson was an undersized, complete anomaly of a pick. Yes, you want him, but the Seahawks didn't trade into the top pick to draft him.

There is an insane premium to trade up for these guys, especially this year! I'm having a mental breakdown. I almost want us to trade up and watch the guy fail, so I can repost all of this from the asylum.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,467
Reaction score
18,375
Location
The Giant Toaster
Your point is missing that we had a coach on his last year, in a situation where our GM had his future in question.

The trade will not be worth it. It hasn't ever been. Teams don't let go of franchise, Super Bowl winning QBs.


You're more than welcome to go look at last year's draft threads. The entire board was full of "Don't draft a QB now" people. "Wait until next year, the QBs will be better" people. If you think any different, you weren't posting then.


Wentz is not a Super Bowl winning QB.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Wilson was an undersized, complete anomaly of a pick. Yes, you want him, but the Seahawks didn't trade into the top pick to draft him.

There is an insane premium to trade up for these guys, especially this year! I'm having a mental breakdown. I almost want us to trade up and watch the guy fail, so I can repost all of this from the asylum.

Why does it matter that Wentz hasn’t won a SB at 24 years old? He’s a franchise QB and MVP candidate? Which one of us is taking the crazy pills?
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,281
Reaction score
6,227
Location
Dallas, TX
Why does it matter that Wentz hasn’t won a SB at 24 years old? He’s a franchise QB and MVP candidate? Which one of us is taking the crazy pills?
Yeah it’s pure lunacy to think the Iggles won the SB simply because Wentz (who had them off to the NFC best record) tore up his knee & the great savior Foles was the single reason they’re champs lol

Ridiculous comments from Solar. I’m going to laugh once a couple of these 1st round QBs are very good players & possibly lead their teams to potential Titles especially if we don’t grab one of them
 
Last edited:

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,020
Reaction score
2,869
Location
Denmark
The trade will not be worth it. It hasn't ever been. Teams don't let go of franchise, Super Bowl winning QBs.

We have been through this thoroughly, Solar, so this is not to start a new debate. I just want to say that
I have never seen a Super Bowl winning draft prospect, and a team will never experience having one in the wings if they never take a risk.

You're more than welcome to go look at last year's draft threads. The entire board was full of "Don't draft a QB now" people. "Wait until next year, the QBs will be better" people. If you think any different, you weren't posting then.

The notion that next year’s class is better is, to me, kind of the way you lose or at least stays mediocre. You can always say it, and by doing so you never gets a good quarterback.

I am not saying that it was your stand, by the way. I don’t know if it was.
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,477
Reaction score
16,650
Location
San Antonio, Texas
The proven percentages are that trading up is an astronomical failure for every single team in the past 20 years. With maybe two exceptions. Goff and Wentz. Maybe. We'll see what happens.

So what you are saying is that the very act of trading up for a QB, somehow magically saps any talent the targeted QB has. That if Montana, Brady, Peyton Manning or a slew of other great QBs would have been a party to such a trade, they would have lost their ability to succeed. Forget that past QBs involved in such trades where poorly judged by bad front offices with bad teams or that finding a QB is hard to begin with, regardless of how they are acquired in the draft. You are talking about some kind of voodoo hoodoo phenomenon that the trade up enacts. That's fine, but it's right up there with the Pottsville Curse. Your observation is based on some unknown metaphysical transformation with the trade up being like a ritualistic intonation. Again, that's fine but please do not proceed to entertain that thought with stats and disguise the results are based on logic opposed to magic
 

HoodieBets

Formerly azcardsfan1616
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,741
Reaction score
1,036
Location
Rhode Island
We have been through this thoroughly, Solar, so this is not to start a new debate. I just want to say that
I have never seen a Super Bowl winning draft prospect, and a team will never experience having one in the wings if they never take a risk.



The notion that next year’s class is better is, to me, kind of the way you lose or at least stays mediocre. You can always say it, and by doing so you never gets a good quarterback.

I am not saying that it was your stand, by the way. I don’t know if it was.
Next years class is not good at all in the QB department.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

HoodieBets

Formerly azcardsfan1616
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,741
Reaction score
1,036
Location
Rhode Island
I am sorry, but that is just a guess. None of us has any idea.

Eh you know if there’s a stud waiting to come out like Luck or Manning was. QB will not be the #1 pick of the draft next year unless someone unexpected has a phenom type year.

