We might be a bit harsh on Blanks.
At this point it is not like anyone picked after Marshall is seriously making you regret picking Marshall although I did love Tony Wroten.
You can argue that Kawhi Leonard is better than Markieff although not much and Faried most certainly but that may be it so picking one of the top 3 best players that were available at #14 or so is not that bad really.
Sarver pointed out that they do analyse the entire draft board in hindsight and evaluate their analysis of how it played out and said they were pretty close.
That does not excuse them from failing to move up maybe for a more special talent.
Overall their moves in trades have not been that bad. They got Gortat for virtually nothing while ditching Hedo.
Michael Beasley was a very good signing. It does not matter that he is failed so far. He was exactly the kind of gamble the Suns had to do in their situation and it won't really cost them much at all.
Eric Gordon was the most mind-boggling signing.
Leonard is much better than Morris, as is Faried, Vucevic is unquestionably better, I'd gladly take Shumpert, or Brooks for Morris...
There are plenty of players picked after Morris that are better players. Mostly because Morris stinks.
I love the "Sarver hindsight" defense. It would be a thrill to go over the drafts since he bought the team and use his "hindsight" to show how "close" they were.
And please, tell me more about the great Beasley signing. Who cares if he is among the worst players in the league this year, who cares if he is 5 years into his career and has sucked throughout, who cares if we signed him to a 3 year deal for a rate that the wolves couldnt GIVE HIM AWAY at last season when he was expiring. Its a "great" signing. They at least have that feather in their hat. "We made it our top priority to ink a horrible player to a 3 year deal".
And if not for New Orleans matching Gordon's contract we would be royally screwed.