EDIT: I’m going off the premise that Shea Patterson won’t gain eligibility for this year. If he does he will be the only QB in the top 10.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,188
Reaction score
16,278
Location
Modesto, California
I am sorry, but that is just a guess. None of us has any idea.

sure we do. You meant to say that you personally have no idea.

If next years draft class was actually good, there would be people pumping it up right now. Just like they were pumping up Darnold and Rosen at this point last year... but instead, talk of next years draft QB's focuses on "might" "could" and "if"

there are a couple decent prospects... but not as many nor as high quality as are in this draft...
that "could" change..."if" a guy like Stidham comes out and shreds defenses for 75% completions, 3500 yds, and 30 TD's then the overall quality of next years draft "might" be comparable to this one.
 

HoodieBets

Formerly azcardsfan1616
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,741
Reaction score
1,036
Location
Rhode Island
sure we do. You meant to say that you personally have no idea.

If next years draft class was actually good, there would be people pumping it up right now. Just like they were pumping up Darnold and Rosen at this point last year... but instead, talk of next years draft QB's focuses on "might" "could" and "if"

there are a couple decent prospects... but not as many nor as high quality as are in this draft...
that "could" change..."if" a guy like Stidham comes out and shreds defenses for 75% completions, 3500 yds, and 30 TD's then the overall quality of next years draft "might" be comparable to this one.

Even if stidham tears it up there is still no guy you trade up to 1 to get. Theres not a franchise guy. I really like the top 3 QB prospects in 20 tho.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,020
Reaction score
2,869
Location
Denmark
Eh you know if there’s a stud waiting to come out like Luck or Manning was. QB will not be the #1 pick of the draft next year unless someone unexpected has a phenom type year.

Yes, but that was not what you wrote. You wrote that the quarterback class would not be good, so I answered about that. You mention the reason why none of us knows how good the class will be yourself. That is why it is a guess.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,020
Reaction score
2,869
Location
Denmark
sure we do. You meant to say that you personally have no idea.

Good one, but no. You don’t have any idea either. None of us have.

Well, if you know every quarterback, starting or non-starting last season, in the college ranks then you might have an idea, but even then, I doubt you are psychic. I can tell you that it happens every year that one or more quarterbacks, that few have ever heard of, performs very well and ends up as relatively high draft picks.

If next years draft class was actually good, there would be people pumping it up right now. Just like they were pumping up Darnold and Rosen at this point last year... but instead, talk of next years draft QB's focuses on "might" "could" and "if"

This is the mistake in your post, by the way. The draft class as we know it might not be that good. That is not at all to the the same as was alleged in the post above.
 

HoodieBets

Formerly azcardsfan1616
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
5,741
Reaction score
1,036
Location
Rhode Island
Good one, but no. You don’t have any idea either. None of us have.

Well, if you know every quarterback, starting or non-starting last season, in the college ranks then you might have an idea, but even then, I doubt you are psychic. I can tell you that it happens every year that one or more quarterbacks, that few have ever heard of, performs very well and ends up as relatively high draft picks.



This is the mistake in your post, by the way. The draft class as we know it might not be that good. That is not at all to the the same as was alleged in the post above.

So in your fantasy land we shouldn’t talk about prospects til next years college football season is close to over. People don’t jump from off draftboards to #1 overall based on a decent or above average year.

Everyone going into last year already knew Darnold Rosen Mayfield Allen and Jackson were the top 5 guys. Darnold had a crap season and his stock wasn’t effected at all. QB stock is already set years in advance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Veer

All Star
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Posts
863
Reaction score
890
So in your fantasy land we shouldn’t talk about prospects til next years college football season is close to over. People don’t jump from off draftboards to #1 overall based on a decent or above average year.

Everyone going into last year already knew Darnold Rosen Mayfield Allen and Jackson were the top 5 guys. Darnold had a crap season and his stock wasn’t effected at all. QB stock is already set years in advance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just not true. There are always some prospects touted as 1st round caliber who drop to the late rounds a year later, and some prospects rise from unknown to 1st round.

Darnold and Rosen are very unique, relatively sure prospects. Not quite as polished as Luck was, but good luck waiting on such a once in a generation prospect.

On the other hand, Lamar Jackson's ability to play QB in the NFL was put in question by some well-known scouts. Allen was just a guy from North Dakota in the mold of John Skelton a year ago. Mayfield was beat out by Pat Mahomes, too weak and too small anyway, and just another QB from a gimmick offense. None of those three was considered a 1st round pick all the way. Mahomes btw was never in consideration for 1st round during his days at Texas Tech, only after he declared and scouts found out about his amazing potential.

Keim really messed up last year's draft, where Watson and Mahomes were there for us and extremely cheap. This year he has to pay a steep price for it. And if he doesn't, get ready for yet another season of mediocrity or even worse.
 

Solar7

Go Suns
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
11,172
Reaction score
12,108
Location
Las Vegas, NV
We have been through this thoroughly, Solar, so this is not to start a new debate. I just want to say that
I have never seen a Super Bowl winning draft prospect, and a team will never experience having one in the wings if they never take a risk.



The notion that next year’s class is better is, to me, kind of the way you lose or at least stays mediocre. You can always say it, and by doing so you never gets a good quarterback.

I am not saying that it was your stand, by the way. I don’t know if it was.
Trust me, I wasn't saying "next year will be better" last year, nor am I saying it this year. However, this year, I believe that trading up is a desperation move we'll be making, and therefore will end up with the kind of poor production that desperate teams have. The "Levi Brown over Adrian Peterson" kind of move.

So what you are saying is that the very act of trading up for a QB, somehow magically saps any talent the targeted QB has. That if Montana, Brady, Peyton Manning or a slew of other great QBs would have been a party to such a trade, they would have lost their ability to succeed. Forget that past QBs involved in such trades where poorly judged by bad front offices with bad teams or that finding a QB is hard to begin with, regardless of how they are acquired in the draft. You are talking about some kind of voodoo hoodoo phenomenon that the trade up enacts. That's fine, but it's right up there with the Pottsville Curse. Your observation is based on some unknown metaphysical transformation with the trade up being like a ritualistic intonation. Again, that's fine but please do not proceed to entertain that thought with stats and disguise the results are based on logic opposed to magic

No, that's not what I'm saying at all. But successful QBs at the top of the draft aren't skipped over by teams. That's why there's a continuing issue with teams that trade up for a QB failing to succeed. It's that there are 32 other clubs, most of them jockeying for decent QB play, and there are very few instances where a guy that grades out well is going to come available.

Trading up is ignoring history and thinking we're going to be the special ones that get it right.
 

WisconsinCard

Herfin BIg Time
Joined
Apr 1, 2003
Posts
15,962
Reaction score
7,788
Location
In A Cigar Bar Near You
Keim really messed up last year's draft, where Watson and Mahomes were there for us and extremely cheap. This year he has to pay a steep price for it. And if he doesn't, get ready for yet another season of mediocrity or even worse.

Can I ask a question? Why so you think it would have been cheap to trade up last year? If you are offering a first and a second to move up 1, 2 or 3 picks, why would that team except that? They are getting offers of two first and a second to move back 8 to 10 spaces. Now if you're a GM which offer do you take?
 

GimmedaBall

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Posts
1,626
Reaction score
1,110
If SK was on this forum---which way do you think he would go in the debate regarding giving up multiple draft picks to move to the top of the draft?

Everything he has ever done as a GM and every thing he states in interviews since he became a GM indicates that he will not take that suicidal leap.

Can anyone point to a draft move or a single interview that says he will do that??? As Professor Google Search Engine, I am unable to find anything that points in that direction.

All of those who do want to trade up---face reality. Unless SK is tackled on the 50 yard line and suffers a concussion on his way to the Cardinal's draft war room, SK will behave the way he always has while running the draft. That includes sticking to his draft board and not trying to win the lottery.
 

Gandhi

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Posts
2,020
Reaction score
2,869
Location
Denmark
So in your fantasy land we shouldn’t talk about prospects til next years college football season is close to over. People don’t jump from off draftboards to #1 overall based on a decent or above average year.

What? Where in any of my posts have you read that we shouldn’t talk about next year’s draft? Also, while you are writing a post proving that you are not putting words in my mouth to suit your own point, can you please include where you have read anything from me about going from unknown to the #1 pick?

Everyone going into last year already knew Darnold Rosen Mayfield Allen and Jackson were the top 5 guys. Darnold had a crap season and his stock wasn’t effected at all. QB stock is already set years in advance.

I am sorry to say, but you are still wrong. I guess I need to prove it to you, so I can give you some examples. To fathom most of the draft community I will provide proof with both draft analyst and fans. Obviously, I don’t know if you are psychic, so I can only show you how the draft community in general works.

It goes both ways, you see, as you will find out when you have read this post.

In 2011 Blaine Gabbert was selected #10 overall, but it was not until the start of 2011 that he became a hot prospect. It’s hard to find rankings from that far back but if you click here you can see a mock draft that draft analyst Todd McShay published right after the 2010 draft. You will notice that he does not have Gabbert included in his first round. If you click here you can read an article from January 2011 from Football Outsiders where draft analysts’ Chad Reuter, Rob Rang and Bill Connelly talks about certain prospects. A direct quote from the article is that “it’s possibly that no player in this draft will benefit more from Luck’s decision [to stay in school] than Gabbert, who started to hit the radar when he declared for the NFL draft”. Here is another article where the author tries to narrow down when Gabbert started to rise up draft boards. It’s also quite enlightening to look at other mock drafts from after the 2010 draft but before or very shortly into 2011. You can do so by clicking here (two rounds), here or here. You will see that none of them includes Gabbert in the first round.

You will also notice that all of them, including McShay’s, has Ryan Mallett as a first round pick. Ryan Mallett was drafted in the third round.

In 2012 Ryan Tannehill was drafted #10 overall. You can click here to read a mock draft from NFL writer Peter Schrager posted right after the 2011 draft. As you can see he did not project Ryan Tannehill to be a first round pick. If you click here you can read a mock draft made by Todd McShay right after the 2011 draft. Again you will notice that he does not project Tannehill as a first round pick. Click here to read a mock draft by draft analyst Matt Miller that was made in August 2011. Again you will see that he did not consider Tannehill a first round pick. By clicking here, you can see some rankings from October 2011 where it says that Tannehill could be drafted between the second and the fifth round. By clicking here you will read an article on Tannehill’s rise up draft boards.

You will also see that all of the links include Landry Jones and Matt Barkley as projected first round picks. None of them entered the draft, and thus people’s guess on the quarterback draft class was wrong for that reason alone.

In 2013 E.J. Manuel was the lone quarterback selected in the first round at pick #16. You can click here to read some rankings from draft analyst Bucky Brooks posted in early January 2013. As you can see he has Manuel ranked as his #5 quarterback. Here are his rankings from early February, and once again he has Manuel ranked as his #5 quarterback prospect. Click here to see some rankings made by a fan in November 2012. You will notice that he has Manuel ranked as his #7 quarterback prospect. Here you can see quarterback rankings from another fan posted in January 2013. He ranks Manuel as his #9 quarterback prospect. Here is some quarterback rankings from July 2012 that does not even include Manuel.

You will undoubtedly notice that Matt Barkley, Landry Jones and Tyler Wilson are ranked ahead of Manuel in all the rankings. I can tell you that all three of them was drafted in the fourth round.

In 2014 Blake Bortles was selected as #3 overall. In September 2013 draft analyst Dan Kadar made a mock draft that you can see by clicking here. He did not project Bortles as a first round pick. Click here to see a mock draft by NFL writer Chris Burke published a few days after the 2013 draft. He did not include Bortles in his first round projection. Here you will see a mock draft from right after the 2013 draft that does not include Bortles in the first round. Here is a mock draft by draft analyst Eric Edholm from November 2013 where he does not project Bortles in his first round.

As you can see in most of the mock drafts they project Zach Mettenberger, Tahj Boyd and Brett Hundley to be first round picks. Mettenberger and Boyd was drafted in the sixth round, and Hundley did not even declare for the draft.

In regards to 2015 you can click here to see a mock draft by NFL writer Jason McIntyre from May 2014 where he projects Brett Hundley to be a first round pick. Click here to see a mock draft by draft analyst Matt Miller from May 2014 where he projects Hundley to be a first round pick. Here is a mock draft by a fan from July 2014 where Hundley is projected to be a first round pick. Here is a mock draft from December 2014 where Hundley is projected to be a first round pick. Click here to see a mock draft by draft analyst Dane Brugler from September 2014 where Hundley is projected to be a first round pick. Click here to see some quarterback rankings from January 2015 where Hundley is ranked as the #3 quarterback prospect.

Hundley was, in fact, not drafted in the top ten of the first round as most of the guys project. He was drafted in the fifth round.

In 2016 Carson Wentz was drafted second overall. Here is a mock draft by Matt Miller from May 2015 where Wentz is not included as a first round pick. Here is a mock draft from May 2015 where Wentz is not projected to be a first round pick. Here is a mock draft from July 2015 where Wentz is not projected to be a first round pick. Here is a mock draft from May 2015 where Wentz is not included in the first round. Here is a mock draft from August 2015 where Wentz is not projected to be a first round pick. Here is a compilation of rankings from draft analyst’s Todd McShay, Rob Rang, Charlie Campbell, Matt Miller and Ryan McCrystal from December 2015. None of them has Wentz in their top 32. Here is some quarterback rankings from October 2015 that does not have Wentz included in the top five. Here
is some quarterback rankings from May where Wentz is not included in the top five.

You will also see that all of the mock draft has Cardale Jones and Connor Cook projected to be selected in the first round, and most of them in the top ten. Both was drafted in the fourth round.

In 2017 Mitch Trubisky ended up as the #2 overall pick. Click here to see quarterback rankings in the NCAA from July 2017. Trubisky is not included in the top 35. Here is a mock draft from October 2016 where Trubisky is not projected to be a first round pick. Click here to read a mock draft by Todd McShay from May 2016 where Trubisky is not projected to be a first round pick. Click here to see a mock draft from Matt Miller from May 2016 where Trubisky is not included in the first round. Click here to see a mock draft from December 2016 where Trubisky is not projected to be a first round pick. Click here
to see a mock draft from October 2016 where Trubisky is not projected to be a first round pick.

You will also see that almost all those mock drafts have Brad Kaaya projected as a first round pick. Kaaya was drafted in the sixth round.

You can obviously find more examples, and you can make the exact same exercise with the second round if you like.

Every link I have shown you contains stuff that has been published after the draft one year and before the draft the following year, and thus gives a valid view into how the quarterback draft class in the following draft were perceived.

Now, it’s obviously subjective if you think a prospect has a phenom year, as you call it, but I think you will agree that it was not the case with almost all of the mentioned prospects.

We are all wrong sometimes, and I think that is perfectly fine, but you probably shouldn’t be so stubborn when you don’t know what you are talking about.
 
Last edited:

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,787
Reaction score
23,978
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
If SK was on this forum---which way do you think he would go in the debate regarding giving up multiple draft picks to move to the top of the draft?

Everything he has ever done as a GM and every thing he states in interviews since he became a GM indicates that he will not take that suicidal leap.

Can anyone point to a draft move or a single interview that says he will do that??? As Professor Google Search Engine, I am unable to find anything that points in that direction.

All of those who do want to trade up---face reality. Unless SK is tackled on the 50 yard line and suffers a concussion on his way to the Cardinal's draft war room, SK will behave the way he always has while running the draft. That includes sticking to his draft board and not trying to win the lottery.

He'd piss his pants at the thought of taking that kind of a risk. Problem is, he's good at the obvious moves and the basic, conservative type of moves and trades to build a team; he just doesn't have the "guts", to quote the thread, to make the hard decisions, to roll the dice when needed.

And nice try, trying to frame the argument to your POV. If anyone disagrees, it's a suicidal move, eh? Again, nice try ;)


Trust me, I wasn't saying "next year will be better" last year, nor am I saying it this year. However, this year, I believe that trading up is a desperation move we'll be making, and therefore will end up with the kind of poor production that desperate teams have. The "Levi Brown over Adrian Peterson" kind of move.



No, that's not what I'm saying at all. But successful QBs at the top of the draft aren't skipped over by teams. That's why there's a continuing issue with teams that trade up for a QB failing to succeed. It's that there are 32 other clubs, most of them jockeying for decent QB play, and there are very few instances where a guy that grades out well is going to come available.

Trading up is ignoring history and thinking we're going to be the special ones that get it right.

"You've forgotten about us, clearly."

Sincerely,

The Cleveland Browns
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
He'd piss his pants at the thought of taking that kind of a risk. Problem is, he's good at the obvious moves and the basic, conservative type of moves and trades to build a team; he just doesn't have the "guts", to quote the thread, to make the hard decisions, to roll the dice when needed.

And nice try, trying to frame the argument to your POV. If anyone disagrees, it's a suicidal move, eh? Again, nice try ;)




"You've forgotten about us, clearly."

Sincerely,

The Cleveland Browns


And if anyone disagrees with you it's "beyond a fatal flaw."

(Curious... What exactly is "beyond" fatal?) ;)
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Posts
10,455
Reaction score
7,413
Location
Chandler
He'd piss his pants at the thought of taking that kind of a risk. Problem is, he's good at the obvious moves and the basic, conservative type of moves and trades to build a team; he just doesn't have the "guts", to quote the thread, to make the hard decisions, to roll the dice when needed.

And nice try, trying to frame the argument to your POV. If anyone disagrees, it's a suicidal move, eh? Again, nice try ;)




"You've forgotten about us, clearly."

Sincerely,

The Cleveland Browns

In other words Keim isn't stupid.
 

GimmedaBall

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Posts
1,626
Reaction score
1,110
He'd piss his pants at the thought of taking that kind of a risk. Problem is, he's good at the obvious moves and the basic, conservative type of moves and trades to build a team; he just doesn't have the "guts", to quote the thread, to make the hard decisions, to roll the dice when needed.

And nice try, trying to frame the argument to your POV. If anyone disagrees, it's a suicidal move, eh? Again, nice try ;)




"You've forgotten about us, clearly."

Sincerely,

The Cleveland Browns

You don't have to agree with my POV to appreciate that trading a large number of picks for one player has had very little success, one that can set back a franchise for years and is suicidal. I presented the research and metrics on that move many times over (as has Solar7).

Here's SK discussing the issue on April 19, 2018:

http://www.espn.com/blog/nfcwest/po...r-not-to-trade-that-is-the-cardinals-question

His comments lead me to believe he will take the 'conservative' approach as you call it---I call it one based on logic and knowledge of the odds and outcomes possible.

"Are you willing to put the franchise in a position to be set back for years if you're not right?" Keim said. "It can be crippling for us if we traded the next couple drafts to get get a player that's never taken a snap and doesn't have success.

"There's a lot of moving parts to it but at the end of the day, we've got to do the best thing for the organization."

Perhaps the Cards see a QB in this draft that they rated as one willing to take the gamble and SK is joining the other GMs and blowing smoke to hide his true intentions??? Have you come across any SK comments that show even the slightest indication that he is game for such a huge trade?

It would be a major surprise, surprise, surprise if he makes that kind of trade move. I think we can both agree on that.
 

Stout

Hold onto the ball, Murray!
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Posts
39,787
Reaction score
23,978
Location
Pittsburgh, PA--Enemy territory!
You don't have to agree with my POV to appreciate that trading a large number of picks for one player has had very little success, one that can set back a franchise for years and is suicidal. I presented the research and metrics on that move many times over (as has Solar7).

Here's SK discussing the issue on April 19, 2018:

http://www.espn.com/blog/nfcwest/po...r-not-to-trade-that-is-the-cardinals-question

His comments lead me to believe he will take the 'conservative' approach as you call it---I call it one based on logic and knowledge of the odds and outcomes possible.

"Are you willing to put the franchise in a position to be set back for years if you're not right?" Keim said. "It can be crippling for us if we traded the next couple drafts to get get a player that's never taken a snap and doesn't have success.

"There's a lot of moving parts to it but at the end of the day, we've got to do the best thing for the organization."

Perhaps the Cards see a QB in this draft that they rated as one willing to take the gamble and SK is joining the other GMs and blowing smoke to hide his true intentions??? Have you come across any SK comments that show even the slightest indication that he is game for such a huge trade?

It would be a major surprise, surprise, surprise if he makes that kind of trade move. I think we can both agree on that.

We can definitely agree that he's not making that move. Not in a million years. And, sure, you can set your franchise back quite a bit if you miss on a big trade up. That's why it's called a risk. You have to have faith in your own ability to evaluate the player.

I absolutely HATE Keim's quote there, which is perfectly representative of why I don't think he has the guts as a GM. "Are you willing to put the franchise in a position to be set back for years if you're not right?" Dude, it is your fricking JOB to make those tough calls. If you can't make those kinds of calls on a player, then why the hell are you a GM?

I mean, Keim's more than confident enough to think he's smarter than everyone else in the league and reach in the first round--because there's not as much at stake. Oh, we missed on another 1st rounder...oh well, it's just one pick. Willingness to take small risks but a clear, now quoted/stated aversion to putting himself out there in a big way? That's clearly lacking guts to me.


And if anyone disagrees with you it's "beyond a fatal flaw."

(Curious... What exactly is "beyond" fatal?) ;)

And you're quoting...? Quoting without the actual quote is...?

In other words Keim isn't stupid.

In other words, he's with the gutless group. See, I can poach and make silly comments too ;)
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,776
Posts
5,411,300
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top